<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/url/026f2aa79a9f34d1c91d845b4a747bdc"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /url/026f2aa79a9f34d1c91d845b4a747bdc</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/rss/url/026f2aa79a9f34d1c91d845b4a747bdc</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /url/026f2aa79a9f34d1c91d845b4a747bdc</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_11_things_to_know.php"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_11_things_to_know.php"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_11_things_to_know.php"><title>11 Things To Know About Semantic Web - ReadWriteWeb</title><description></description><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_11_things_to_know.php</link><dc:creator>ch</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-02-18T16:11:44+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>web2.0 semanticweb </dc:subject><content:encoded></content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/web2.0"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/semanticweb"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_11_things_to_know.php"><title>11 Things To Know About Semantic Web - ReadWriteWeb</title><description> You don’t need to apologize for calling it Web 3.0. Of course the Web does not upgrade in one go like a company switching to Vista.  But there is a definite phase transition from current technologies. My personal Web 3.0 definition is “the combination of Web 2.0 mass collaboration with structured databases”.</description><link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_web_11_things_to_know.php</link><dc:creator>hotho</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-02-18T08:02:03+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>3.0 semantic web 2.0 </dc:subject><content:encoded>You don’t need to apologize for calling it Web 3.0. Of course the Web does not upgrade in one go like a company switching to Vista.  But there is a defini&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;span&gt; You don’t need to apologize for calling it Web 3.0. Of course the Web does not upgrade in one go like a company switching to Vista.  But there is a definite phase transition from current technologies. My personal Web 3.0 definition is “the combination of Web 2.0 mass collaboration with structured databases”.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/3.0"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/semantic"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/web"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/2.0"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>