<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/bibliothecaire/evaluation"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/bibliothecaire/evaluation</title><link>https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/bibliothecaire/evaluation</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/bibliothecaire/evaluation</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/333-UK-Research-Evaluation-Framework-Validate-Metrics-Against-Panel-Rankings.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://digitisation.jiscinvolve.org/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hebdo.nouvelobs.com/hebdo/parution/p2243/articles/a358205-.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aef.info/public/fr/abonne/depeche/depeche_detail.php?page=depeche_detail&amp;rub=dep&amp;id=84516"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/307-UK-RAE-Reform-Should-Be-Evidence-Based.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://prosper.inist.fr/article.php3?id_article=404"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aeres-evaluation.fr/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.harzing.com/resources.htm"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-07.htm#peerreview"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/333-UK-Research-Evaluation-Framework-Validate-Metrics-Against-Panel-Rankings.html"><title>UK Research Evaluation Framework: Validate Metrics Against Panel Rankings - Open Access Archivangelism</title><description> Once one sees the whole report, it turns out that theHEFCE/RAE Research Evaluation Frameworkis far better, far more flexible, and far more comprehensive than is reflected in either the press release or theExecutive Summary.   </description><link>http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/333-UK-Research-Evaluation-Framework-Validate-Metrics-Against-Panel-Rankings.html</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-24T07:50:11+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>IRRA RAE UK assessment evaluation research </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt; Once one sees the whole report, it turns out that theHEFCE/RAE Research Evaluation Frameworkis far better, far more flexible, and far more comprehensive than is reflected in either the press release or theExecutive Summary.   &lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/IRRA"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/RAE"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/UK"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/assessment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/research"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://digitisation.jiscinvolve.org/"><title>JISC Digitisation</title><description> Last September JISC ran an evaluation workshop for all projects which provided guidance on a methodological framework for evaluation based on the bookletSix Steps to Effective Evaluation: A Handbook for Programme and Project Managers, developed for JISC</description><link>http://digitisation.jiscinvolve.org/</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-23T07:51:28+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>IR JISC assessment evaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt; Last September JISC ran an evaluation workshop for all projects which provided guidance on a methodological framework for evaluation based on the bookletSix Steps to Effective Evaluation: A Handbook for Programme and Project Managers, developed for JISC&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/IR"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/JISC"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/assessment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://hebdo.nouvelobs.com/hebdo/parution/p2243/articles/a358205-.html"><title>L&#039;indéfendable palmarès de l&#039;Ecole des mine</title><description> Uniquement basé sur les diplômes détenus par les patrons des 500 plus grosses entreprises du monde, ce classement est si surréaliste qu&#039;on se demande s&#039;il n&#039;a pas été publié pour prouver que l&#039;exercice n&#039;a pas de sens.   </description><link>http://hebdo.nouvelobs.com/hebdo/parution/p2243/articles/a358205-.html</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-01T11:47:46+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>assessment classement ranking shanghai évaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt; Uniquement basé sur les diplômes détenus par les patrons des 500 plus grosses entreprises du monde, ce classement est si surréaliste qu&amp;#039;on se demande s&amp;#039;il n&amp;#039;a pas été publié pour prouver que l&amp;#039;exercice n&amp;#039;a pas de sens.   &lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/assessment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/classement"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ranking"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/shanghai"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/évaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.aef.info/public/fr/abonne/depeche/depeche_detail.php?page=depeche_detail&amp;rub=dep&amp;id=84516"><title>AEF - agence d&#039;informations spécialisées - [Le classement établi par les Mines confirme la &#034;ségrégation de la formation des élites&#034; en France (Gilbert Béréziat)]</title><description> Le classement mondial des établissements établi par les Mines confirme &#034;le particularisme français&#034;, à savoir la &#034;ségrégation de la formation des élites managériales au sein d’un petit nombre d’établissements fortement financés&#034;. C&#039;est ce</description><link>http://www.aef.info/public/fr/abonne/depeche/depeche_detail.php?page=depeche_detail&amp;rub=dep&amp;id=84516</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-11-01T11:43:20+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Shanghai assessment classement ranking évaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt; Le classement mondial des établissements établi par les Mines confirme &amp;#034;le particularisme français&amp;#034;, à savoir la &amp;#034;ségrégation de la formation des élites managériales au sein d’un petit nombre d’établissements fortement financés&amp;#034;. C&amp;#039;est ce&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Shanghai"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/assessment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/classement"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ranking"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/évaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/307-UK-RAE-Reform-Should-Be-Evidence-Based.html"><title>UK RAE Reform Should Be Evidence-Based - Open Access Archivangelism</title><description> UK RAE Reform Should Be Evidence-BasedTheUK Research Assessment Exercisehas takena few steps forward and a few steps back:(1)In evaluating and rewarding the research performance of universities department by department, future RAEs (after 2008) will no</description><link>http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/307-UK-RAE-Reform-Should-Be-Evidence-Based.html</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-10-12T17:30:03+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>assessment irra rae recherche research uk évaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt; UK RAE Reform Should Be Evidence-BasedTheUK Research Assessment Exercisehas takena few steps forward and a few steps back:(1)In evaluating and rewarding the research performance of universities department by department, future RAEs (after 2008) will no&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/assessment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/irra"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rae"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/recherche"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/research"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/uk"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/évaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://prosper.inist.fr/article.php3?id_article=404"><title>Prosper - Scopus et la mesure de la performance</title><description>Scopus lance une lettre d’information concernant la bibliométrie,Research Trends.Cette lettre, bimensuelle et gratuite, traite des indicateurs et de leur valeur, propose des analyses d’experts ou encore des points  - basés sur les données de Scop</description><link>http://prosper.inist.fr/article.php3?id_article=404</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-10-12T16:31:13+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>assessment evaluation research </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;Scopus lance une lettre d’information concernant la bibliométrie,Research Trends.Cette lettre, bimensuelle et gratuite, traite des indicateurs et de leur valeur, propose des analyses d’experts ou encore des points  - basés sur les données de Scop&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/assessment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/research"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.aeres-evaluation.fr/"><title>AERES-Agence d&#039;évaluation de la recherche et de l&#039;enseignement supérieur</title><description></description><link>http://www.aeres-evaluation.fr/</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-10-04T22:01:03+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>enseignement_supérieur evaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2007-10-04T22:01:03+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.aeres-evaluation.fr/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.aeres-evaluation.fr/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/enseignement_supérieur"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.harzing.com/resources.htm"><title>Harzing.com - Research in International and Cross-cultural Management</title><description>This section contains a collection of resources that might be of interest to people studying and researching in International and Cross-cultural Management.</description><link>http://www.harzing.com/resources.htm</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-09-28T12:01:50+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>bibliométrie evaluation metrics ranking recherche research scholarship scientométrie évaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;This section contains a collection of resources that might be of interest to people studying and researching in International and Cross-cultural Management.&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/bibliométrie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/metrics"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ranking"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/recherche"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/research"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/scholarship"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/scientométrie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/évaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-07.htm#peerreview"><title>Peter Suber, SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 9/2/07</title><description></description><link>http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-07.htm#peerreview</link><dc:creator>bibliothecaire</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-09-03T12:27:49+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>peerreview évaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2007-09-03T12:27:49+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-07.htm#peerreview&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-07.htm#peerreview&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/peerreview"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/évaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>