<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/brightbyte/truth"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/brightbyte/truth</title><link>https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/brightbyte/truth</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/brightbyte/truth</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://netzpolitik.org/2018/wer-checkt-die-faktenchecker-kontroverse-um-facebooks-externe-faktenpruefung/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://dirtprotocol.com/?utm_source=icodrops"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.houstonpress.com/arts/no-it-s-not-your-opinion-you-re-just-wrong-7611752"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj8GlqiOAIs&amp;feature=player_embedded"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lemonodor.com/archives/2008/02/protecting_journalistic_integrity_algorithmically.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="https://netzpolitik.org/2018/wer-checkt-die-faktenchecker-kontroverse-um-facebooks-externe-faktenpruefung/"><title>Wer checkt die Faktenchecker? Kontroverse um Facebooks „externe Faktenprüfung“ – netzpolitik.org</title><description>Wikipedia</description><link>https://netzpolitik.org/2018/wer-checkt-die-faktenchecker-kontroverse-um-facebooks-externe-faktenpruefung/</link><dc:creator>brightbyte</dc:creator><dc:date>2018-09-13T21:30:25+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>fake fakten netzpolitik news truth verifizierbarkeit wikipedia </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/fake"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/fakten"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/netzpolitik"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/news"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/truth"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/verifizierbarkeit"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wikipedia"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://dirtprotocol.com/?utm_source=icodrops"><title>DIRT Protocol</title><description>DIRT maintains accuracy at scale because every contributor needs to deposit tokens to write data. If the data is correct, it is freely shared. If the data is incorrect, anyone can challenge the data and earn tokens for identifying these inaccurate facts. Our protocol and platform makes it economically irrational for misinformation to persist in a data set. </description><link>https://dirtprotocol.com/?utm_source=icodrops</link><dc:creator>brightbyte</dc:creator><dc:date>2018-07-15T18:55:42+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>blockchain data structured truth wikidata wikipedia </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;DIRT maintains accuracy at scale because every contributor needs to deposit tokens to write data. If the data is correct, it is freely shared. If the data is incorrect, anyone can challenge the data and earn tokens for identifying these inaccurate facts. Our protocol and platform makes it economically irrational for misinformation to persist in a data set. &lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/blockchain"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/data"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/structured"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/truth"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wikidata"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wikipedia"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.houstonpress.com/arts/no-it-s-not-your-opinion-you-re-just-wrong-7611752"><title>Yes, Your Opinion Can Be Wrong | Houston Press</title><description></description><link>http://www.houstonpress.com/arts/no-it-s-not-your-opinion-you-re-just-wrong-7611752</link><dc:creator>brightbyte</dc:creator><dc:date>2015-07-28T01:33:15+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>arguments belief bullsit epistemology oppinion truth </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2015-07-28T01:33:15+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.houstonpress.com/arts/no-it-s-not-your-opinion-you-re-just-wrong-7611752&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.houstonpress.com/arts/no-it-s-not-your-opinion-you-re-just-wrong-7611752&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/arguments"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/belief"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/bullsit"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/epistemology"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oppinion"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/truth"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj8GlqiOAIs&amp;feature=player_embedded"><title>IPCC&#039;s Ben Santer admits GW hoax - YouTube</title><description>IPCC&#039;s Ben Santer admits GW hoax</description><link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj8GlqiOAIs&amp;feature=player_embedded</link><dc:creator>brightbyte</dc:creator><dc:date>2011-11-19T12:43:43+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>audio cut hoax interview journalism lies manipulation media ralitätsabgleich rant truth video youtube </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;IPCC&amp;#039;s Ben Santer admits GW hoax&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/audio"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/cut"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/hoax"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/interview"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/journalism"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/lies"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/manipulation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/media"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ralitätsabgleich"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rant"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/truth"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/video"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/youtube"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://lemonodor.com/archives/2008/02/protecting_journalistic_integrity_algorithmically.html"><title>Lemonodor: Protecting Journalistic Integrity Algorithmically</title><description></description><link>http://lemonodor.com/archives/2008/02/protecting_journalistic_integrity_algorithmically.html</link><dc:creator>brightbyte</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-30T16:13:52+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>forensics graphics imaging truth </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2008-04-30T16:13:52+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://lemonodor.com/archives/2008/02/protecting_journalistic_integrity_algorithmically.html&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://lemonodor.com/archives/2008/02/protecting_journalistic_integrity_algorithmically.html&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forensics"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/graphics"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/imaging"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/truth"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/"><title>Photo Tampering Throughout History</title><description></description><link>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/</link><dc:creator>brightbyte</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-04-25T10:26:53+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>cognition history manipulation perception photography propaganda truth </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2008-04-25T10:26:53+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/cognition"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/history"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/manipulation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/perception"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/photography"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/propaganda"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/truth"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>