<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/cschenk/usability"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/cschenk/usability</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/rss/user/cschenk/usability</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/cschenk/usability</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hcipatterns.org/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.blue-anvil.com/archives/the-use-of-access-keys"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.hcipatterns.org/"><title>hcipatterns.org : hcipatterns.org</title><description>This is the homepage of people interested in pattern languages in human-computer interaction (HCI).</description><link>http://www.hcipatterns.org/</link><dc:creator>cschenk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-02-13T07:12:02+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>gui plml patterns hci usability design </dc:subject><content:encoded>This is the homepage of people interested in pattern languages in human-computer interaction (HCI).</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/gui"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/plml"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/patterns"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/hci"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/usability"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.blue-anvil.com/archives/the-use-of-access-keys"><title>The use of access keys, a guide for webmasters</title><description>An access key is a HTML attribute that allows users to navigate to a certain link via the keyboard, rather than clicking. Its primary goal is to increase accessibility and usability in web pages for users who find using a mouse difficult.</description><link>http://www.blue-anvil.com/archives/the-use-of-access-keys</link><dc:creator>cschenk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-14T18:32:55+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>webdesign html accessibility usability design howto </dc:subject><content:encoded>An access key is a HTML attribute that allows users to navigate to a certain link via the keyboard, rather than clicking. Its primary goal is to increase a&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;An access key is a HTML attribute that allows users to navigate to a certain link via the keyboard, rather than clicking. Its primary goal is to increase accessibility and usability in web pages for users who find using a mouse difficult.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/webdesign"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/accessibility"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/usability"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/howto"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html"><title>&amp;#034;Reply-To&amp;#034; Munging Considered Harmful</title><description>Some administrators claim that Reply-To munging makes it easier for users to respond to the entire list, and helps encourage list traffic. These benefits are fallacious. Moreover, Reply-To can have harmful -- even dangerous -- effects. If you think Reply-To munging is a good idea, I hope I can change your mind.</description><link>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html</link><dc:creator>cschenk</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-10T17:47:16+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>considered-harmful reply-to email mail guide usability admin </dc:subject><content:encoded>Some administrators claim that Reply-To munging makes it easier for users to respond to the entire list, and helps encourage list traffic. These benefits a&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;Some administrators claim that Reply-To munging makes it easier for users to respond to the entire list, and helps encourage list traffic. These benefits are fallacious. Moreover, Reply-To can have harmful -- even dangerous -- effects. If you think Reply-To munging is a good idea, I hope I can change your mind.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/considered-harmful"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/reply-to"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/email"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/mail"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/guide"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/usability"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/admin"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>
