https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/cschie/BPMNBibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/cschie/BPMNTechnically, BPM/Business Rules approach place process logic with the BPM suite and decision logic  in the business rules management system (BRMS). The process logic in a BPM suite sequences and controls activities and launches and cancels processes. Control is achieved with timers and exception handlers. Processes can be designed to recover from errors, restart processes and coordinate activities. The BRMS effectively designs, organizes and executes the logic behind a process decision. An effective BRMS can handle any depth and complexity of decision logic, including computationally complex logic and dense logic.http://www.tomdebevoise.com/blog/?p=166cschie2009-03-24T14:45:39+01:00BPM BPMN BRMS decision rules business <span itemprop="description">Technically, BPM/Business Rules approach place process logic with the BPM suite and decision logic  in the business rules management system (BRMS). The process logic in a BPM suite sequences and controls activities and launches and cancels processes. Control is achieved with timers and exception handlers. Processes can be designed to recover from errors, restart processes and coordinate activities. The BRMS effectively designs, organizes and executes the logic behind a process decision. An effective BRMS can handle any depth and complexity of decision logic, including computationally complex logic and dense logic.</span>Bruce makes an interesting comment on business rules too: that “routing logic in process gateways” are not “business rules”. That doesn’t really make sense: for sure some gateways will be process-housekeeping decisions of little interest to the business user, but others will surely embed business-critical decisions. On the other hand, it has long been acknowledged that a best practice for BPM is to delegate such business decisions to a managed decision service - hence the explicit new business rule (aka decision) task in BPMN 2.0. And,in the CEP world, for tools like TIBCO BusinessEvents to invoke a decision managed by its Decision Manager tool.http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2009/03/20/event-handling-boosted-in-bpmn-20/cschie2009-03-23T10:14:44+01:00TIBCO CEP event BPM service processing BPMN decision 2.0 rules business <span itemprop="description">Bruce makes an interesting comment on business rules too: that “routing logic in process gateways” are not “business rules”. That doesn’t really make sense: for sure some gateways will be process-housekeeping decisions of little interest to the business user, but others will surely embed business-critical decisions. On the other hand, it has long been acknowledged that a best practice for BPM is to delegate such business decisions to a managed decision service - hence the explicit new business rule (aka decision) task in BPMN 2.0. And,in the CEP world, for tools like TIBCO BusinessEvents to invoke a decision managed by its Decision Manager tool.</span>The main characteristic to be aware of in these tools is that BE is primarily rule-based (using an embedded rule engine), whereas BW and iProcess are orchestration / flow engines. In BE we can use a state diagram to indicate a sequence of states which may define what process / rules apply, but this is really just another way of specifying a particular type of rules (i.e. state transition rules). The main advantages to specifying behavior as declarative rules are: Handling complex, event-driven behavior and choreography Iterative development, rule-by-rule The main advantages of flow diagrams and BPMN-type models are: Ease of understanding (especially for simpler process routes)  Process paths are pre-determined and therefore deemed guaranteeable. In combination these tools provide many of the IT capabilities required in an organization. For example, a business automation task uses BW to consolidate information from multiple existing sources, with human business processes for tasks such as process exceptions managed by iProcess. BE is used to consolidate (complex) events from systems to provide business information, or feed into or drive both BW and iProcess, and also monitors end-to-end system and case performance.http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2009/03/18/when-to-use-businessevents-or-businessworks-or-iprocess/cschie2009-03-19T17:07:49+01:00BPMN CEP SOA TIBCO complex event flow orchestration processing rules <span itemprop="description">The main characteristic to be aware of in these tools is that BE is primarily rule-based (using an embedded rule engine), whereas BW and iProcess are orchestration / flow engines. In BE we can use a state diagram to indicate a sequence of states which may define what process / rules apply, but this is really just another way of specifying a particular type of rules (i.e. state transition rules). The main advantages to specifying behavior as declarative rules are: Handling complex, event-driven behavior and choreography Iterative development, rule-by-rule The main advantages of flow diagrams and BPMN-type models are: Ease of understanding (especially for simpler process routes)  Process paths are pre-determined and therefore deemed guaranteeable. In combination these tools provide many of the IT capabilities required in an organization. For example, a business automation task uses BW to consolidate information from multiple existing sources, with human business processes for tasks such as process exceptions managed by iProcess. BE is used to consolidate (complex) events from systems to provide business information, or feed into or drive both BW and iProcess, and also monitors end-to-end system and case performance.</span>In diesem Buch werden alle relevanten modernen Standards der Geschäftsprozessanalyse und -modellierung miteinander verbunden und ihre praktische Handhabung dargestellt. Kern des Buches ist eine Geschäftsprozess-Methodik, die die verschiedenen Standards in praxisrelevanter und harmonischer Weise verbindet. Sie erfahren, welche Standards es gibt, wofür und wie diese eingesetzt werden können und welche Möglichkeiten aber auch möglichen Einschränkungen in der Praxis damit verbunden sind. Basis sind die BPMN (Business Process Modeling Notation), OSM (...), BMM (...), SBVR (..) und UML (...) - wobei diese Standards zielgerichtet nur soweit behandelt werden, wie es für die Auseinandersetzung mit Geschäftsprozessen notwendig ist. Sie erfahren wie Strategien, Geschäftsregeln und  Geschäftsprozesse dargestellt werden können und welche Strukturierungsmöglichkeiten es für Unternehmensarchitekten es gibt. Das Buch richtet sich an Business-Analysten, Prozessdesigner, Betriebsorganisatoren und verwandte Rollen.http://www.dpunkt.de/buecher/3148.htmlcschie2009-03-10T10:56:57+01:00BMM BPMN SBVR UML buch business process <span itemprop="description">In diesem Buch werden alle relevanten modernen Standards der Geschäftsprozessanalyse und -modellierung miteinander verbunden und ihre praktische Handhabung dargestellt. Kern des Buches ist eine Geschäftsprozess-Methodik, die die verschiedenen Standards in praxisrelevanter und harmonischer Weise verbindet. Sie erfahren, welche Standards es gibt, wofür und wie diese eingesetzt werden können und welche Möglichkeiten aber auch möglichen Einschränkungen in der Praxis damit verbunden sind. Basis sind die BPMN (Business Process Modeling Notation), OSM (...), BMM (...), SBVR (..) und UML (...) - wobei diese Standards zielgerichtet nur soweit behandelt werden, wie es für die Auseinandersetzung mit Geschäftsprozessen notwendig ist. Sie erfahren wie Strategien, Geschäftsregeln und  Geschäftsprozesse dargestellt werden können und welche Strukturierungsmöglichkeiten es für Unternehmensarchitekten es gibt. Das Buch richtet sich an Business-Analysten, Prozessdesigner, Betriebsorganisatoren und verwandte Rollen.</span>business processes and business rules capturing the operational logic and decisioning logic respectively. To study this analysis, we first need to understand theory which is the basis of their analysis i.e. BWW. Representational analysis is basically comparing constructs of representation theory with the constructs of the modeling grammar. The two evaluation criteria used are ontological completeness which determines the extent of lack of constructs in modeling grammar and ontological clarity. Now BWW is the representational theory to represent real world and has been earlier used to benchmark many languages. SRML and SBVR are compared to BWW to benchmark their representational power.http://blog.bizense.com/2008/12/27/a-representational-analysis/cschie2009-03-03T13:21:21+01:00BPMN BWW SBVR SRML analysis business capturing decisioning logic operational process representational rules <span itemprop="description">business processes and business rules capturing the operational logic and decisioning logic respectively. To study this analysis, we first need to understand theory which is the basis of their analysis i.e. BWW. Representational analysis is basically comparing constructs of representation theory with the constructs of the modeling grammar. The two evaluation criteria used are ontological completeness which determines the extent of lack of constructs in modeling grammar and ontological clarity. Now BWW is the representational theory to represent real world and has been earlier used to benchmark many languages. SRML and SBVR are compared to BWW to benchmark their representational power.</span>“BPM 2.0″ includes SOA, RIA, business rules, BAM, model-driven, app-server-free.http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/11/11/bpmi-tt-eu-08-setting-expectations-for-bpmn-30/cschie2009-02-26T14:51:47+01:00BPM BPMN CEP business complex event processing rules <span itemprop="description">“BPM 2.0″ includes SOA, RIA, business rules, BAM, model-driven, app-server-free.</span>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/30/advanced-event-driven-process-modeling/cschie2009-02-26T11:04:11+01:00BPDM BPMN CEP event modeling processing <a itemprop="url" data-versiondate="2009-02-26T11:04:11+01:00" href="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/30/advanced-event-driven-process-modeling/" rel="nofollow" class="description-link">http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2008/06/30/advanced-event-driven-process-modeling/</a>http://blog.lombardicto.com/2007/04/index.htmlcschie2009-02-26T10:51:03+01:00BPDM BPMN modeling process <a itemprop="url" data-versiondate="2009-02-26T10:51:03+01:00" href="http://blog.lombardicto.com/2007/04/index.html" rel="nofollow" class="description-link">http://blog.lombardicto.com/2007/04/index.html</a>http://diveintobpm.org/cschie2009-02-18T13:39:25+01:00BPMN business management process <a itemprop="url" data-versiondate="2009-02-18T13:39:25+01:00" href="http://diveintobpm.org/" rel="nofollow" class="description-link">http://diveintobpm.org/</a>http://diveintobpm.org/laszlo-explorer/Pages/TrainingKit%20BPMN%201.1%20-%20Version%201.0.1.pdfcschie2009-02-18T13:26:42+01:00BPMN introduction training <a itemprop="url" data-versiondate="2009-02-18T13:26:42+01:00" href="http://diveintobpm.org/laszlo-explorer/Pages/TrainingKit%20BPMN%201.1%20-%20Version%201.0.1.pdf" rel="nofollow" class="description-link">http://diveintobpm.org/laszlo-explorer/Pages/TrainingKit%20BPMN%201.1%20-%20Version%201.0.1.pdf</a>P:\6. Forschung\Literatur\Operational Intelligence\BPMNhttps://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/BPX/Process+Modeling+with+BPMN+-+Article+Seriescschie2009-02-17T11:51:14+01:00BPMN Notation SAP business modeling process wiki <span itemprop="description">P:\6. Forschung\Literatur\Operational Intelligence\BPMN</span>