<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/cschie/engine"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/cschie/engine</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/rss/user/cschie/engine</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/cschie/engine</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openlexicon.org/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2008/10/the-evolution-o.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSR-94"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://geekswithblogs.net/cyoung/articles/118506.aspx"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/06/26/differences-between-a-bre-and-a-rule-driven-cep-engine-part-1/"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.openlexicon.org/"><title>OpenLexicon.org - Home</title><description>OpenLexicon is an open-source business rules and process management tool that rapidly develops applications for transaction and process-based applications. OpenLexicon is known for providing high performance solutions and has been used in a number of enterprise-level applications. You can read about these here . You can use either product separately or in concert. There are two main components of OpenLexicon: the metadata repository and the business rules engine. Major components of OpenLexicon are released as open source software under the OpenLexicon OpenSource License. A good overview of the business rules approach is available here .OpenLexicon has a Wizard that is a web-form based collaborative tool for building business rules and business use cases. For a brief overview of the wizard, look at this link . We have designed the Wizard for non-developers and analysts with light technical skills. It features a richer experience for the users on the web, traditionally only offered by thick-client UIs.  The collaboration team assembles groups of business rules into a business use case and published in a metadata file or the database. OpenLexicon provides solid support for web services. You can read about the OpenLexicon WSDL here . There is also an eclipse plug-in for web services here .  You create complex application behavior with OpenLexicon’s process management. OpenLexicon can build an application reads data from a file, performs reference data lookups, validates the entire object, and then stores it in a database table. You can read about this here . Plus, you can build the application in the Wizard while writing no code! OpenLexicon also supports web services. A simple architecture diagram for OpenLexicon is included here .</description><link>http://www.openlexicon.org/</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-19T16:13:18+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>business engine management openLexicon process repository rules system tool </dc:subject><content:encoded>OpenLexicon is an open-source business rules and process management tool that rapidly develops applications for transaction and process-based applications.&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;OpenLexicon is an open-source business rules and process management tool that rapidly develops applications for transaction and process-based applications. OpenLexicon is known for providing high performance solutions and has been used in a number of enterprise-level applications. You can read about these here . You can use either product separately or in concert. There are two main components of OpenLexicon: the metadata repository and the business rules engine. Major components of OpenLexicon are released as open source software under the OpenLexicon OpenSource License. A good overview of the business rules approach is available here .OpenLexicon has a Wizard that is a web-form based collaborative tool for building business rules and business use cases. For a brief overview of the wizard, look at this link . We have designed the Wizard for non-developers and analysts with light technical skills. It features a richer experience for the users on the web, traditionally only offered by thick-client UIs.  The collaboration team assembles groups of business rules into a business use case and published in a metadata file or the database. OpenLexicon provides solid support for web services. You can read about the OpenLexicon WSDL here . There is also an eclipse plug-in for web services here .  You create complex application behavior with OpenLexicon’s process management. OpenLexicon can build an application reads data from a file, performs reference data lookups, validates the entire object, and then stores it in a database table. You can read about this here . Plus, you can build the application in the Wizard while writing no code! OpenLexicon also supports web services. A simple architecture diagram for OpenLexicon is included here .&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/engine"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/management"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/openLexicon"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/process"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/repository"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/system"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/tool"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2008/10/the-evolution-o.html"><title>The evolution of BRMS (part 1) - Enterprise Decision Management - a Weblog</title><description>For those of you that could not make it, I wanted to give you the gist of what I presented.  This presentation covers the evolution of the business rules technology focusing first on the drivers that forced the market to shift its focus from Business Rules Engines (BRE) to Business Rules Management Systems (BRMS).  In a nutshell, the main ideas are summarized below.  In a few days, the recording will also be posted on our community site for your convenience.</description><link>http://www.edmblog.com/weblog/2008/10/the-evolution-o.html</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-13T10:51:46+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>BRE BRMS business decision engine enterprise evolution management rules systems technology </dc:subject><content:encoded>For those of you that could not make it, I wanted to give you the gist of what I presented.  This presentation covers the evolution of the business rules t&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;For those of you that could not make it, I wanted to give you the gist of what I presented.  This presentation covers the evolution of the business rules technology focusing first on the drivers that forced the market to shift its focus from Business Rules Engines (BRE) to Business Rules Management Systems (BRMS).  In a nutshell, the main ideas are summarized below.  In a few days, the recording will also be posted on our community site for your convenience.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/BRE"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/BRMS"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/decision"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/engine"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/enterprise"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evolution"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/management"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/systems"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/technology"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSR-94"><title>JSR-94 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title><description>JSR-94 is the Java Specification Request for a Java Rules Engine API.</description><link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSR-94</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-09T11:01:52+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>API JSR engine java rules </dc:subject><content:encoded>JSR-94 is the Java Specification Request for a Java Rules Engine API.</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/API"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/JSR"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/engine"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/java"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://geekswithblogs.net/cyoung/articles/118506.aspx"><title>MS BRE: The Rules Engine Update (REU) Service and Policy Execution</title><description>The MS Rules Framework was a spirited attempt by MS to create a wide-ranging environment that could integrate rules held in different forms in different repositories, mange the deployment of rule sets out across an enterprise environment and even target a range of different rules engines.</description><link>http://geekswithblogs.net/cyoung/articles/118506.aspx</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-02T14:22:15+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>engine enterprise environment framework ms policy repository rules service update </dc:subject><content:encoded>The MS Rules Framework was a spirited attempt by MS to create a wide-ranging environment that could integrate rules held in different forms in different re&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;The MS Rules Framework was a spirited attempt by MS to create a wide-ranging environment that could integrate rules held in different forms in different repositories, mange the deployment of rule sets out across an enterprise environment and even target a range of different rules engines.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/engine"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/enterprise"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/environment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/framework"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ms"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/policy"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/repository"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/service"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/update"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/06/26/differences-between-a-bre-and-a-rule-driven-cep-engine-part-1/"><title>Complex Event Processing (CEP) Blog » Differences between a BRE and a rule-driven CEP engine (Part 1)</title><description>Most BREs today are deployed as “decision services”, and are used in “stateless” transactions to make “decisions” as a part of a business process. A CEP application is instead processing multiple event streams and sources over time, which requires a “stateful” rule service optimized for long running. This is an important distinction, as a stateful BRE for long-running processes needs to have failover support - the ability to cache its working memory for application restarting or distribution. And of course long-running processes need to be very particular over issues like memory handling - no memory leaks allowed!</description><link>http://tibcoblogs.com/cep/2007/06/26/differences-between-a-bre-and-a-rule-driven-cep-engine-part-1/</link><dc:creator>cschie</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-27T10:41:49+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>CEP EDA architecture business complex engine event processing rules service </dc:subject><content:encoded>Most BREs today are deployed as “decision services”, and are used in “stateless” transactions to make “decisions” as a part of a business process. A CEP ap&lt;span class=&#034;info&#034;&gt;...&lt;div&gt;Most BREs today are deployed as “decision services”, and are used in “stateless” transactions to make “decisions” as a part of a business process. A CEP application is instead processing multiple event streams and sources over time, which requires a “stateful” rule service optimized for long running. This is an important distinction, as a stateful BRE for long-running processes needs to have failover support - the ability to cache its working memory for application restarting or distribution. And of course long-running processes need to be very particular over issues like memory handling - no memory leaks allowed!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/CEP"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/EDA"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/architecture"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/business"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/complex"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/engine"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/event"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/processing"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rules"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/service"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>
