<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/fsteeg/performance"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/fsteeg/performance</title><link>https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/fsteeg/performance</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/fsteeg/performance</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.azulsystems.com/cliff/2009/09/java-vs-c-performance-again.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.freewebs.com/godaves/javabench_revisited/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark.html"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://blogs.azulsystems.com/cliff/2009/09/java-vs-c-performance-again.html"><title>Java vs C performance... again...</title><description>Shows how dynamic compilation can be more efficient than static compilation</description><link>http://blogs.azulsystems.com/cliff/2009/09/java-vs-c-performance-again.html</link><dc:creator>fsteeg</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-08T20:51:39+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>c java performance </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;Shows how dynamic compilation can be more efficient than static compilation&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/c"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/java"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/performance"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.freewebs.com/godaves/javabench_revisited/"><title>&#039;The Java Faster than C++&#039; Benchmark Revisited</title><description></description><link>http://www.freewebs.com/godaves/javabench_revisited/</link><dc:creator>fsteeg</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-10-08T16:51:42+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>benchmark c++ java performance </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2008-10-08T16:51:42+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.freewebs.com/godaves/javabench_revisited/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.freewebs.com/godaves/javabench_revisited/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/benchmark"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/c++"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/java"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/performance"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark.html"><title>Performance of Java versus C++</title><description>(Even then... in 2004...)</description><link>http://www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark.html</link><dc:creator>fsteeg</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-10-08T16:51:04+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>benchmark c++ java performance </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;(Even then... in 2004...)&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/benchmark"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/c++"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/java"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/performance"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>