<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/janhodel/study"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/janhodel/study</title><link>https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/janhodel/study</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/janhodel/study</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/"><title>An empirical examination of Wikipedia&#039;s credibility</title><description></description><link>http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/</link><dc:creator>janhodel</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-01T14:39:20+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>web2.0 informationskompetenz study wiki Evaluation library research wikipedia credibility </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2006-12-01T14:39:20+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/web2.0"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/informationskompetenz"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/study"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wiki"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/library"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/research"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wikipedia"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/credibility"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>