<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/neilernst/empirical"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/neilernst/empirical</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/rss/user/neilernst/empirical</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/neilernst/empirical</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://amazinnggg.blogspot.com/2006/04/how-widespread-is-uml.html"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://amazinnggg.blogspot.com/2006/04/how-widespread-is-uml.html"><title>Amazing: How widespread is UML?</title><description>Julio Leite looks at UML penetration</description><link>http://amazinnggg.blogspot.com/2006/04/how-widespread-is-uml.html</link><dc:creator>neilernst</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-06-25T21:52:06+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>empirical uml software </dc:subject><content:encoded>Julio Leite looks at UML penetration</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/empirical"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/uml"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/software"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>