<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/schmitz/fatbelly"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/schmitz/fatbelly</title><link>http://www.bibsonomy.org/rss/user/schmitz/fatbelly</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/schmitz/fatbelly</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tagschema.com/blogs/tagschema/2006/10/putting-folk-back-in-folksonomy.html"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://tagschema.com/blogs/tagschema/2006/10/putting-folk-back-in-folksonomy.html"><title>tagschema: Putting the &amp;#034;folk&amp;#034; back in folksonomy</title><description>Greenplum</description><link>http://tagschema.com/blogs/tagschema/2006/10/putting-folk-back-in-folksonomy.html</link><dc:creator>schmitz</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-07T15:40:22+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>fattail folksonomy tagging fatbelly </dc:subject><content:encoded>Greenplum</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/fattail"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/folksonomy"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/tagging"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/fatbelly"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>
