<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/wdees/evaluation"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/wdees/evaluation</title><link>https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/wdees/evaluation</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/wdees/evaluation</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://enressh.eu/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/09/27/better-research-evaluation-in-seven-hashtags/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://thebibliomagician.wordpress.com/2018/07/09/dora-the-leiden-manifesto-a-universitys-right-to-choose/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.leopoldina.org/uploads/tx_leopublication/2017_Statement_3Acad_Evaluation.pdf"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.methodspace.com/three-stages-data-analysis-evaluating-raw-data/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cabells.com/about-blacklist"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.evalhum.eu/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/blog"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://responsiblemetrics.org/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2014/5664/pdf/EIS_Workingpaper_3_2013.pdf"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/173/218"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&amp;context=diana_hicks"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://libraryresearch.weebly.com/index.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pure.iva.dk/files/30773014/Maria_Lillk_ll.pdf"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/content.php?pid=57490&amp;sid=421433"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/index.asp?pn=texte&amp;id=1103"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cesifo-group.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202006/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%20February%202006/cesifo1_wp1673.pdf"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forschungsmonitoring.org/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wissenschaftsmanagement-online.de/converis/artikel/678"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="https://enressh.eu/"><title>ENRESSH</title><description></description><link>https://enressh.eu/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2018-12-11T13:05:22+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>europa evaluation forschung geisteswissenschaften sozialwissenschaften </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2018-12-11T13:05:22+01:00&#034; href=&#034;https://enressh.eu/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;https://enressh.eu/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/europa"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/geisteswissenschaften"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/sozialwissenschaften"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/09/27/better-research-evaluation-in-seven-hashtags/"><title>Impact of Social Sciences – Better, fairer, more meaningful research evaluation – in seven hashtags</title><description></description><link>http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/09/27/better-research-evaluation-in-seven-hashtags/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2018-09-27T12:56:59+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation forschung </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2018-09-27T12:56:59+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/09/27/better-research-evaluation-in-seven-hashtags/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/09/27/better-research-evaluation-in-seven-hashtags/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://thebibliomagician.wordpress.com/2018/07/09/dora-the-leiden-manifesto-a-universitys-right-to-choose/"><title>DORA, the Leiden Manifesto &amp; a university’s right to choose</title><description></description><link>https://thebibliomagician.wordpress.com/2018/07/09/dora-the-leiden-manifesto-a-universitys-right-to-choose/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2018-07-26T14:19:27+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation forschung </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2018-07-26T14:19:27+02:00&#034; href=&#034;https://thebibliomagician.wordpress.com/2018/07/09/dora-the-leiden-manifesto-a-universitys-right-to-choose/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;https://thebibliomagician.wordpress.com/2018/07/09/dora-the-leiden-manifesto-a-universitys-right-to-choose/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.leopoldina.org/uploads/tx_leopublication/2017_Statement_3Acad_Evaluation.pdf"><title>Statement by three national academies</title><description>(Académie des Sciences, Leopoldina and Royal Society) on good practice in the evaluation of researchers and research programmes</description><link>http://www.leopoldina.org/uploads/tx_leopublication/2017_Statement_3Acad_Evaluation.pdf</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2017-12-15T09:20:33+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation peer_review </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;(Académie des Sciences, Leopoldina and Royal Society) on good practice in the evaluation of researchers and research programmes&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/peer_review"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://www.methodspace.com/three-stages-data-analysis-evaluating-raw-data/"><title>The Three Stages of Data Analysis: Evaluating Raw Data - MethodSpace</title><description></description><link>https://www.methodspace.com/three-stages-data-analysis-evaluating-raw-data/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2017-08-30T09:27:45+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation forschungsdaten </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2017-08-30T09:27:45+02:00&#034; href=&#034;https://www.methodspace.com/three-stages-data-analysis-evaluating-raw-data/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;https://www.methodspace.com/three-stages-data-analysis-evaluating-raw-data/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschungsdaten"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://cabells.com/about-blacklist"><title>Cabell&#039;s International</title><description></description><link>https://cabells.com/about-blacklist</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2017-07-25T14:31:36+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation zeitschrift </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2017-07-25T14:31:36+02:00&#034; href=&#034;https://cabells.com/about-blacklist&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;https://cabells.com/about-blacklist&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/zeitschrift"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.evalhum.eu/"><title>EvalHum</title><description></description><link>http://www.evalhum.eu/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2017-05-19T09:29:15+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation forschung geisteswissenschaften sozialwissenschaften </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2017-05-19T09:29:15+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.evalhum.eu/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.evalhum.eu/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/geisteswissenschaften"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/sozialwissenschaften"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/blog"><title>Leiden manifesto for research Metrics - Blog</title><description></description><link>http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/blog</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2016-08-05T11:10:26+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation forschung standards </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2016-08-05T11:10:26+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/blog&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/blog&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/standards"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://responsiblemetrics.org/"><title>Responsible Metrics » A forum for responsible use of metrics</title><description></description><link>https://responsiblemetrics.org/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2015-07-09T09:05:51+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>bibliometrie evaluation wissenschaftspolitik </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2015-07-09T09:05:51+02:00&#034; href=&#034;https://responsiblemetrics.org/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;https://responsiblemetrics.org/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/bibliometrie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wissenschaftspolitik"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2014/5664/pdf/EIS_Workingpaper_3_2013.pdf"><title>Zur Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Publikationsleistungen in der Sportwissenschaft</title><description></description><link>http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2014/5664/pdf/EIS_Workingpaper_3_2013.pdf</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2015-03-25T14:51:21+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Sportwissenschaften evaluation leistungsmessung publikation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2015-03-25T14:51:21+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2014/5664/pdf/EIS_Workingpaper_3_2013.pdf&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2014/5664/pdf/EIS_Workingpaper_3_2013.pdf&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Sportwissenschaften"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/leistungsmessung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/publikation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/173/218"><title>Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: a problematic relationship?</title><description></description><link>http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/173/218</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2015-03-04T10:49:06+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Web_of_Science bibliometrie evaluation geisteswissenschaften sozialwissenschaften </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2015-03-04T10:49:06+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/173/218&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/173/218&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Web_of_Science"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/bibliometrie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/geisteswissenschaften"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/sozialwissenschaften"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&amp;context=diana_hicks"><title>Bibliometrics as a Tool for Research Evaluation</title><description></description><link>http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&amp;context=diana_hicks</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-10-26T20:16:18+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>bibliometrie evaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2012-10-26T20:16:18+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&amp;amp;context=diana_hicks&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&amp;amp;context=diana_hicks&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/bibliometrie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://libraryresearch.weebly.com/index.html"><title>Evaluating Research: Citation Analysis - Welcome</title><description></description><link>http://libraryresearch.weebly.com/index.html</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-10-24T16:00:38+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>erziehungswissenschaft evaluation lehrveranstaltung zitationsanalyse </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2012-10-24T16:00:38+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://libraryresearch.weebly.com/index.html&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://libraryresearch.weebly.com/index.html&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/erziehungswissenschaft"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/lehrveranstaltung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/zitationsanalyse"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://pure.iva.dk/files/30773014/Maria_Lillk_ll.pdf"><title>Evaluation of journal ranking for research evaluation purposes in the Social Sciences</title><description></description><link>http://pure.iva.dk/files/30773014/Maria_Lillk_ll.pdf</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-08-31T13:26:57+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation ranking sozialwissenschaften zeitschrift </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2010-08-31T13:26:57+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://pure.iva.dk/files/30773014/Maria_Lillk_ll.pdf&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://pure.iva.dk/files/30773014/Maria_Lillk_ll.pdf&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/ranking"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/sozialwissenschaften"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/zeitschrift"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/content.php?pid=57490&amp;sid=421433"><title>Evaluating Journals</title><description></description><link>http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/content.php?pid=57490&amp;sid=421433</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-02-14T17:27:13+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Zeitschrift erziehungswissenschaft evaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2010-02-14T17:27:13+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/content.php?pid=57490&amp;amp;sid=421433&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://libguides.lib.msu.edu/content.php?pid=57490&amp;amp;sid=421433&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Zeitschrift"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/erziehungswissenschaft"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/index.asp?pn=texte&amp;id=1103"><title>Forum Qualitätsmessung: „Qualitätsmessung, Evaluation, Forschungsrating. Risiken und Chancen für die Geschichtswissenschaften?“ - H-Soz-u-Kult / Texte</title><description></description><link>http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/index.asp?pn=texte&amp;id=1103</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-07-02T19:18:31+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Qualität evaluation forschung geschichtswissenschaft messung rating </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2009-07-02T19:18:31+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/index.asp?pn=texte&amp;amp;id=1103&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/index.asp?pn=texte&amp;amp;id=1103&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Qualität"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/geschichtswissenschaft"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/messung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rating"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.cesifo-group.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202006/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%20February%202006/cesifo1_wp1673.pdf"><title>Evaluation of Researchers: a Life Cycle Analysis of German Academic Economists</title><description></description><link>http://www.cesifo-group.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202006/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%20February%202006/cesifo1_wp1673.pdf</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-06-23T12:27:50+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation forschung wirtschaftswissenschaften </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2009-06-23T12:27:50+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.cesifo-group.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202006/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%20February%202006/cesifo1_wp1673.pdf&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.cesifo-group.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202006/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%20February%202006/cesifo1_wp1673.pdf&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wirtschaftswissenschaften"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.forschungsmonitoring.org/"><title>Portal Forschungsmonitoring</title><description></description><link>http://www.forschungsmonitoring.org/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-26T13:41:52+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>forschung wirtschaftswissenschaften evaluation </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2009-03-26T13:41:52+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.forschungsmonitoring.org/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.forschungsmonitoring.org/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/wirtschaftswissenschaften"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.wissenschaftsmanagement-online.de/converis/artikel/678"><title>Wissenschaftsmanagement Online: Informationssysteme zu Forschungsprojekten und Evaluationsforschung: Neue Anforderungen und Synergien</title><description></description><link>http://www.wissenschaftsmanagement-online.de/converis/artikel/678</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-02T16:44:54+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation forschung informationssystem </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2009-03-02T16:44:54+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.wissenschaftsmanagement-online.de/converis/artikel/678&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.wissenschaftsmanagement-online.de/converis/artikel/678&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/forschung"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/informationssystem"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/"><title>Use And Misuse Of Bibliometric Indices In Evaluating Scholarly Performance</title><description></description><link>http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/</link><dc:creator>wdees</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-08-12T09:45:26+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>bibliometrie evaluation indikatoren </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2008-08-12T09:45:26+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/bibliometrie"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/indikatoren"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>