<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel rdf:about="https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/yish/evaluation"><title>BibSonomy bookmarks for /user/yish/evaluation</title><link>https://www.bibsonomy.org/user/yish/evaluation</link><description>BibSonomy RSS Feed for /user/yish/evaluation</description><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://teacher-ready.iste.org/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/olc-quality-scorecard-suite/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.peergrade.io/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/22/most-institutions-say-they-value-teaching-how-they-assess-it-tells-different-story?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&amp;utm_campaign=92984764da-DNU&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-92984764da-197615645&amp;mc_cid=92984764da&amp;mc_eid=085601d71c"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.staffs.ac.uk/bestpracticemodels/edat/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ecb-check.net/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://oro.open.ac.uk/37836/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fevatools.wikispaces.com/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/evaluation-some-parting-thoughts.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/evaluation/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/oldsmooc-w7/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/week-7-evaluation-oldsmooc.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/expertheuristic.htm"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.achieve.org/oer-rubrics"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="https://teacher-ready.iste.org/"><title>Teacher Ready Evaluation Tool:Home</title><description>The Teacher Ready evaluation tool helps standardize the evaluation of edtech products, focusing on the user experience.</description><link>https://teacher-ready.iste.org/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2024-07-10T18:22:55+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>edtech evaluation index review score standards tool </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;The Teacher Ready evaluation tool helps standardize the evaluation of edtech products, focusing on the user experience.&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/edtech"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/index"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/review"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/score"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/standards"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/tool"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/olc-quality-scorecard-suite/"><title>OLC Quality Scorecard - Improve the Quality of Online Learning &amp; Teaching</title><description>The OLC Quality Scorecard - Benchmarking Tools, Checklists, &amp; Rubrics for Evaluating the Quality and Effectiveness of Online Learning Programs &amp; Courses</description><link>https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/olc-quality-scorecard-suite/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2021-04-25T16:14:14+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>education evaluation learning online rubric scorecard </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;The OLC Quality Scorecard - Benchmarking Tools, Checklists, &amp;amp; Rubrics for Evaluating the Quality and Effectiveness of Online Learning Programs &amp;amp; Courses&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/education"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/online"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rubric"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/scorecard"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://www.peergrade.io/"><title>Peergrade - engaging student peer review</title><description>Learn by giving feedback! Peergrade is a free online platform to facilitate peer feedback sessions with students.</description><link>https://www.peergrade.io/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2019-05-12T11:49:57+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>assessment evaluation feedback free online peer tool </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;Learn by giving feedback! Peergrade is a free online platform to facilitate peer feedback sessions with students.&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/assessment"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/feedback"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/free"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/online"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/peer"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/tool"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/22/most-institutions-say-they-value-teaching-how-they-assess-it-tells-different-story?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&amp;utm_campaign=92984764da-DNU&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-92984764da-197615645&amp;mc_cid=92984764da&amp;mc_eid=085601d71c"><title>Most institutions say they value teaching but how they assess it tells a different story</title><description>Most institutions say they value teaching. But how they assess it tells a different story. University of Southern California has stopped using student evaluations of teaching in promotion decisions in favor of peer-review model. Oregon seeks to end quantitative evaluations of teaching for holistic model.</description><link>https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/22/most-institutions-say-they-value-teaching-how-they-assess-it-tells-different-story?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&amp;utm_campaign=92984764da-DNU&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-92984764da-197615645&amp;mc_cid=92984764da&amp;mc_eid=085601d71c</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2018-05-22T15:54:37+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>SET evaluation student teaching משובים </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;Most institutions say they value teaching. But how they assess it tells a different story. University of Southern California has stopped using student evaluations of teaching in promotion decisions in favor of peer-review model. Oregon seeks to end quantitative evaluations of teaching for holistic model.&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/SET"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/student"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/teaching"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/משובים"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://blogs.staffs.ac.uk/bestpracticemodels/edat/"><title>eDAT | Best Practice Models for e-Design</title><description>The e-Design Assessment Tool (eDAT) is a tool to help tutors represent and evaluate effective blended or distance learning designs. The eDAT combines a simple analysis of the learning activities with reflections on the teaching and learning perspective that underpins the design.</description><link>http://blogs.staffs.ac.uk/bestpracticemodels/edat/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2017-09-19T13:30:11+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>design evaluation learning rubric tool </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;span itemprop=&#034;description&#034;&gt;The e-Design Assessment Tool (eDAT) is a tool to help tutors represent and evaluate effective blended or distance learning designs. The eDAT combines a simple analysis of the learning activities with reflections on the teaching and learning perspective that underpins the design.&lt;/span&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rubric"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/tool"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.ecb-check.net/"><title>ECBCheck | e-learning programme certification</title><description></description><link>http://www.ecb-check.net/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2016-02-11T16:03:41+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>audit elearning evaluation quality </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2016-02-11T16:03:41+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.ecb-check.net/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.ecb-check.net/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/audit"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/elearning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/quality"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric"><title>Higher Ed Program &gt; Rubric | Quality Matters Program</title><description></description><link>https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2014-08-12T12:46:34+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>design distance education evaluation higher learning online rubric </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2014-08-12T12:46:34+02:00&#034; href=&#034;https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/distance"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/education"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/higher"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/online"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rubric"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://oro.open.ac.uk/37836/"><title>Evaluation of the OLDS MOOC curriculum design course: participant perspectives, expectations and experiences - Open Research Online</title><description></description><link>http://oro.open.ac.uk/37836/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-07-10T11:09:30+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>evaluation feedback mooc oldsmooc </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2013-07-10T11:09:30+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://oro.open.ac.uk/37836/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://oro.open.ac.uk/37836/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/feedback"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/mooc"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://fevatools.wikispaces.com/"><title>fevatools - home</title><description></description><link>http://fevatools.wikispaces.com/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-04-18T15:26:06+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>design education evaluation formative learning </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2013-04-18T15:26:06+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://fevatools.wikispaces.com/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://fevatools.wikispaces.com/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/education"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/formative"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/evaluation-some-parting-thoughts.html"><title>Multilitteratus Incognitus: Evaluation, some parting thoughts (#oldsmooc)</title><description></description><link>http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/evaluation-some-parting-thoughts.html</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-02-28T19:33:44+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>blogs evaluation oldsmooc oldsmooc-w7 </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2013-02-28T19:33:44+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/evaluation-some-parting-thoughts.html&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/evaluation-some-parting-thoughts.html&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/blogs"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc-w7"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/evaluation/"><title>Evaluation – Isn’t there an off the peg solution? – The Digital Day</title><description></description><link>http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/evaluation/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-02-27T11:57:36+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>blogs design evaluation learning oldsmooc oldsmooc-w7 </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2013-02-27T11:57:36+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/evaluation/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/evaluation/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/blogs"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc-w7"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/oldsmooc-w7/"><title>Learning Design &amp; Formative Evaluation. OLDSMOOC W7 – The Digital Day</title><description></description><link>http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/oldsmooc-w7/</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-02-27T11:57:28+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>blogs design evaluation learning oldsmooc oldsmooc-w7 </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2013-02-27T11:57:28+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/oldsmooc-w7/&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://thedigitalday.wordpress.com/2013/02/26/oldsmooc-w7/&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/blogs"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc-w7"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/week-7-evaluation-oldsmooc.html"><title>Multilitteratus Incognitus: Week 7 - Evaluation (OLDSMOOC)</title><description></description><link>http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/week-7-evaluation-oldsmooc.html</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2013-02-25T13:19:28+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>blogs design evaluation learning oldsmooc oldsmooc-w7 </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2013-02-25T13:19:28+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/week-7-evaluation-oldsmooc.html&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://idstuff.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/week-7-evaluation-oldsmooc.html&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/blogs"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/oldsmooc-w7"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/expertheuristic.htm"><title>UsabilityNet: Heuristic evaluation</title><description></description><link>http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/expertheuristic.htm</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-04-06T01:58:08+02:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Heuristic design evaluation usability </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2012-04-06T01:58:08+02:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/expertheuristic.htm&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/expertheuristic.htm&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/Heuristic"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/usability"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item><item rdf:about="http://www.achieve.org/oer-rubrics"><title>OER Rubrics and Evaluation Tool | Achieve.org</title><description></description><link>http://www.achieve.org/oer-rubrics</link><dc:creator>yish</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-03-02T11:35:01+01:00</dc:date><dc:subject>OER design education evaluation learning rubric </dc:subject><content:encoded>&lt;a itemprop=&#034;url&#034; data-versiondate=&#034;2012-03-02T11:35:01+01:00&#034; href=&#034;http://www.achieve.org/oer-rubrics&#034; rel=&#034;nofollow&#034; class=&#034;description-link&#034;&gt;http://www.achieve.org/oer-rubrics&lt;/a&gt;</content:encoded><taxo:topics><rdf:Bag><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/OER"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/design"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/education"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/evaluation"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/learning"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/rubric"/></rdf:Bag></taxo:topics></item></rdf:RDF>