]> BibSonomy publications for/bibtex/1a49c2c09fa7e4ab0547ff5353bd7105f San Diego Law Review, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper289'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy442007data_mining misunderstandings nothing_to_hide privacy social_networks 2008-08-19 14:12:19.0 San Diego Law Review, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper289'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy442007Privacy 2008-07-22 13:15:41.0 San Diego Law ReviewAssociate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School.289745GWU Law School Public Law Research PaperI've got nothing to hide and other misunderstandings of privacy442007datamining privacy 2008-05-04 04:10:01.0 In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings. San Diego Law Review745 pp.'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy442007identity privacy protection web wide world 2008-04-15 16:08:59.0 San Diego Law ReviewAssociate Professor, George Washington University Law School; J.D., Yale Law School.289745GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper{“I’VE GOT NOTHING TO HIDE” AND OTHER MISUNDERSTANDINGS OF PRIVACY}442007datamining privacy 2008-04-01 06:20:18.0 In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings. San Diego Law Review, Vol. 44, No. #, 2007"I've Got Nothing to Hide" and Other Misunderstandings of PrivacyAccepted Paper Series2007OpenSource 2007-12-08 13:01:42.0In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the "nothing to hide" argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: "I've got nothing to hide." According to the "nothing to hide" argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The "nothing to hide" argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the "nothing to hide" argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings.