<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/i-star"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>BibSonomy publications for /tag/i-star</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23f2c97c5e9dc39d4043eb80ce8b234ad/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/23f2c97c5e9dc39d4043eb80ce8b234ad/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#MasterThesis"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~jenhork/MScThesis/Thesis.pdf"/><swrc:date>Tue Jul 21 20:48:45 CEST 2009</swrc:date><swrc:school><swrc:University swrc:name="University of Toronto"/></swrc:school><swrc:title>Using i* Models for Evaluation</swrc:title><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>evaluation i-star model </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Jennifer Horkoff"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/283d17e1465e9951b7ac313c66ee2fcb6/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/283d17e1465e9951b7ac313c66ee2fcb6/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><swrc:date>Tue Jun 30 17:48:42 CEST 2009</swrc:date><swrc:address>Val Paraiso, Chile</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Ibero-American Workshop of Engineering of Requirements</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>July</swrc:month><swrc:title>Comparing GORE Frameworks: i-star and KAOS   </swrc:title><swrc:year>2009</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>i-star kaos requirements </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE) 
is an approach to requirements engineering dealing with intentionality in accordance with the relations among different actors. KAOS and i* (i-star) frameworks have been receiving many references as being important GORE proposals. This paper presents an conceptual analysis comparing characteristics of those methods giving examples related to actors’ relations definition, goal organizational model, tasks 
representation, risk analysis, and non-functional requirements. The aim of this work is to show both frameworks benefits and drawbacks. We believe that this analysis helps the understanding of the core concepts of GORE as well as it draws attention to key representation issues for both KAOS and i*.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Vera Maria Bejamim Werneck"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Antonio de Padua Albuquerque Oliveira"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cc017ad2a658f821a124983891c04f6c/mschuber"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2cc017ad2a658f821a124983891c04f6c/mschuber"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Book"/><swrc:date>Wed May 21 10:06:29 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:address>Boston/Dordrecht/London</swrc:address><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Kluwer Academic Publishers"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering</swrc:title><swrc:year>2000</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2000 RE book engineering i-star requirement to-read </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Lawrence Chung"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Brian A. Nixon"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Eric Yu"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="John Mylopoulos"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e308fa04b0a6a2b95942ad46983b46e0/mschuber"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2e308fa04b0a6a2b95942ad46983b46e0/mschuber"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><swrc:date>Tue May 13 09:35:42 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:booktitle>Requirements Engineering Conference, 2007. RE &#039;07. 15th IEEE International</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>53-56</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Tracing and Validating Goal Aspects</swrc:title><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2007 RE engineering goals i-star requirement </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Aspects promote a clear separation of concerns so that
tangled and scattered concerns are modularized throughout
software development. We propose a framework to trace aspects
identified during goal-oriented requirements analysis
to code and testing. Two types of checks are performed to
validate the resulting system in light of stakeholders’ crosscutting
concerns. One ensures that systems with and without
aspects have the same functionality defined by the hard
goals. The other checks whether the weaved system with
aspects indeed improves system qualities in terms of the degree
of softgoal satisfaction. We demonstrate the approach
using an open-source e-commerce platform.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Yijun Yu"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Nan Niu"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="John Mylopoulos"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Steve Easterbrook"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Bruno Gonzalez-Baixauli"/></rdf:_5><rdf:_6><swrc:Person swrc:name="William Candillon"/></rdf:_6><rdf:_7><swrc:Person swrc:name="Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite"/></rdf:_7><rdf:_8><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gilles Vanwormhoudt"/></rdf:_8></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f4d61a4003e6c86c2b89dbf032efd0bc/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2f4d61a4003e6c86c2b89dbf032efd0bc/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://neilernst.net/docs/pubs/paper142.pdf"/><swrc:date>Wed Oct 31 22:26:57 CET 2007</swrc:date><swrc:address>Los Angeles</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Conference on Systems Engineering Research</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>April</swrc:month><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="INCOSE"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Integrating requirements engineering and cognitive work analysis: A case study</swrc:title><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>complexity i-star openome personal systems </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Neil A. Ernst"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Greg Jamieson"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="J. Mylopoulos"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2179d71111ee7829c6d2be29f5022ee72/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2179d71111ee7829c6d2be29f5022ee72/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=566873"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 02 22:56:50 CET 2007</swrc:date><swrc:address>Annapolis, Maryland</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>International Symposium on Requirements Engineering</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>226--235</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering</swrc:title><swrc:year>1997</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>i-star model requirements software 1406 </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Requirements are usually understood as stating what a system is supposed to do, as apposed to how it should do it. However, understanding the organizational context and rationales (the â€œWhysâ€) that lead up to systems requirements can be just as important for the ongoing success of the system. Requirements modelling techniques can be used to help deal with the knowledge and reasoning needed in this earlier phase of requirements engineering. However most existing requirements techniques are intended more for the later phase of requirements engineering, which focuses on completeness, consistency, and automated verification of requirements. In contrast, the early phase aims to model and analyze stakeholder interests and how they might be addressed, or compromised, by various system-and-environment alternatives. This paper argues, therefore, that a different kind of modelling and reasoning support is needed for the early phase. An outline of the i* framework is given as an example of a step in this direction. Meeting scheduling is used as a domain example</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="166377" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Eric S. Yu"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/297bf69653be0ae6d3484112306689f16/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/297bf69653be0ae6d3484112306689f16/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#MasterThesis"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~janeyou/#Evolvement"/><swrc:date>Mon Sep 18 06:26:07 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:school><swrc:University swrc:name="University of Toronto"/></swrc:school><swrc:title>Using Meta-model Driven Views to Address Scalability in i*</swrc:title><swrc:year>2004</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>i-star modeling openome requirements visualization </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>This thesis proposes an extension to the i* framework to address scalability
	issues. The notion of â€œviewâ€� is exploited to selectively present
	portions of an i* â€œbaseline modelâ€�, which contains all modeled
	objects for a given application using i* notations. We first reformulate
	the i* framework and define four types of viewsâ€”Actor Class, Strategic
	Dependency, Strategic Rationale, and Evaluation Results. Next, we
	define sub view types based on the four types of views and supply
	a view management framework. The views and sub-views are defined
	using meta-models, and formalized using the Telos conceptual modeling
	language. Each view type is associated with a formally defined â€œselection
	ruleâ€� so that the projection of a specific view from a baseline
	model can be automated. Relationships among views are depicted in
	View Maps. Illustrative examples are taken from the London Ambulance
	Service and the Trusted Computing Group case studies.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="594630" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Jane You"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/208b20a42b209f465dc7b7ed5fd615216/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/208b20a42b209f465dc7b7ed5fd615216/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://gnomo.fe.up.pt/~wer2005/docs/papers/Ilca2.pdf"/><swrc:date>Mon Sep 18 06:26:07 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:address>Porto, Portugal</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Workshop em Engenharia de Requisitos (WER)</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>June</swrc:month><swrc:pages>148--160</swrc:pages><swrc:title>A Survey of Good Practices and Misuses for Modelling with i* Framework</swrc:title><swrc:year>2005</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>goal modeling survey i-star requirements </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>The i* framework has been increasingly used by the requirements engineering
	community. However, good practices are not always followed. Many
	papers have presented the use of i* constructs in such ways that
	results are not coherent with their original specifications. Some
	cases attempt to adapt the framework to specific needs by misusing
	its elements. In other situations, misuses are due to wrong interpretations
	of i* syntax and semantic. Unfortunately, many of these misuses
	may lead to wrong interpretations of the models by other people
	using i*. This work carried out a survey on several published papers
	to collect both good practices and misuses of the framework. It
	aims to help requirements engineers to use the i* framework in its
	full capacity.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="4" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="714548" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ilca Webster"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Juliana Amaral"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2093bd82187caf6870c65d6ba5032aa39/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2093bd82187caf6870c65d6ba5032aa39/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><swrc:date>Mon Sep 18 06:26:07 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:address>San Francisco, CA, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>July</swrc:month><swrc:title>A Comparative Analysis of i* Agent-Oriented Modelling Techniques</swrc:title><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>modeling i-star empirical </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="4" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="714552" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="- discusses various approaches to i-star modeling, assesses tools
	like OME." swrc:key="comment"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gemma Grau"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Carlos Cares"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Xavier Franch"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Fredy Navarrete"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20afd4d0d7fb086f8875a2f1f6d37827d/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/20afd4d0d7fb086f8875a2f1f6d37827d/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1628936"/><swrc:date>Mon Sep 18 06:26:07 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Software, IEEE</swrc:journal><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>26--33</swrc:pages><swrc:title>e-Service Design Using i* and e3value Modeling</swrc:title><swrc:volume>23</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>evolution i-star complexity </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>e-Services are intangible products, provisioned via the Internet.
	Examples include Internet access and Internet radio. Because most
	e-services involve multiple enterprises, creating a shared understanding
	of the service under development is an issue. Such an e-service
	is more difficult to understand than a proposition just consisting
	of goods because services lack easily observable physical properties.
	Consequently, software engineers must first understand the e-service
	itself before they can build effective systems and support for these
	services. The authors present the complementary use of two requirements
	engineering techniques. Using i* modeling, they explore strategic
	goals that enterprises have, and using e3value modeling, they understand
	how these goals can result in profitable services for enterprises.
	They demonstrate their approach using a case study on Internet radio.This
	article is part of a special issue on requirements engineering.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="745428" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="J. Gordijn"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="E. Yu"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="B. van der Raadt"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20afd4d0d7fb086f8875a2f1f6d37827d/fink08"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/20afd4d0d7fb086f8875a2f1f6d37827d/fink08"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1628936"/><swrc:date>Sun Sep 17 06:41:48 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Software, IEEE</swrc:journal><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>26--33</swrc:pages><swrc:title>e-Service Design Using i* and e3value Modeling</swrc:title><swrc:volume>23</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>evolution i-star complexity </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>e-Services are intangible products, provisioned via the Internet. Examples include Internet access and Internet radio. Because most e-services involve multiple enterprises, creating a shared understanding of the service under development is an issue. Such an e-service is more difficult to understand than a proposition just consisting of goods because services lack easily observable physical properties. Consequently, software engineers must first understand the e-service itself before they can build effective systems and support for these services. The authors present the complementary use of two requirements engineering techniques. Using i* modeling, they explore strategic goals that enterprises have, and using e3value modeling, they understand how these goals can result in profitable services for enterprises. They demonstrate their approach using a case study on Internet radio.This article is part of a special issue on requirements engineering.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="745428" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="J. Gordijn"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="E. Yu"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="B. van der Raadt"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2af935c08729f5bc37ea51e2f8cd94f41/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2af935c08729f5bc37ea51e2f8cd94f41/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=882477.883629"/><swrc:date>Sat Sep 09 19:26:51 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:address>Washington, DC, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>RE &#039;01: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE &#039;01)</swrc:booktitle><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="IEEE Computer Society"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Requirements Engineering for Complex Collaborative Systems</swrc:title><swrc:year>2001</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>engineering i-star hci requirements complexity </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="251210" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="- are scenarios exhaustive of the solution space (clearly not, but they might provide asymptotic coverage and be &#039;near nuff&#039;)
- use weights to analyze dependencies on particular actors in i*
- use SRK taxonomy to analyze task loads, and use linguistics to analyze discourse acts and implications for dependee
- the idea that one person is a single pt of failure is part of any chain-of-command system, surely.
- &#034;coupling analysis fits within the tradition of distributed cognition&#034;" swrc:key="comment"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Alistair Sutcliffe"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ff49ecacc15577acd097276736f503e3/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2ff49ecacc15577acd097276736f503e3/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://dit.unitn.it/%7Epgiorgio/papers/atal01.pdf.gz"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 24 16:34:33 CET 2006</swrc:date><swrc:address>Seattle, WA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Eighth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-2001)</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>August</swrc:month><swrc:title>A Goal-Based Organizational Perspective on Multi-Agent Architectures</swrc:title><swrc:year>2001</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>goal i-star cognition 1406 </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="3" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="130461" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="M. Kolp"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="P. Giorgini"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="J. Mylopoulos"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/252832d8418a1b383ea050e0799464a40/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/252832d8418a1b383ea050e0799464a40/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://se.uwaterloo.ca/%7Estraw03/finals/BastosCastroMylopoulos.pdf"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 24 16:34:33 CET 2006</swrc:date><swrc:address>Portland, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of Second International Workshop From Software Requirements to Architectures (STRAW&#039;03)</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>May</swrc:month><swrc:title>Integrating Organizational Requirements and Socio-Intentional Architectural Styles</swrc:title><swrc:year>2003</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>goal i-star requirements 1406 organization </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="4" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="130465" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="LÃºcia R. D. Bastos"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Jaelson F. B. Castro"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="John Mylopoulos"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/207c4bfbd96f9ea6ff8c3cfd217bd48ed/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/207c4bfbd96f9ea6ff8c3cfd217bd48ed/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1334782"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 24 16:34:33 CET 2006</swrc:date><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings 7th Intl. Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution</swrc:booktitle><swrc:journal>Software Evolution, 2004. Proceedings. 7th International Workshop on Principles of</swrc:journal><swrc:pages>159--164</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Co-evolution of complementary formal and informal requirements</swrc:title><swrc:year>2004</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>formal i-star requirements </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Agent-oriented Conceptual Modelling (AoCM, as exemplified by the i* notation by E. Yu (1995)), represents an interesting approach to modelling early phase requirements that is particularly effective in capturing organizational contexts, stake-holder intentions and rationale. There are significant benefits in using formal methods for the development of computer systems and improving their quality. We propose a methodology which permits the use of these two otherwise disparate approaches in a complementary and synergistic fashion for requirements engineering.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="3" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="272257" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="A. Krishna"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="A. K. Ghose"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="S. A. Vilkomir"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/290dcb13bfb917c603c95fdc5b4739cd7/neilernst"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/290dcb13bfb917c603c95fdc5b4739cd7/neilernst"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/670832.html"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 24 16:34:33 CET 2006</swrc:date><swrc:address>Toronto</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering</swrc:booktitle><swrc:journal>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</swrc:journal><swrc:month>May</swrc:month><swrc:pages>328--343</swrc:pages><swrc:title>SNet: A modeling and simulation environment for agent networks based on i* and ConGolog</swrc:title><swrc:volume>3248</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2002</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>agent modeling i-star requirements simulation </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>SNet is a prototype environment supporting the representation and dynamic evaluation of designs for social networks comprising human, hardware, and software agents. The environment employs metadata management technology to integrate an extended version of the i* formalism for static network modeling with the ConGolog logicbased activity simulator. The paper de nes the formal mappings necessary to achieve the integration and describes an operational prototype demonstration. SNet&#039;s...</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0" swrc:key="priority"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="389259" swrc:key="citeulike-article-id"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="- ConGoLog: Concurrent GoLog
- IndiGoLog: Independent Look-ahead (planning)
- GOlog is a language for expressing the changes in a &#039;situation&#039; which is a set of conditions pertaining to particular location in time/space.  
- fluent: a logical predicate whose value varies during the task
- they&#039;ve implemented a i* extension that uses IndiGoLog and can be used to run simulations on i* models (with precise semantics).
- no word on where the tool is." swrc:key="comment"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="G. Gans"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="M. Jarke"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="G. Lakemeyer"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="T. Vits"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><foaf:Group rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/i-star"><foaf:name>i-star</foaf:name><description>Community for tag(s) i-star</description></foaf:Group></rdf:RDF>
