<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/neurocognitive"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>BibSonomy publications for /tag/neurocognitive</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20db43ca8d6d5fa0ff0924d062be97319/brian.mingus"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/20db43ca8d6d5fa0ff0924d062be97319/brian.mingus"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Tue Sep 16 23:39:07 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Trends in Cognitive Sciences</swrc:journal><swrc:number>2</swrc:number><swrc:pages>93-102</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Observing the transformation of experience into memory</swrc:title><swrc:volume>6</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2002</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>ActivityMemoryNeuronsneural CCP Cognitive JRR, Learning Memory2343 Memory2520 Neurology, Neuropsychology ProcessesElectrical \&amp; episodic formation; memoriesEpisodic memory neurocognitive processes; processing; recall; responses; </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ken A. Paller"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Anthony D. Wagner"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a06ce676bac26a66209cfbfdd0edfc2e/yish"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2a06ce676bac26a66209cfbfdd0edfc2e/yish"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/~raymond/mar%20in%20press_neuropsychology%20of%20narrative_corrected%20proofs.pdf"/><swrc:date>Fri Apr 27 14:00:02 CEST 2007</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Neuropsychologia</swrc:journal><swrc:number>10</swrc:number><swrc:pages>1414-–1434</swrc:pages><swrc:title>The neuropsychology of narrative: story comprehension, story production and their interrelation (review)</swrc:title><swrc:volume>42</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2004</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>CiHB IJCEELL brain cerme6 damage dicourse frontal jime08 language lobe mythesis narrative neurocognitive neuroimaging neurology neuropsychology neuroscience neurosome review </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Stories are used extensively for human communication; both the comprehension and production of oral and written narratives constitute
a fundamental part of our experience. While study of this topic has largely been the domain of cognitive psychology, neuroscience has also
made progress in uncovering the processes underlying these abilities. In an attempt to synthesize work from both literatures, this review: (1)
summarizes the current neuroimaging and patient research pertaining to narrative comprehension and production, (2) attempts to integrate
this information with the processes described by the discourse models of cognitive psychology, and (3) uses this information to examine
the possible interrelation between comprehension and production. Story comprehension appears to entail a network of frontal, temporal
and cingulate areas that support working-memory and theory-of-mind processes. The specific functions associated with these areas are
congruent with the processes proposed by cognitive models of comprehension. Moreover, these same areas appear necessary for story
production, and the causal-temporal ordering of selected information may partially account for this common ground. A basic description
of comprehension and production based solely on neuropsychological evidence is presented to complement current cognitive models, and
a number of avenues for future research are suggested.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="42" swrc:key="issue"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Raymond A. Mar"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fcd67e5b41142eb91a07ceac48ed2804/yish"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2fcd67e5b41142eb91a07ceac48ed2804/yish"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.psych.nmsu.edu/~jkroger/lab/pubs/NYAS.doc"/><swrc:date>Fri Apr 27 13:20:05 CEST 2007</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Structure and functions of the human prefrontal cortex</swrc:booktitle><swrc:journal>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</swrc:journal><swrc:number>1</swrc:number><swrc:pages>253-264</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="New York Academy of Sciences"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Forms of reasoning: Insight into prefrontal functions?</swrc:title><swrc:volume>769</swrc:volume><swrc:year>1995</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>CiHB IJCEELL cerme6 context cortex events learning mythesis narrative neurocognitive prefrontal </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>In this paper we consider the prospects for linking research on the psychology of thinking and reasoning with research on the structure and functions of prefrontal cortex.  It is generally accepted that damage to the prefrontal cortex leads to deficits in planning, complex learning, attentional control, and memory for the spatio-temporal context of events.  However, these deficits do not correspond in any straightforward manner to the varieties of thinking as typically defined by cognitive psychologists, which include deductive and inductive inference, categorization, judgment and decision making, and problem solving. We consider whether certain central representational and processing elements postulated by cognitive theories of human thinking -- symbols and variables, analogical mapping, and conditional rules -- can be linked with models of frontal functions.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38143.x" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Keith J. Holyoak"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="James K. Kroger"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="J. Grafman"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Keith J. Holyoak"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="F. Boller"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28286f7b7076a12a7f63da71f21dabf38/yish"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/28286f7b7076a12a7f63da71f21dabf38/yish"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.psych.nmsu.edu/~jkroger/lab/pubs/kroger_on_ruchkin.rtf"/><swrc:date>Mon Aug 14 15:55:12 CEST 2006</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Behavior and Brain Sciences</swrc:journal><swrc:number>6</swrc:number><swrc:pages>744--745</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Long-term memories, features, and novelty</swrc:title><swrc:volume>26</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2003</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>neurocognitive memory IJCEELL short-term mind narrative long-term neuroscience </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="James K. Kroger"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><foaf:Group rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/tag/neurocognitive"><foaf:name>neurocognitive</foaf:name><description>Community for tag(s) neurocognitive</description></foaf:Group></rdf:RDF>
