BibSonomy publications for /tag/tagging,Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010Workshop on Social Web Search and Mining, 17th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW '08), Beijing, ChinaApril1--8{O}n the {E}ffect of {G}roup {S}tructures on {R}anking {S}trategies in {F}olksonomies2008folksonomies, gfolkrank, ranking, search tagging, Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 20102008 IEEE / WIC / ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2008, 9-12 December 2008, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Main Conference Proceedings148-154{E}xploiting Additional {C}ontext for {G}raph-Based {T}ag {R}ecommendations in {F}olksonomy {S}ystems2008folkrank, folksonomies, gfolkrank recommender social systems, tagging, Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010Weaving Services and People on the World Wide Web14275-300{O}n the {E}ffect of {G}roup {S}tructures on {R}anking {S}trategies in {F}olksonomies2009groupme, ranking search, social tagging, web, Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010Proceedings of the Second Ph.D. Workshop in CIKM, PIKM 2008, Napa Valley, California, USA, October 30, 200849-56The benefit of additional semantics in folksonomy systems2008context, folksonomies, grank semantic semantics, social tagging, web, Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010WEBIST 2009 - Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Lisbon, Portugal, March 23-26, 2009167-174{C}ontext-aware {R}anking {A}lgorithms in {F}olksonomies2009folksonomies, ranking, search, social tagging, web Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 20108th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC '09), Poster TrackOctoberMulti-faceted {T}agging in {T}ag{M}e!2009context, flickr social tagging, tagme, web, In this paper we present TagMe!, a tagging and exploration front-end for Flickr images, which enables users to add categories to tag assignments and to attach tag assignments to a specific area within an image. We analyze the differences between tags and categories and show how both facets can be applied to learn semantic relations between concepts referenced by tags and categories. Further, we discuss how the multi-faceted tagging helps to improve the retrieval of folksonomy entities. The TagMe! system is currently available at http://tagme.groupme.orgSun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 20106th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2010)AprilThe {A}rt of multi-faceted {T}agging -- {Interweaving spatial annotations, categories, meaningful URIs and tags}2010annotations, context, flickr spatial tagging, tagme, Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010Annals of Information Systems -- Web 2.0 \& Semantic WebApril25--54Semantic Enhancement of Social Tagging Systems62009groupme, socialtagging, tagging, tags Social tagging systems have shown an impressive potential for information discovery and exploration. Enriched with Semantic Web technologies, they enable to tap valuable metadata about Web resources and to detect hidden relations, thus, to capture information about both content and context of the resources. In this article, we propose a novel way to combine semantic technologies with Web 2.0 paradigms. We introduce the GroupMe! system, which extends current social tagging systems by giving users more flexibility in organizing and maintaining Web content. In GroupMe!, users can create groups of Web resources they consider relevant by simple drag & drop operations. They can tag and share their groups and Web content with fellow users and benefit from improved search and retrieval capabilities. We evaluate the GroupMe! approach and investigate on the effect of grouping resources for search in tag-based social systems. Our experiments show that the quality of search result ranking can be significantly improved by introducing and exploiting the grouping of resources. Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010HT'10, Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 13-16, 2010June299-300Leveraging Multi-faceted Tagging to improve Search in Folksonomy Systems2010context, folksonomy ranking, systems, tagging, tagme Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 7th Extended Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2010, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 30 - June 3, 2010, Proceedings, Part IIMayLecture Notes in Computer ScienceThe Impact of Multifaceted Tagging on Learning Tag Relations and Search60892010categories, context, eswc, folkrank, learning media, ranking, relations search, semantics semantics, social tag tagging, tagme, Sun Dec 19 23:00:40 CET 2010User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, 18th International Conference, UMAP 2010, Big Island, HI, USA, June 20-24, 2010. Proceedings16-27Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceInterweaving Public User Profiles on the Web60752010aggregation, api, graph grapple, gumf, linking, modeling, mypes, networking profile profiles, social tag-based tagging, user web, Thu May 13 11:34:37 CEST 2010Intl. Workshop on Recommender SystemsSocial Ranking: Finding Relevant Content in Web 2.02008IR, Tagging, ranking, social web Social (or folksonomic) tagging has become a very popular way to describe, categorise, search, discover and navigate content within Web 2.0 websites. Unlike taxonomies, which overimpose a hierarchical categorisation of content, folksonomies empower end users by enabling them to freely create and choose the categories (in this case, tags) that best describe some content. However, as tags are informally defined, continually changing, and ungoverned, social tagging has often been criticised for lowering, rather than increasing, the efficiency of searching, due to the number of synonyms, homonyms, polysemy, as well as the heterogeneity of users and the noise they introduce. In this paper, we propose a method to increase the efficiency of searches within Web 2.0 that is grounded on recommender system techniques. We measure users' similarity based on their past tag activity. We infer tags' relationships based on their association to content. We then propose a mechanism to answer a user's query that ranks (recommends) content based on the inferred semantic distance of the query to the tags associated to such content, weighted by the similarity of the querying user to the users who created those tags. We evaluate the effectiveness of this mechanism when performing searches on the CiteULike dataset. Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 2010Folksonomy Coinage and Definition2007Folksonomies, definition folksonomy, tagging, This page is a static permanent web document. It has been written to provide a place to cite the coinage of folksonomy. This is response the request from many in the academic community to document the circumstances and date of the creation of the term folksonomy. The definition at creation is also part of this document. This document pulls together bits of conversations and ideas I wrote regarding folksonomy on listserves, e-mail, in my blogs and in blog comments on other's sites in 2004.Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 2010Explaining and Showing Broad and Narrow Folksonomies2005Folksonomies, definition folksonomy, tagging, This page is a static permanent web document. It has been written to provide a place to cite the coinage of folksonomy. This is response the request from many in the academic community to document the circumstances and date of the creation of the term folksonomy. The definition at creation is also part of this document. This document pulls together bits of conversations and ideas I wrote regarding folksonomy on listserves, e-mail, in my blogs and in blog comments on other's sites in 2004.Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 2010WWW2007 workshopSemkey: A semantic collaborative tagging system2007collaborative knowledge organization, semantic semantics systems, tagging tagging, web, Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 20105A first peek at the data2008blog tagging, Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 20105Open Research -- Research Goals2008blog tagging, Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 20105Open Research2008blog tagging, Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 2010Las VegasProceedings Information Architecture Summit 2007@toread and Cool: Tagging for Time, Task and Emotion2007Python affective, iasummit, tagging, tags, time-and-task, This paper examines the use of non subject related tags in three social bookmarking tools (Del.icio.us, Connotea and Citeulike). Previous studies of Del.icio.us and Citeulike determined that many common tags are not directly subject related but are in fact affective tags dwelling on a user's emotional response to a document or are time and task related tags related to a users current projects or activities. A set of non subject tags from the previous studies was used to collect posts with non subject tags from the three listed social bookmarking tools. These tags have been analysed to examine their role in the tagging process. Thu Jan 07 13:57:09 CET 2010Regensburgin VorbereitungSocial Tagging Systems and the Notion of Affordance. A Comparative Analysis of User Keywords for Different Digital Resource Types2008Design, Documentation, Factors, Human Social affordance, analysis, annotation comparative experimentation, functions, system tag tagging, tagging,Community for tag(s) tagging,