<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/acf/framework"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>BibSonomy publications for /user/acf/framework</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b7ebb372eff855eb319013d79c75d063/acf"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2b7ebb372eff855eb319013d79c75d063/acf"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Tue Apr 29 10:52:37 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Research Policy</swrc:journal><swrc:number>7</swrc:number><swrc:pages>1091--1114</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Elsevier"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>{Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s
	transitional context}</swrc:title><swrc:volume>30</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2001</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>framework transition R&amp;D China innovation central_planning </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>This paper proposes a generic framework for analyzing innovation systems,
	anchored around five fundamental activities — R&amp;D, implementation,
	end-use, education, linkage — and focused on the performance implications
	of a system’s structure and dynamics. Rather than simply describing
	the role and performance of particular actors, institutions and policies,
	this approach focuses on system-level characteristics, including
	the distribution of these activities within the system, the organizational
	boundaries around them, coordination mechanisms, evolutionary processes,
	and the effectiveness of the system in introducing, diffusing and
	exploiting technological innovations. The framework is applied to
	a comparison of China’s national innovation system under central
	planning and since reforms, revealing the evolving structure and
	dynamics of this system and current inconsistencies and perverse
	incentives that policymakers must address to realize their development
	goals. More generally, it provides a basis for addressing the implicit
	assumptions of organizational types, roles and convergence among
	innovation systems emerging in very different contexts, whether national,
	regional or industrial.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2008.04.29" swrc:key="timestamp"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="acf" swrc:key="owner"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00132-3" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="X. Liu"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="S. White"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>