<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/callagialla/(Planning)PERT"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>BibSonomy publications for /user/callagialla/(Planning)PERT</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/280d38f769c92d1c27a6b0d6dba0ef830/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/280d38f769c92d1c27a6b0d6dba0ef830/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Thu Mar 20 21:20:07 CET 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Project  Management Journal</swrc:journal><swrc:number>1</swrc:number><swrc:pages>27-36</swrc:pages><swrc:title>WHY A CRITICAL PATH BY ANY OTHER NAME WOULD SMELL LESS SWEET?</swrc:title><swrc:volume>36</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2005</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>path ACTIVITY-based (Network makingNETWORK analysis ChainTheory SCHEDULINGPERT/CPM costingCRITICAL constraints analysis)THEORY of ConstraintsPROJECT (Management)Critical analysisDECISION (Planning)PERT </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>To maximize the potential of Critical Chain (CC) to enrich project management practice, I discuss Eliyahu Goldratt&#039;s work in the context of his entrepreneurial career. I show that PERT/CPM had been an instance of Goldratt&#039;s ‘Theory of Constraints’ (TOC) before Goldratt had articulated it. I also highlight errors and questionable recommendations he made. Nonetheless, CC provides a more holistic approach than the typical practice before. I (1) discuss CC and TOC, including strengths and weaknesses, in the relevant context; (2) provide earlier sources for the major so-called Goldratt innovations; (3) identify opportunities for immediate improvement and future research highlighted by Goldratt&#039;s work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="8756-9728" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Dan Trietsch"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>