<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/callagialla/CIC"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>BibSonomy publications for /user/callagialla/CIC</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20e29df466045a36fbed72ef31dbe8a68/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/20e29df466045a36fbed72ef31dbe8a68/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Sun Apr 20 16:52:53 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>R&amp;D Management</swrc:journal><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>251-272</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Users’ contributions to radical innovation: evidence from four 
cases in the ﬁeld of medical equipment technology 

</swrc:title><swrc:volume>36</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>innovation radical open CIC </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>This paper focuses on contributions of users in early phases of radical innovation projects. In a 
multiple case study analysis in the ﬁeld of medical equipment technology, we identify 
characteristics of users who contribute substantially to the development of radical innovations 
by being their inventors and (co)-developers. These innovative users have high motivation to 
seek new solutions, possess a diverse set of competencies, and are embedded in a supportive 
environment. We furthermore observe that they play an entrepreneurial role as they establish 
and organize the required innovation networks. These innovation networks are needed to 
transform the users’ radically new concepts into ﬁrst physical prototypes and marketable 
products. The study highlights how manufacturing ﬁrms can beneﬁt from innovative and 
entrepreneurial users in the early phases of radical innovation projects. 

</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christopher Lettl"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Cornelius Herstatt"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Hans Georg Gemuenden"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2873a9bc82b8f8650bc390d9b67765c93/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2873a9bc82b8f8650bc390d9b67765c93/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W59-4CVR45D-1/1/08b95ce009a2ccaf73e807c8d0aaa12e"/><swrc:date>Sun Apr 20 16:07:25 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Journal of Management</swrc:journal><swrc:number>6</swrc:number><swrc:pages>2004</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?</swrc:title><swrc:volume>30</swrc:volume><swrc:year>805-835</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>InnoResearch CIC teams Virtual </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>In this paper, we review the research on virtual teams in an effort to assess the state of the literature. We start with an examination of the definitions of virtual teams used and propose an integrative definition that suggests that all teams may be defined in terms of their extent of virtualness. Next, we review findings related to team inputs, processes, and outcomes, and identify areas of agreement and inconsistency in the literature on virtual teams. Based on this review, we suggest avenues for future research, including methodological and theoretical considerations that are important to advancing our understanding of virtual teams.

</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Luis L. Martins"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Lucy L. Gilson"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="M. Travis Maynard"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/219f2830247e7f8e045a9d98097f83882/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/219f2830247e7f8e045a9d98097f83882/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x"/><swrc:date>Fri Apr 04 17:03:30 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>R{\&amp;}D Management</swrc:journal><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>333--346</swrc:pages><swrc:title>The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation</swrc:title><swrc:volume>36</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>innovation OI CIC open </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>As with all new ideas, the concept of Open Innovation requires extensive empirical investigation, testing and development. This paper analyzes Procter and Gamble’s ‘Connect and Develop’ strategy as a case study of the major organizational and technological changes associated with open innovation. It argues that although some of the organizational changes
accompanying open innovation are beginning to be described in the literature, more analysis is warranted into the ways technological changes have facilitated open innovation strategies, particularly related to new product development. Information and communications technologies enable the exchange of distributed sources of information in the open innovation process.
The case study shows that furthermore a suite of new technologies for data mining, simulation, prototyping and visual representation, what we call ‘innovation technology’, help to support open innovation in Procter and Gamble. The paper concludes with a suggested research agenda for furthering understanding of the role played by and consequences of this technology.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Mark Dodgson"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="David Gann"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ammon Salter"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a4e457ddeafc6691d4888931c55d435e/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2a4e457ddeafc6691d4888931c55d435e/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Fri Apr 04 16:56:26 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>wissenschaftsmanagement</swrc:journal><swrc:note>gelegentlicher Gedankenaustausch =&gt; regelmäßiger Informationsaustausch =&gt; Kollaboration =&gt; Kooperation</swrc:note><swrc:number>1</swrc:number><swrc:pages>26-32</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Innovation durch Kooperationen: Eine Bestandsaufnahme des Innovationsverhaltens in KMU</swrc:title><swrc:volume>14</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>Innovation kmu CIC innovationsverhaltens Kooperationen </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Holger Seidel"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Joerg von Garrel"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Rolf Walter"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26a686ea078cb33e1521b17b82932b6bc/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/26a686ea078cb33e1521b17b82932b6bc/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9602(197305)78:6%253C1360:TSOWT%253E2.0.CO;2-E"/><swrc:date>Wed Mar 26 11:22:30 CET 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>The American Journal of Sociology</swrc:journal><swrc:month>May</swrc:month><swrc:title>The Strength of Weak Ties</swrc:title><swrc:year>1973</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>strong weak network OpenResearch CIC social ties </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>The Strength of Weak Ties. Mark S. Granovetter. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1360-1380. May, 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties Mark S. Granovetter Johns Hopkins University Analysis </swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="13513140541979728119related:95ihLLpRiLsJ" swrc:key="pmid"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2007-06-11 17:22:07 +0200" swrc:key="added"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0" swrc:key="rating"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="papers://C3B117CD-23C4-4854-9426-AC96AFB113DA/Paper/p66" swrc:key="uri"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="file://localhost/Users/bertilhatt/Documents/Papers/Granovetter/1973/Granovetter%201973%20The%20American%20Journal%20of%20Sociology.pdf" swrc:key="url"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2008-03-13 14:35:35 +0100" swrc:key="modified"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Mark Granovetter"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2549640911e8f3f9bdea0491691445a90/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2549640911e8f3f9bdea0491691445a90/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Book"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/ASIN/3486585789/communixx"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 21 15:02:19 CET 2008</swrc:date><swrc:address>München</swrc:address><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Oldenbourg"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Enterprise 2.0 - Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen</swrc:title><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>OpenResearch CIC </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="book" swrc:key="entrytype"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Michael Koch"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Alexander Richter"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/276b861085cd8d6a485e9b2cdd14590f0/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/276b861085cd8d6a485e9b2cdd14590f0/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1277640.1277642&amp;coll=GUIDE&amp;dl=GUIDE"/><swrc:date>Fri Mar 21 14:49:15 CET 2008</swrc:date><swrc:address>Armonk, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:journal>Journal of Management Information Systems</swrc:journal><swrc:number>3</swrc:number><swrc:pages>17-43</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="M. E. Sharpe, Inc."/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Enabling Customer-Centricity Using Wikis and the Wiki Way</swrc:title><swrc:volume>23</swrc:volume><swrc:year>06-7</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>OpenResearch CIC wikis </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0742-1222" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230302" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christian Wagner"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ann Majchrzak"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29c3e2a7669aa99cfc006995995f67158/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/29c3e2a7669aa99cfc006995995f67158/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Thu Mar 20 21:24:32 CET 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>R&amp;D Management</swrc:journal><swrc:number>5</swrc:number><swrc:pages>553-568</swrc:pages><swrc:title>The Lead User Method: an Outline of Empirical Findings and Issues for Future Research</swrc:title><swrc:volume>34</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2004</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>innovationsTECHNOLOGY CIC PRODUCT Industrial management transfer, TECHNOLOGICAL Research, forecastingTECHNOLOGICAL NEW MARKETING products research, </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>In order to reduce the risks of failure usually associated with NPD, leading companies such as 3M, HILTI, or Johnson&amp;Johnson are increasingly working with so-called Lead Users. Their identification and involvement is supported by the Lead User method– a multi stage approach aiming to generate innovative new product concepts and to enhance the effectiveness of cross-functional innovation teams. While the Lead User method is frequently cited in the literature, yet, there are only limited attempts to comprehensively discuss how this approach is embedded in theories and empirical findings of innovation and marketing research. Therefore the Lead User method is in the focus of the present paper, both with respect to its theoretical foundation and its implementation into the innovation management system. First, empirical research on user innovations is reviewed to clarify the theoretical foundation of the Lead User method. Second the attention is drawn to the Lead User practice by discussing the various process steps of this specific approach on the basis of two applications of the method. Based on this discussion, we outline open questions related with the practical implementation of the Lead User method in order to start an agenda for future research. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR Copyright of R &amp; D Management is the property of Blackwell Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder&#039;s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)
In order to reduce the risks of failure usually associated with NPD, leading companies such as 3M, HILTI, or Johnson&amp;Johnson are increasingly working with so-called Lead Users. Their identification and involvement is supported by the Lead User method– a multi stage approach aiming to generate innovative new product concepts and to enhance the effectiveness of cross-functional innovation teams. While the Lead User method is frequently cited in the literature, yet, there are only limited attempts to comprehensively discuss how this approach is embedded in theories and empirical findings of innovation and marketing research. Therefore the Lead User method is in the focus of the present paper, both with respect to its theoretical foundation and its implementation into the innovation management system. First, empirical research on user innovations is reviewed to clarify the theoretical foundation of the Lead User method. Second the attention is drawn to the Lead User practice by discussing the various process steps of this specific approach on the basis of two applications of the method. Based on this discussion, we outline open questions related with the practical implementation of the Lead User method in order to start an agenda for future research. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR Copyright of R &amp; D Management is the property of Blackwell Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder&#039;s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0033-6807" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christian Lüthje"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Cornelius Herstatt"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b99c2910fc21b9a1f2d6ee54dedec37c/callagialla"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2b99c2910fc21b9a1f2d6ee54dedec37c/callagialla"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><swrc:date>Thu Mar 20 21:14:41 CET 2008</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Journal of Product Innovation Management</swrc:journal><swrc:number>4</swrc:number><swrc:pages>301-315</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead-User Theory</swrc:title><swrc:volume>23</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>products, NEW surfing, COMMERCIAL CIC KITE management, MARKETING Methodology RESOURCE innovations strategy, TECHNOLOGICAL </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Firms and governments are increasingly interested in learning to exploit the value of lead-user innovations for commercial advantage. Improvements to lead-user theory are needed to inform and to guide these efforts. The present study empirically tests and confirms the basic tenets of lead-user theory. It also uncovers some new refinements and related practical applications. Using a sample of users and user–innovators drawn from the extreme sport of kite surfing, an analysis was made of the relationship between the commercial attractiveness of innovations developed by users and the intensity of the lead-user characteristics those users display. A first empirical analysis is provided of the independent effects of its two key component variables. In the empirical study of user modifications to kite-surfing equipment, it was found that both components independently contribute to identifying commercially attractive user innovations. Component 1, the high expected-benefits dimension, predicts innovation likelihood, and component 2, the ahead of the trend dimension, predicts both the commercial attractiveness of a given set of user-developed innovations and innovation likelihood due to a newly proposed innovation supply side effect. It was concluded that the component variables in the lead-user definition are indeed independent dimensions, so neither can be dropped without loss of information—an important matter for lead-user theory. It also was found that adding measures of users&#039; local resources can improve the ability of the lead-user construct to identify commercially attractive innovations under some conditions. The findings reported here have practical as well as theoretical import. Product modification and development has been found to be a relatively common user behavior in many fields. Thus, from 10 to nearly 40 percent of users report having modified or developed a product for in-house use in the case of industrial products or for personal use... ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR Copyright of Journal of Product Innovation Management is the property of Blackwell Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder&#039;s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)
Firms and governments are increasingly interested in learning to exploit the value of lead-user innovations for commercial advantage. Improvements to lead-user theory are needed to inform and to guide these efforts. The present study empirically tests and confirms the basic tenets of lead-user theory. It also uncovers some new refinements and related practical applications. Using a sample of users and user–innovators drawn from the extreme sport of kite surfing, an analysis was made of the relationship between the commercial attractiveness of innovations developed by users and the intensity of the lead-user characteristics those users display. A first empirical analysis is provided of the independent effects of its two key component variables. In the empirical study of user modifications to kite-surfing equipment, it was found that both components independently contribute to identifying commercially attractive user innovations. Component 1, the high expected-benefits dimension, predicts innovation likelihood, and component 2, the ahead of the trend dimension, predicts both the commercial attractiveness of a given set of user-developed innovations and innovation likelihood due to a newly proposed innovation supply side effect. It was concluded that the component variables in the lead-user definition are indeed independent dimensions, so neither can be dropped without loss of information—an important matter for lead-user theory. It also was found that adding measures of users&#039; local resources can improve the ability of the lead-user construct to identify commercially attractive innovations under some conditions. The findings reported here have practical as well as theoretical import. Product modification and development has been found to be a relatively common user behavior in many fields. Thus, from 10 to nearly 40 percent of users report having modified or developed a product for in-house use in the case of industrial products or for personal use... ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR Copyright of Journal of Product Innovation Management is the property of Blackwell Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder&#039;s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts)</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0737-6782" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Nikolaus Franke"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Eric Von Hippel"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Martin Schreier"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>