<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/eswc2008/scenarios"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>BibSonomy publications for /user/eswc2008/scenarios</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bfc09b600bc356d29ab2c236fa8216ed/eswc2008"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2bfc09b600bc356d29ab2c236fa8216ed/eswc2008"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://data.semanticweb.org/conference/eswc/2008/papers/188"/><swrc:date>Wed May 28 14:49:59 CEST 2008</swrc:date><swrc:address>Berlin, Heidelberg</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of the 5th European Semantic Web Conference</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>June</swrc:month><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Springer Verlag"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:series>LNCS</swrc:series><swrc:title>Putting ontology alignment in context: usage scenarios, deployment and evaluation in a library case</swrc:title><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>alignment evaluation usage ontology scenarios thesaurus ontology-alignment </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Thesaurus alignment plays an important role in realising efficient access to heterogeneous Cultural Heritage data. Current ontology alignment techniques, however, provide only limited value for such access as they consider little if any requirements from realistic use cases or application scenarios. In this paper, we focus on two real-world scenarios in a library context: thesaurus merging and book re-indexing. We identify their particular requirements and describe our approach of deploying and evaluating thesaurus alignment techniques in this context. We have applied our approach for the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative, and report on the performance evaluation of participants’ tools wrt. the application scenario at hand. It shows that evaluations of tools requires significant effort, but when done carefully, brings many benefits.</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Antoine Isaac"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Henk Matthezing"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Lourens van der Meij"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Stefan Schlobach"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Shenghui Wang"/></rdf:_5><rdf:_6><swrc:Person swrc:name="Claus Zinn"/></rdf:_6></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Manfred Hauswirth"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Manolis Koubarakis"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Sean Bechhofer"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
