<rdf:RDF xmlns:community="http://www.bibsonomy.org/ontologies/2008/05/community#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" xmlns:swrc="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xml:base="http://www.bibsonomy.org/user/jaeschke/folksonomy"><owl:Ontology rdf:about=""><rdfs:comment>BibSonomy publications for /user/jaeschke/folksonomy</rdfs:comment><owl:imports rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology/portal"/></owl:Ontology><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/287d6883ebd98e8810be45d7e7e4ade96/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/287d6883ebd98e8810be45d7e7e4ade96/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Book"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.springer.com/computer/database+management+%26+information+retrieval/book/978-1-4614-1893-1"/><swrc:date>Mon Feb 13 12:52:23 CET 2012</swrc:date><swrc:month>feb</swrc:month><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Springer"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:series>SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering</swrc:series><swrc:title>Recommender Systems for Social Tagging Systems</swrc:title><swrc:year>2012</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2012 bookmarking collaborative folksonomy myown recommender social tagging </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Social Tagging Systems are web applications in which users upload resources (e.g., bookmarks, videos, photos, etc.) and annotate it with a list of freely chosen keywords called tags. This is a grassroots approach to organize a site and help users to find the resources they are interested in. Social tagging systems are open and inherently social; features that have been proven to encourage participation. However, with the large popularity of these systems and the increasing amount of user-contributed content, information overload rapidly becomes an issue. Recommender Systems are well known applications for increasing the level of relevant content over the “noise” that continuously grows as more and more content becomes available online. In social tagging systems, however, we face new challenges. While in classic recommender systems the mode of recommendation is basically the resource, in social tagging systems there are three possible modes of recommendation: users, resources, or tags. Therefore suitable methods that properly exploit the different dimensions of social tagging systems data are needed. In this book, we survey the most recent and state-of-the-art work about a whole new generation of recommender systems built to serve social tagging systems. The book is divided into self-contained chapters covering the background material on social tagging systems and recommender systems to the more advanced techniques like the ones based on tensor factorization and graph-based models.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-4614-1893-1" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="L. Balby Marinho"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="A. Hotho"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="R. Jäschke"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="A. Nanopoulos"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="S. Rendle"/></rdf:_5><rdf:_6><swrc:Person swrc:name="L. Schmidt-Thieme"/></rdf:_6><rdf:_7><swrc:Person swrc:name="G. Stumme"/></rdf:_7><rdf:_8><swrc:Person swrc:name="P. Symeonidis"/></rdf:_8></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27d41d332cccc3e7ba8e7dadfb7996337/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/27d41d332cccc3e7ba8e7dadfb7996337/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InCollection"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25694-3_3"/><swrc:date>Mon Feb 06 13:47:57 CET 2012</swrc:date><swrc:address>Berlin/Heidelberg</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Recommender Systems for the Social Web</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>65--87</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Springer"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:series>Intelligent Systems Reference Library</swrc:series><swrc:title>Challenges in Tag Recommendations for Collaborative Tagging Systems</swrc:title><swrc:volume>32</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2012</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2012 bookmarking challenge collaborative dc09 discovery folksonomy myown recommender rsdc08 social tagging </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Originally introduced by social bookmarking systems, collaborative tagging, or social tagging, has been widely adopted by many web-based systems like wikis, e-commerce platforms, or social networks. Collaborative tagging systems allow users to annotate resources using freely chosen keywords, so called tags . Those tags help users in finding/retrieving resources, discovering new resources, and navigating through the system. The process of tagging resources is laborious. Therefore, most systems support their users by tag recommender components that recommend tags in a personalized way. The Discovery Challenges 2008 and 2009 of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML PKDD) tackled the problem of tag recommendations in collaborative tagging systems. Researchers were invited to test their methods in a competition on datasets from the social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy. Moreover, the 2009 challenge included an online task where the recommender systems were integrated into BibSonomy and provided recommendations in real time. In this chapter we review, evaluate and summarize the submissions to the two Discovery Challenges and thus lay the groundwork for continuing research in this area.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-3-642-25694-3" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Knowledge &amp; Data Engineering Group, University of Kassel, Wilhelmshöher Allee 73, 34121 Kassel, Germany" swrc:key="affiliation"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1007/978-3-642-25694-3_3" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Robert Jäschke"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Andreas Hotho"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Folke Mitzlaff"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Stumme"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="José J. Pazos Arias"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ana Fernández Vilas"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Rebeca P. Díaz Redondo"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f022e60c5928e01c701d7ec539ec221b/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2f022e60c5928e01c701d7ec539ec221b/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2043932.2043945"/><swrc:date>Wed Dec 21 22:52:09 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>45--52</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="ACM"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Personalized PageRank vectors for tag recommendations: inside FolkRank</swrc:title><swrc:year>2011</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>bookmarking collaborative folkrank folksonomy ranking search tagging web pagerank </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>This paper looks inside FolkRank, one of the well-known folksonomy-based algorithms, to present its fundamental properties and promising possibilities for improving performance in tag recommendations. Moreover, we introduce a new way to compute a differential approach in FolkRank by representing it as a linear combination of the personalized PageRank vectors. By the linear combination, we present FolkRank&#039;s probabilistic interpretation that grasps how FolkRank works on a folksonomy graph in terms of the random surfer model. We also propose new FolkRank-like methods for tag recommendations to efficiently compute tags&#039; rankings and thus reduce expensive computational cost of FolkRank. We show that the FolkRank approaches are feasible to recommend tags in real-time scenarios as well. The experimental evaluations show that the proposed methods provide fast tag recommendations with reasonable quality, as compared to FolkRank. Additionally, we discuss the diversity of the top n tags recommended by FolkRank and its variants.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="2043945" swrc:key="acmid"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Chicago, Illinois, USA" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-4503-0683-6" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="8" swrc:key="numpages"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1145/2043932.2043945" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Heung-Nam Kim"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Abdulmotaleb El Saddik"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d44d1c9a48f5b676388ffbc90c7577ba/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2d44d1c9a48f5b676388ffbc90c7577ba/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1379092.1379110"/><swrc:date>Mon Dec 05 18:36:22 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>81--88</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="ACM"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory</swrc:title><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>collaborative folksonomy information social tagging theory </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Given the rise in popularity of social tagging systems, it seems only natural to ask how efficient is the organically evolved tagging vocabulary in describing underlying document objects? Does this distributed process really provide a way to circumnavigate the traditional &#034;vocabulary problem&#034; with ontology? We analyze a social tagging site, namely del.icio.us, with information theory in order to evaluate the efficiency of this social tagging site for encoding navigation paths to information sources. We show that information theory provides a natural and interesting way to understand this efficiency - or the descriptive, encoding power of tags. Our results indicate the efficiency of tags appears to be waning. We discuss the implications of our findings and provide insight into how our methods can be used to design more usable social tagging software.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1379110" swrc:key="acmid"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Pittsburgh, PA, USA" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-59593-985-2" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="8" swrc:key="numpages"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1145/1379092.1379110" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ed H. Chi"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Todd Mytkowicz"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/23a2c3898216376eab27848a7f147ee51/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/23a2c3898216376eab27848a7f147ee51/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1571941.1571977"/><swrc:date>Mon Aug 22 10:33:43 CEST 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>195--202</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="ACM"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:series>SIGIR &#039;09</swrc:series><swrc:title>On social networks and collaborative recommendation</swrc:title><swrc:year>2009</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>collaborative folksonomy random recommender tagging walk </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Social network systems, like last.fm, play a significant role in Web 2.0, containing large amounts of multimedia-enriched data that are enhanced both by explicit user-provided annotations and implicit aggregated feedback describing the personal preferences of each user. It is also a common tendency for these systems to encourage the creation of virtual networks among their users by allowing them to establish bonds of friendship and thus provide a novel and direct medium for the exchange of data.

We investigate the role of these additional relationships in developing a track recommendation system. Taking into account both the social annotation and friendships inherent in the social graph established among users, items and tags, we created a collaborative recommendation system that effectively adapts to the personal information needs of each user. We adopt the generic framework of Random Walk with Restarts in order to provide with a more natural and efficient way to represent social networks.

In this work we collected a representative enough portion of the music social network last.fm, capturing explicitly expressed bonds of friendship of the user as well as social tags. We performed a series of comparison experiments between the Random Walk with Restarts model and a user-based collaborative filtering method using the Pearson Correlation similarity. The results show that the graph model system benefits from the additional information embedded in social knowledge. In addition, the graph model outperforms the standard collaborative filtering method.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Boston, MA, USA" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1571977" swrc:key="acmid"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-60558-483-6" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="8" swrc:key="numpages"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1145/1571941.1571977" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ioannis Konstas"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Vassilios Stathopoulos"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Joemon M. Jose"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29d4746291e69e3dbe5fdd1a3e38417f1/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/29d4746291e69e3dbe5fdd1a3e38417f1/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november06/peterson/11peterson.html"/><swrc:date>Thu Jul 21 15:38:25 CEST 2011</swrc:date><swrc:journal>D-Lib Magazine</swrc:journal><swrc:month>nov</swrc:month><swrc:number>11</swrc:number><swrc:title>Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy </swrc:title><swrc:volume>12</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>folksonomy metadata philosophy </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1082-9873" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1045/november2006-peterson" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Elaine Peterson"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fe43da7e093f06c36010358724d03b7b/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2fe43da7e093f06c36010358724d03b7b/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><swrc:date>Mon Jul 04 11:57:00 CEST 2011</swrc:date><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of BCS IRSG Symposium: Future Directions in Information Access 2007</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>aug</swrc:month><swrc:title>Personalization of Social Media</swrc:title><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>collaborative folksonomy media personalization recommender social tagging </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>This article describes a framework that captures collaborative tagging systems, and derives from it an overview of user tasks that qualify for personalization in such a system. Major research areas have focused on some of these tasks, but we identify many more opportunities. We propose a collaborative model that combines collaborative filtering and information retrieval techniques in order to assists the user to achieve these tasks. Based only on the user&#039;s tags, this personalization model assumes that a user&#039;s tags identify this user&#039;s taste. Because many users do not only tag the content that matches their taste, we propose an evaluating experiment that shows if rating information can be used to adjust the users&#039; taste profiles. This experiment is one of the steps to advance to a completely personalized model, integrating user preference, content annotations and people relations.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Glasgow, UK" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="M. Clements"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20dad64a7e8e7fbfe51a4fc22ee533a1a/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/20dad64a7e8e7fbfe51a4fc22ee533a1a/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1864708.1864741"/><swrc:date>Mon May 09 11:44:55 CEST 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>167--174</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="ACM"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:series>RecSys &#039;10</swrc:series><swrc:title>Learning in efficient tag recommendation</swrc:title><swrc:year>2010</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2010 collaborative folksonomy recommender tagging </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>The objective of a tag recommendation system is to propose a set of tags for a resource to ease the tagging process done manually by a user. Tag recommendation is an interesting and well defined research problem. However, while solving it, it is easy to forget about its practical implications. We discuss the practical aspects of tag recommendation and propose a system that successfully addresses the problem of learning in tag recommendation, without sacrificing efficiency. Learning is realized in two aspects: adaptation to newly added posts and parameter tuning. The content of each added post is used to update the resource and user profiles as well as associations between tags. Parameter tuning allows the system to automatically adjust the way tag sources (e.g., content related tags or user profile tags) are combined to match the characteristics of a specific collaborative tagging system. The evaluation on data from three collaborative tagging systems confirmed the importance of both learning methods. Finally, an architecture based on text indexing makes the system efficient enough to serve in real time collaborative tagging systems with number of posts counted in millions, given limited computing resources.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Barcelona, Spain" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1864741" swrc:key="acmid"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-60558-906-0" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="8" swrc:key="numpages"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1145/1864708.1864741" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Marek Lipczak"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Evangelos Milios"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29db90c2ff04f514ada9f6b50fde46065/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/29db90c2ff04f514ada9f6b50fde46065/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Book"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.aka-verlag.com/de/detail?ean=978-3-89838-332-5"/><swrc:date>Thu Jan 27 15:14:23 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>Heidelberg, Germany</swrc:address><swrc:month>jan</swrc:month><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft AKA"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:series>Dissertationen zur Künstlichen Intelligenz</swrc:series><swrc:title>Formal Concept Analysis and Tag Recommendations in Collaborative Tagging Systems</swrc:title><swrc:volume>332</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2011</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2011 analysis collaborative concept fca folksonomy formal myown recommender tag tagging </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>One of the most noticeable innovation that emerged with the advent of the Web 2.0 and the focal point of this thesis are collaborative tagging systems. They allow users to annotate arbitrary resources with freely chosen keywords, so called tags. The tags are used for navigation, finding resources, and serendipitous browsing and thus provide an immediate benefit for the user. By now, several systems for tagging photos, web links, publication references, videos, etc. have attracted millions of users which in turn annotated countless resources. Tagging gained so much popularity that it spread into other applications like web browsers, software packet managers, and even file systems. Therefore, the relevance of the methods presented in this thesis goes beyond the Web 2.0.
The conceptual structure underlying collaborative tagging systems is called folksonomy. It can be represented as a tripartite hypergraph with user, tag, and resource nodes. Each edge of the graph expresses the fact that a user annotated a resource with a tag. This social network constitutes a lightweight conceptual structure that is not formalized, but rather implicit and thus needs to be extracted with knowledge discovery methods. In this thesis a new data mining task – the mining of all frequent tri-concepts – is presented, together with an efficient algorithm for discovering such implicit shared conceptualizations. Our approach extends the data mining task of discovering all closed itemsets to three-dimensional data structures to allow for mining folksonomies. Extending the theory of triadic Formal Concept Analysis, we provide a formal definition of the problem, and present an efficient algorithm for its solution. We show the applicability of our approach on three large real-world examples and thereby perform a conceptual clustering of two collaborative tagging systems. Finally, we introduce neighborhoods of triadic concepts as basis for a lightweight visualization of tri-lattices.
The social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind, has been developed by our research group. Besides being a useful tool for many scientists, it provides interested researchers a basis for the evaluation and integration of their knowledge discovery methods. This thesis introduces BibSonomy as an exemplary collaborative tagging system and gives an overview of its architecture and some of its features. Furthermore, BibSonomy is used as foundation for evaluating and integrating some of the discussed approaches.
Collaborative tagging systems usually include tag recommendation mechanisms easing the process of finding good tags for a resource, but also consolidating the tag vocabulary across users. In this thesis we evaluate and compare several recommendation algorithms on large-scale real-world datasets: an adaptation of user-based Collaborative Filtering, a graph-based recommender built on top of the FolkRank algorithm, and simple methods based on counting tag co-occurences. We show that both FolkRank and Collaborative Filtering provide better results than non-personalized baseline methods. Moreover, since methods based on counting tag co-occurrences are computationally cheap, and thus usually preferable for real time scenarios, we discuss simple approaches for improving the performance of such methods. We demonstrate how a simple recommender based on counting tags from users and resources can perform almost as good as the best recommender. Furthermore, we show how to integrate recommendation methods into a real tagging system, record and evaluate their performance by describing the tag recommendation framework we developed for BibSonomy. With the intention to develop, test, and evaluate recommendation algorithms and supporting cooperation with researchers, we designed the framework to be easily extensible, open for a variety of methods, and usable independent from BibSonomy. We also present an evaluation of the framework which demonstrates its power.
The folksonomy graph shows specific structural properties that explain its growth and the possibility of serendipitous exploration. Clicklogs of web search engines can be represented as a folksonomy in which queries are descriptions of clicked URLs. The resulting network structure, which we will term logsonomy is very similar to the one of folksonomies. In order to find out about its properties, we analyze the topological characteristics of the tripartite hypergraph of queries, users and bookmarks on a large folksonomy snapshot and on query logs of two large search engines. We find that all of the three datasets exhibit similar structural properties and thus conclude that the clicking behaviour of search engine users based on the displayed search results and the tagging behaviour of collaborative tagging users is driven by similar dynamics. 
In this thesis we further transfer the folksonomy paradigm to the Social Semantic Desktop – a new model of computer desktop that uses Semantic Web technologies to better link information items. There we apply community support methods to the folksonomy found in the network of social semantic desktops. Thus, we connect knowledge discovery for folksonomies with semantic technologies.
Alltogether, the research in this thesis is centered around collaborative tagging systems and their underlying datastructure – folksonomies – and thereby paves the way for the further dissemination of this successful knowledge management paradigm.

</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-3-89838-332-5" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="413" swrc:key="vgwort"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Robert Jäschke"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f15cc7613101babb2c3ed1927e35213a/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2f15cc7613101babb2c3ed1927e35213a/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/cattuto2007network.pdf"/><swrc:date>Thu Jan 27 13:37:04 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>Amsterdam, The Netherlands</swrc:address><swrc:journal>AI Communications</swrc:journal><swrc:month>dec</swrc:month><swrc:number>4</swrc:number><swrc:pages>245--262</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="IOS Press"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Network Properties of Folksonomies</swrc:title><swrc:volume>20</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>folksonomy ol_tut2010 property sna analysis network social </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Social resource sharing systems like YouTube and del.icio.us have acquired a large number of users within the last few years. They provide rich resources for data analysis, information retrieval, and knowledge discovery applications. A first step towards this end is to gain better insights into content and structure of these systems. In this paper, we will analyse the main network characteristics of two of these systems. We consider their underlying data structures - so-called folksonomies - as tri-partite hypergraphs, and adapt classical network measures like characteristic path length and clustering coefficient to them.

Subsequently, we introduce a network of tag co-occurrence and investigate some of its statistical properties, focusing on correlations in node connectivity and pointing out features that reflect emergent semantics within the folksonomy. We show that simple statistical indicators unambiguously spot non-social behavior such as spam.
</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="0921-7126" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Ciro Cattuto"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christoph Schmitz"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Andrea Baldassarri"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Vito D. P. Servedio"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Vittorio Loreto"/></rdf:_5><rdf:_6><swrc:Person swrc:name="Andreas Hotho"/></rdf:_6><rdf:_7><swrc:Person swrc:name="Miranda Grahl"/></rdf:_7><rdf:_8><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Stumme"/></rdf:_8></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/218e8babe208fae2c0342438617b0ec31/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/218e8babe208fae2c0342438617b0ec31/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/jaeschke2008discovering.pdf"/><swrc:date>Thu Jan 27 11:59:50 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Semantic Web and Web 2.0</swrc:booktitle><swrc:journal>Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web</swrc:journal><swrc:month>feb</swrc:month><swrc:number>1</swrc:number><swrc:pages>38--53</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Elsevier"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Discovering Shared Conceptualizations in Folksonomies</swrc:title><swrc:volume>6</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2008 analysis concept fca folksonomy formal l3s myown ol_tut2010 tagging top trias </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Social bookmarking tools are rapidly emerging on the Web. In such systems users are setting up lightweight conceptual structures called folksonomies. Unlike ontologies, shared conceptualizations are not formalized, but rather implicit. We present a new data mining task, the mining of all frequent tri-concepts, together with an efficient algorithm, for discovering these implicit shared conceptualizations. Our approach extends the data mining task of discovering all closed itemsets to three-dimensional data structures to allow for mining folksonomies. We provide a formal definition of the problem, and present an efficient algorithm for its solution. Finally, we show the applicability of our approach on three large real-world examples.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1570-8268" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="59" swrc:key="vgwort"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.004" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Robert Jäschke"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Andreas Hotho"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christoph Schmitz"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Bernhard Ganter"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Stumme"/></rdf:_5></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="T. Finin"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="R. Mizoguchi"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="S. Staab"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22cbd8e3236adea7c54779605a5aa4fd6/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/22cbd8e3236adea7c54779605a5aa4fd6/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/hotho06bibsonomy.pdf"/><swrc:date>Thu Jan 27 10:01:57 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>Aalborg, Denmark</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>Proceedings of the Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop at the 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>jul</swrc:month><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Aalborg University Press"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>{BibSonomy}: A Social Bookmark and Publication Sharing System</swrc:title><swrc:year>2006</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2006 bibsonomy bookmarking folksonomy iccs iccs_example l3s myown social trias_example </swrc:keywords><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="87-7307-769-0" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="27" swrc:key="vgwort"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Andreas Hotho"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Robert Jäschke"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christoph Schmitz"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Stumme"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author><swrc:editor><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Aldo de Moor"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Simon Polovina"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Harry Delugach"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:editor></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c9437d5ec56ba949f533aeec00f571e3/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2c9437d5ec56ba949f533aeec00f571e3/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/pub/pdf/benz2010social.pdf"/><swrc:date>Thu Jan 27 09:09:53 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:address>Berlin / Heidelberg</swrc:address><swrc:journal>The VLDB Journal</swrc:journal><swrc:month>dec</swrc:month><swrc:number>6</swrc:number><swrc:pages>849--875</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Springer"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>The Social Bookmark and Publication Management System BibSonomy</swrc:title><swrc:volume>19</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2010</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>2010 bibsonomy bookmark collaborative folksonomy kde management myown publication system tagging top vldb </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Social resource sharing systems are central elements of the Web 2.0 and use the same kind of lightweight knowledge representation, called folksonomy. Their large user communities and ever-growing networks of user-generated content have made them an attractive object of investigation for researchers from different disciplines like Social Network Analysis, Data Mining, Information Retrieval or Knowledge Discovery. In this paper, we summarize and extend our work on different aspects of this branch of Web 2.0 research, demonstrated and evaluated within our own social bookmark and publication sharing system BibSonomy, which is currently among the three most popular systems of its kind. We structure this presentation along the different interaction phases of a user with our system, coupling the relevant research questions of each phase with the corresponding implementation issues. This approach reveals in a systematic fashion important aspects and results of the broad bandwidth of folksonomy research like capturing of emergent semantics, spam detection, ranking algorithms, analogies to search engine log data, personalized tag recommendations and information extraction techniques. We conclude that when integrating a real-life application like BibSonomy into research, certain constraints have to be considered; but in general, the tight interplay between our scientific work and the running system has made BibSonomy a valuable platform for demonstrating and evaluating Web 2.0 research.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1066-8888" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Andreas" swrc:key="for"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Dominik Benz"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Andreas Hotho"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Robert Jäschke"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Beate Krause"/></rdf:_4><rdf:_5><swrc:Person swrc:name="Folke Mitzlaff"/></rdf:_5><rdf:_6><swrc:Person swrc:name="Christoph Schmitz"/></rdf:_6><rdf:_7><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Stumme"/></rdf:_7></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a25702677dc406b1be7878215277050c/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2a25702677dc406b1be7878215277050c/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#PhDThesis"/><swrc:date>Wed Jan 26 12:03:05 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:school><swrc:University swrc:name="Universität Düsseldorf"/></swrc:school><swrc:title>Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval</swrc:title><swrc:type>PhD thesis</swrc:type><swrc:year>2009</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>folksonomy information knowledge representation retrieval wissen </swrc:keywords><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Isabella Peters"/></rdf:_1></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/216fa5c5fc155e296ff885bf62d1a1230/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/216fa5c5fc155e296ff885bf62d1a1230/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/infowiss/mitarbeiter/wissenschaftliche-mitarbeiter-hilfskraefte/isabella-peters/012-folksonomies-in-wissensrepraesentation-und-information-retrieval/"/><swrc:date>Wed Jan 26 11:41:50 CET 2011</swrc:date><swrc:journal>Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis</swrc:journal><swrc:number>2</swrc:number><swrc:pages>77--90</swrc:pages><swrc:title>Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval</swrc:title><swrc:volume>59</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2008</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>folksonomy information representation retrieval wissen </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval.
Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern – Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten – nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente („more like this!“) erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities („more like me!“).

Folksonomies in Knowledge Representation and Information Retrieval
In Web 2.0 services “prosumers” – producers and consumers – collaborate not only for the purpose of creating content, but to index these pieces of information as well. Folksonomies permit actors to describe documents with subject headings, “tags“, without regarding any rules. Apart from a lot of benefits folksonomies have many shortcomings (e.g., lack of precision). In order to solve some of the problems we propose interpreting tags as natural language terms. Accordingly, we can introduce methods of NLP to solve the tags’ linguistic problems. Additionally, we present criteria for tagged documents to create a ranking by relevance (tag distribution, collaboration and actor-based aspects). Besides recommending similar documents („more like this!“) folksonomies can be used for the recommendation of similar users and communities („more like me!“).</swrc:abstract><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Isabella Peters"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Wolfgang G. Stock"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2d5b71572c7fea6504a0c0a3d84a9ecf0/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2d5b71572c7fea6504a0c0a3d84a9ecf0/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5478494"/><swrc:date>Wed Dec 15 17:49:15 CET 2010</swrc:date><swrc:booktitle>2010 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS)</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>may</swrc:month><swrc:pages>349--356</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="IEEE"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>SWE-FE: Extending folksonomies to the Sensor Web</swrc:title><swrc:year>2010</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>collaborative folksonomy sensor tagging toread web </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>This paper presents SWE-FE: a suite of methods to extend folksonomies to the worldwide Sensor Web in order to tackle the emergent data rich information poor (DRIP) syndrome afflicting most geospatial applications on the Internet. SWE-FE leverages the geospatial information associated with three key components of such collaborative tagging systems: tags, resources and users. Specifically, SWE-FE provides algorithms for: i) suggesting tags for users during the tag input stage; ii) generating tag maps which provides for serendipitous browsing; and iii) personalized searching within the folksonomy. We implement SWE-FE on the GeoCENS Sensor Web platform as a case study for assessing the efficacy of our methods. We outline the evaluation framework that we are currently employing to carry out this assessment.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1109/CTS.2010.5478494" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="R. Rezel"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="S. Liang"/></rdf:_2></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ec3c256e7d1f24cd9d407d3ce7e41d96/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2ec3c256e7d1f24cd9d407d3ce7e41d96/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#Article"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11280-009-0069-1"/><swrc:date>Thu Sep 16 19:52:06 CEST 2010</swrc:date><swrc:journal>World Wide Web</swrc:journal><swrc:number>4</swrc:number><swrc:pages>421--440</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="Springer Netherlands"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>The Effectiveness of Latent Semantic Analysis for Building Up a Bottom-up Taxonomy from Folksonomy Tags.</swrc:title><swrc:volume>12</swrc:volume><swrc:year>2009</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>folksonomy lsa ontology tagging taxonomy </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of a semantic smoothing technique to organize folksonomy tags. Folksonomy tags have no explicit relations and vary because they form uncontrolled vocabulary. We discriminates so-called subjective tags like “cool” and “fun” from folksonomy tags without any extra knowledge other than folksonomy triples and use the level of tag generalization to form the objective tags into a hierarchy. We verify that entropy of folksonomy tags is an effective measure for discriminating subjective folksonomy tags. Our hierarchical tag allocation method guarantees the number of children nodes and increases the number of available paths to a target node compared to an existing tree allocation method for folksonomy tags.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="1386-145X" swrc:key="issn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1007/s11280-009-0069-1" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Takeharu Eda"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Masatoshi Yoshikawa"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Toshio Uchiyama"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Tadasu Uchiyama"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2aea6ea6f248a233c9609a93a2e1ee7fa/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/2aea6ea6f248a233c9609a93a2e1ee7fa/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://sole.dimi.uniud.it/~antonina.dattolo/papers/2010/conference/dattolo-hsi2010.pdf"/><swrc:date>Thu Sep 09 14:44:25 CEST 2010</swrc:date><swrc:booktitle>Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Human System Interaction - HSI&#039;2010</swrc:booktitle><swrc:month>may</swrc:month><swrc:pages>548--555</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="IEEE Press"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>The role of tags for recommendation: a survey.</swrc:title><swrc:year>2010</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>folksonomy recommender survey tagging </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Social tagging is an innovative and powerful mechanism introduced with Web 2.0: it shifts the task of classifying resources from a reduced set of knowledge engineers to the wide set of Web users. Users of social tagging systems define personal classifications which can be used by other peers for browsing available resources. However, due to the absence of rules for managing the tagging process, and to the lack of predefined schemas or structures for inserting metadata and relationships among tags, current user generated classifications dop not produce sound taxonomies. This is a strong limitation which prevents an effective and informed resource sharing. For this reason researchers are modeling innovative recommender systems capable to better support tagging, browsing, and searching for new resources. This paper is a survey which discusses the role of tags in recommender systems: starting from social tagging systems, we analyze various techniques for suggesting content and we introduce the approaches exploited for proposing tags for classifying resources, considering both personalized and not-personalized recommendation.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1109/HSI.2010.5514515" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="A. Dattolo"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="F. Ferrara"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="C. Tasso"/></rdf:_3></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29e3f8071d757c492055744cf03ff4a55/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/29e3f8071d757c492055744cf03ff4a55/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1255175.1255198"/><swrc:date>Thu Aug 12 16:38:52 CEST 2010</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>JCDL &#039;07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>107--116</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="ACM"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web?</swrc:title><swrc:year>2007</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>collaborative folksonomy search sentiment tagging web </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>Social bookmarking is an emerging type of a Web service that helps users share, classify, and discover interesting resources. In this paper, we explore the concept of an enhanced search, in which data from social bookmarking systems is exploited for enhancing search in the Web. We propose combining the widely used link-based ranking metric with the one derived using social bookmarking data. First, this increases the precision of a standard link-based search by incorporating popularity estimates from aggregated data of bookmarking users. Second, it provides an opportunity for extending the search capabilities of existing search engines. Individual contributions of bookmarking users as well as the general statistics of their activities are used here for a new kind of a complex search where contextual, temporal or sentiment-related information is used. We investigate the usefulness of social bookmarking systems for the purpose of enhancing Web search through a series of experiments done on datasets obtained from social bookmarking systems. Next, we show the prototype system that implements the proposed approach and we present some preliminary results.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Vancouver, BC, Canada" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-59593-644-8" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1145/1255175.1255198" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Yusuke Yanbe"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Adam Jatowt"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Satoshi Nakamura"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Katsumi Tanaka"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/26628bf43e3834ba147a22992f2f534e9/jaeschke"><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://www.bibsonomy.org/uri/bibtex/26628bf43e3834ba147a22992f2f534e9/jaeschke"/><rdf:type rdf:resource="http://swrc.ontoware.org/ontology#InProceedings"/><owl:sameAs rdf:resource="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1810617.1810664"/><swrc:date>Thu Aug 12 15:01:57 CEST 2010</swrc:date><swrc:address>New York, NY, USA</swrc:address><swrc:booktitle>HT &#039;10: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia</swrc:booktitle><swrc:pages>265--270</swrc:pages><swrc:publisher><swrc:Organization swrc:name="ACM"/></swrc:publisher><swrc:title>Visit me, click me, be my friend: an analysis of evidence networks of user relationships in BibSonomy</swrc:title><swrc:year>2010</swrc:year><swrc:keywords>bibsonomy collaborative community detection evidence folksonomy network tagging </swrc:keywords><swrc:abstract>The ongoing spread of online social networking and sharing sites has reshaped the way how people interact with each other. Analyzing the relatedness of different users within the resulting large populations of these systems plays an important role for tasks like user recommendation or community detection. Algorithms in these fields typically face the problem that explicit user relationships (like friend lists) are often very sparse. Surprisingly, implicit evidences (like click logs) of user relations have hardly been considered to this end. Based on our long-time experience with running BibSonomy [4], we identify in this paper different evidence networks of user relationships in our system. We broadly classify each network based on whether the links are explicitly established by the users (e.g., friendship or group membership) or accrue implicitly in the running system (e.g., when user u copies an entry of user v). We systematically analyze structural properties of these networks and whether topological closeness (in terms of the length of shortest paths) coincides with semantic similarity between users.</swrc:abstract><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="Toronto, Ontario, Canada" swrc:key="location"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="978-1-4503-0041-4" swrc:key="isbn"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:Field swrc:value="10.1145/1810617.1810664" swrc:key="doi"/></swrc:hasExtraField><swrc:author><rdf:Seq><rdf:_1><swrc:Person swrc:name="Folke Mitzlaff"/></rdf:_1><rdf:_2><swrc:Person swrc:name="Dominik Benz"/></rdf:_2><rdf:_3><swrc:Person swrc:name="Gerd Stumme"/></rdf:_3><rdf:_4><swrc:Person swrc:name="Andreas Hotho"/></rdf:_4></rdf:Seq></swrc:author></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
