BibSonomy :: tag  ::

order by ( date | folkrank )

bookmarks

publications

(7)   

• Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration
  S. V. Scott and E. L. Wagner Information and Organization13(4):285-313(2003/10)
  to time; Interpretivist planning; implementation; Organizational IS change; resource of theory; Narrative; Negotiation; Enterprise Sociology perspective; Actor-network Academic administration by jomiralb on Aug 31, 2008, 6:03 PM
  BibTeX 
• Conjoint and extended neural networks for the computation of speech codes: the neural basis of selective impairment in reading words and pseudowords.
  B. Xu and J. Grafman and W. D. Gaillard and K. Ishii and F. Vega-Bermudez and P. Pietrini and P. Reeves-Tyer and P. DiCamillo and W. Theodore Cerebral Cortex(2001)
  to Reaction Cortex; Humans; of Prefrontal Tomography, U.S. Brain Net; Lobe; Analysis Mapping; Research Male; Occipital Temporal Reading; Variance; Emission-Computed Adult; Stimulation; Gov't, Phonetics; P.H.S.; Nerve Photic Female; Cerebellum; Time; Support, by perceptron on Dec 16, 2007, 8:00 PM
  BibTeX 
• Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system.
  M. van Turennout and T. Ellmore and A. Martin Nature Neuroscience(2000)
  to Cerebral Imaging; Pattern Magnetic Occipital Psychomotor Plasticity; Neuronal Lobe; Recognition, Neuropsychological Verbal Visual; Cortex; Neurons; Reaction Performance; Resonance Temporal Tests; Frontal Behavior Time; Humans; by perceptron on Dec 16, 2007, 8:00 PM
  URL | BibTeX 
• A cultural effect on brain function.
  E. Paulesu and E. McCrory and F. Fazio and L. Menoncello and N. Brunswick and S. F. Cappa and M. Cotelli and G. Cossu and F. Corte and M. Lorusso and S. Pesenti and A. Gallagher and D. Perani and C. Price and C. D. Frith and U. Frith Nature Neuroscience(2000)
  to Temporal Reading; Gov't; Photic Humans; Tomography, Non-U.S. Stimulation; Speech; Time; Frontal Mapping; Lobe; Research Italy; Reaction England; Support, Adult; Linguistics; Emission-Computed Brain Culture; by perceptron on Dec 16, 2007, 8:00 PM
  URL | BibTeX 
• Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances.
  Anthony Randal McIntosh and Nancy J Lobaugh Neuroimage(2004)
  to Imaging; Female; Magnetic Male; Humans; Magnetoencephalography; Evoked Algorithms; Results Reaction Image Processing, Positron-Emission Variance; Resonance Potentials; Computer-Assisted; Reproducibility Adult; Tomography; Time; Analysis of Least-Squares Analysis; Electroencephalography; by perceptron on Dec 16, 2007, 8:00 PM
  URL | BibTeX 
• The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus.
  Stanislas Dehaene and Gurvan Le Clec'H and Jean-Baptiste Poline and Denis Le Bihan and Laurent Cohen Neuroreport(2002)
  to Reading; Male; Perception Speech Non-U.S. Gov't; Image Time; Processing, Cortex; Imaging; Reaction Cerebral Computer-Assisted; Resonance Support, Research Humans; Magnetic Adult; Female; by perceptron on Dec 16, 2007, 8:00 PM
  BibTeX 
• Predicting the Relative Efficacy of Verbal, Pictorial, and Tangible Stimuli for Assessing Preferences of Leisure Activities
  Cecile de Vries and C. T. Yu and Gina Sakko and Kirsten M. Wirth and Kerri L. Walters and Carole Marion and Garry L. Martin American Journal on Mental Retardation110(2):145-154Mar 20052005. MT: Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; Male; Female; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); MD: Empirical-Study; Quantit...MT: Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; Male; Female; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); MD: Empirical-Study; Quantitative-Study; TM: Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test; CRN: Number of References: 16; Displayed: 16.; REF: Cohen-Almeida, D., Graff, R. B., & Ahearn, W. H. (2000). A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 329-334. Conyers, C., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002). Predicting the relative efficiency of the three presentation methods for assessing performances of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 49-58. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533. Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. S., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comprehension of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498. Higbee, T. S., Carr, J. E., & Harrison, C. D. (1999). The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 63-72. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(98)00032-8 Higbee, T. S., Carr, J. E., & Harrison, C. D. (2000). Further evaluation of the multiple-stimulus preference assessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 61-73. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(99)00030-X Hughes, C., Pitkin, S. E., & Lorden, S. W. (1998). Assessing preferences and choices of persons with severe and profound mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 299-316. Logan, K. R., & Gast, D. L. (2001). Conducting preference assessments and reinforcer testing for individuals with profound multiple disabilities: Issues and procedures. Exceptionality, 9, 123-134. Lohrmann-O'Rourke, S., & Browder, D. M. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 146-161. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)1032.0.CO;2 Marion, C., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Martin, G. L., Yu, C. T., Sakko, G., & Walters, K. (2003). The hierarchical relationship between several visual and auditory discriminations and three verbal operants among individuals with developmental disabilities. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 91-105. Martin, G. L., & Pear, P. (2003). Behaviour modification: What it is and how to do it (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Martin, G. L., & Yu, C. T. (2000). Overview of research on the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test [Special Issue]. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7(2), 10-36. Northup, J., George, T., Jones, K., Broussard, C., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 201-212. Richards, D. F., Williams, W. L., & Follette, W. C. (2002). Two new empirically derived reasons to use the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 329-339. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2002)1072.0.CO;2 Schwartzman, L., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2003). Choice responding as a function of choice presentation method and level of preference in persons with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Community, and Rehabilitation, 1(3), Article 3. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL01_03_CAN/articles/schwartzman.shtml Windsor, J., Piche, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455. .
  to preference Time; choice behavior modalities; skills; Pictorial assessment stimulus Stimuli; disability Stimuli leisure Stimulus Verbal Tactual activities; developmental discrimination Stimulation; by quinn and 1 other person on Oct 27, 2006, 9:53 PM
  URL | BibTeX