- Dias, G. & Alves, E. (2005). Language-Independent Informative Topic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Social Communication. Santiago de Cuba, Cuba, January 24-28. pp. 588-592. ISBN: 9597174057. [pdf]
What is Semantic Similarity? Definition of Semantic Similarity: A concept whereby a set of documents or terms within term lists are assigned a metric based on the likeness of their meaning/semantic content. ( Wikipedia, 2012e ).
What is Semantic Similarity? Definition of Semantic Similarity: A concept whereby a set of documents or terms within term lists are assigned a metric based on the likeness of their meaning/semantic content. ( Wikipedia, 2012e ).
Semantic similarity and relatedness measures assess how alike two words are within a language and are playing an important role in the development of the Semantic Web. This thesis research advances the knowledge of existing similarity and relatedness measures. A generalized tool to experiment with semantic similarity and relatedness measures in a variety of ontological terminologies has been developed using the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS), a proposed W3C standard for the Semantic Web. SKOS represents a terminology or domain vocabulary in a machine-understandable way. A flexible conversion tool is used to convert any vocabulary in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus and OWL ontologies into an extended SKOS ontological terminology. The generalized tool for measuring semantic similarity and relatedness is then used to analyze a wide variety of semantic similarity measures and new set-based relatedness measures on three major vocabularies of the UMLS Metathesaurus.
TRITE is a pre-computed set of Medline similarity hits on topics of interest to medical researchers. TRITE uses the eTBLAST engine, operating on an edited set of topics selected from the Encyclopidia of Molecular Biology, Blackwell Science, Limited. The q
A. Abdulameer, H. M., S. Alrazak, and S. Lu. IJIRIS:: International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security, Volume V (Issue VIII):
475-485(October 2018)1. Chalom, Edmond, Eran Asa, and Elior Biton. "Measuring image similarity: an overview of some useful applications." IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 16.1 (2013): 24-28. 2. Chandler, Damon M. "Seven challenges in image quality assessment: past, present, and future research." ISRN Signal Processing 2013 (2013). 3. Chandler, Damon M., Md Mushfiqul Alam, and Thien D. Phan. "Seven challenges for image quality research." Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XIX. Vol. 9014. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014. 4. Lajevardi, Seyed Mehdi, and Zahir M. Hussain. "Zernike moments for facial expression recognition." rn 2 (2009): 3. 5. Lajevardi, Seyed Mehdi, and Zahir M. Hussain. "Higher order orthogonal moments for invariant facial expression recognition." Digital Signal Processing 20.6 (2010): 1771-1779. 6. Pass, Greg, and Ramin Zabih. "Comparing images using joint histograms." Multimedia systems 7.3 (1999): 234-240. 7. Shnain, Noor Abdalrazak, Zahir M. Hussain, and Song Feng Lu. Ä feature-based structural measure: An image similarity measure for face recognition." Applied Sciences 7.8 (2017): 786. 8. Wang, Zhou, et al. "Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity." IEEE transactions on image processing 13.4 (2004): 600-612. 9. Zhang, Lin, et al. "FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment." IEEE transactions on Image Processing20.8 (2011): 2378-2386. 10. Aljanabi, Mohammed Abdulameer, Zahir M. Hussain, and Song Feng Lu. Än entropy-histogram approach for image similarity and face recognition." Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018 (2018). 11. Aljanabi, Mohammed Abdulameer, Noor Abdalrazak Shnain, and Song Feng Lu. Än image similarity measure based on joint histogram—Entropy for face recognition." Computer and Communications (ICCC), 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2017. 12. Hwang, Sun-Kyoo, and Whoi-Yul Kim. Ä novel approach to the fast computation of Zernike moments." Pattern Recognition 39.11 (2006): 2065-2076. 13. Canny, John. Ä computational approach to edge detection." IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 6 (1986): 679-698. 14. Picard, C. F. "The use of information theory in the study of the diversity of biological populations." Proc. Fifth Berk. Symp. IV. 1979. 15. Ponomarenko, Nikolay, et al. "TID2008-a database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics." Advances of Modern Radioelectronics 10.4 (2009): 30-45. 16. Ninassi, A., P. Le Callet, and F. Autrusseau. "Subjective quality assessment-IVC database." online http://www. irccyn. ec-nantes. fr/ivcdb (2006). 17. “Laboratories, A.T. The Database of Faces,” http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/facedatabase.html 18. “FEI Face Database,” http://fei.edu.br/∼cet/facedatabase.html.
R. Kraft, F. Maghoul, and C. Chang. CIKM '05: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, page 816--823. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press, (2005)
D. Wangsadirdja, F. Heinickel, S. Trapp, A. Zehe, K. Kobs, and A. Hotho. Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2022), page 1235--1243. Seattle, United States, Association for Computational Linguistics, (July 2022)
D. Wangsadirdja, F. Heinickel, S. Trapp, A. Zehe, K. Kobs, and A. Hotho. Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2022), page 1235--1243. Seattle, United States, Association for Computational Linguistics, (July 2022)
D. Wangsadirdja, F. Heinickel, S. Trapp, A. Zehe, K. Kobs, and A. Hotho. Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2022), page 1235--1243. Seattle, United States, Association for Computational Linguistics, (July 2022)
E. Agirre, and G. Rigau. Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '96), August 5-9, 1996, Copenhagen, Denmark, page 16--22. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, (1996)
H. Li, and N. Abe. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2, page 749--755. Association for Computational Linguistics, (1998)
M. Steyvers, R. Shiffrin, and D. Nelson. Experimental Cognitive Psychology and its Applications: Festschrift in Honour of L Bourne, W Kintsch and T Landauer, (2004)
E. Yeh, D. Ramage, C. Manning, E. Agirre, and A. Soroa. Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing, page 41--49. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2009)
M. Strube, and S. Ponzetto. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 21, page 1419. Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London; AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999, (2006)