sign in · help · news · about · deen

BibSonomy ::  user :: cschie ::

The blue social bookmark and publication sharing system.
 

bookmarks

 (5)
<< < 1 > >> 
  • However I don't think this is the key point about agile methods. Lack of documentation is a symptom of two much deeper differences: Agile methods are a...
    However I don't think this is the key point about agile methods. Lack of documentation is a symptom of two much deeper differences: Agile methods are adaptive rather than predictive. Engineering methods tend to try to plan out a large part of the software process in great detail for a long span of time, this works well until things change. So their nature is to resist change. The agile methods, however, welcome change. They try to be processes that adapt and thrive on change, even to the point of changing themselves. Agile methods are people-oriented rather than process-oriented. The goal of engineering methods is to define a process that will work well whoever happens to be using it. Agile methods assert that no process will ever make up the skill of the development team, so the role of a process is to support the development team in their work.In the following sections I'll explore these differences in more detail, so that you can understand what an adaptive and people-centered process is like, its benefits and drawbacks, and whether it's something you should use: either as a developer or customer of software.
    to process software adaptive predictive engineering methodology agility by cschie and 1 other user on Mar 26, 2009, 12:58 PM
    (0)
  • - leave anything related to transport, communication to other layers- use this revised CEP to express and execute event-relevant logic, the purpose of whic...
    - leave anything related to transport, communication to other layers- use this revised CEP to express and execute event-relevant logic, the purpose of which is to translate the ambient events into relevant business events- have these business events trigger business processes (however lightweight you want to make them)- have these business processes invoke decision services implemented through decision management to decide what they should be doing at every step- have the business processes invoke action services to execute the actions decided by the decision services- all the while generating business events or ambient events- etc.
    to CEP architecture complex confusion context decision event process processing rules service situation software state time view by cschie on Mar 5, 2009, 5:07 PM
    (0)
  • - First, event management is primarily about the identification and generation of business events from the ambient events. Similar to what Carole-Ann and I...
    - First, event management is primarily about the identification and generation of business events from the ambient events. Similar to what Carole-Ann and I had written in previous posts.- Second, IBM wants to introduce high level EPLs to express the logic for that processing that are business-centric, something very similar to what Business Rules Languages and approaches are in the business rules management area.
    to IBM business complex event processing rules software tool by cschie on Mar 5, 2009, 3:02 PM
    (0)
  • to BMM IBM Rational business model motivation requirements software by cschie on Feb 20, 2009, 1:14 PM
    (0)
  • to mining process prom software tool by cschie on Feb 18, 2009, 5:42 PM
    (0)
<< < 1 > >>bookmarks per page: 5 10 20 50 100  

publications

 (3)
<< < 1 > >> 
<< < 1 > >>publications per page: 5 10 20 50 100  
a gripper