user- UIST '03: Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, page 193--202. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2003)
- CSCW, page 339-346. (2000)
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, page 120--127. ACM New York, (1999)
- CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, page 286--293. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (1999)
- CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, page 167--174. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
- Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, page 159-178. Kluwer Academic Publishers, (February 2004)
- Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2004)
- Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, page 97-112. Springer, (1991)Setting: Supported Process: Design Process in small teams distributed => Sketching is important for design processses => Group sketching with shared dr...Setting: Supported Process: Design Process in small teams distributed => Sketching is important for design processses => Group sketching with shared drawing tools Fokus: Idea Management in shared drawing tools. Motivation: No own empirical results. Argumentation is based on results of other studies that characterize the design process as chaotic => need for management. Goal: Architecture for idea management in shared drawing tools Methodical Approach: Research Studies on Group Design Activities and Design Methodology => Collect Group Behavior Data => Study and Understand to generate a taxonomy of group idea management processes => Derive user Requiremets for supporting group idea management => Develop architecture CaveDraw Results: - Taxonomy of group idea management processes list of recurring process patterns: * Agree and add on the suggested idea * Agree and subdivide the suggested idea * Modify the suggested idea * Scratch and restart * Agree and wait * Compare and consolidate * Deprivatize design ideas - CaveDraw shared drawing package - Layer-based - All users can work on different layers on the same time. - Pointer to point on items - Definition of five critical factors for idea management argumentation unknown: * Work Allocation: split between individual and group, personal design space? * Design Integration: how can data from the personal space be integrated * Design Ownership: * Design Recall: Undo-possibilites, versioning * Space Sharing: amount of workspace is limited, if a big group acts on the workspace, the space can quickly be full. - User Requirements drawn from taxonomy: - Drawing of user requirements from each of the critical factors perspectives - Argumentation that a layer based-approach satisfies the user requirements..
- Usability Professionals, page 69-71. (2009)
- CHI, 98, page 18-23. (1998)
- iX (2009)
- GI '08: Proceedings of graphics interface 2008, page 243--250. Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada, Canadian Information Processing Society, (2008)
- UIST '01: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, page 219--226. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2001)
- CHI, page 518-525. (2000)
- Wiley, Chichester, (2005)
- Briggs and de Vreede, Nebraska, (2009)
- CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, page 519--526. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
- INTERACT, page 1124-1128. (2005)
- GROUP, page 61-70. (1997)
- CHI, page 1201-1210. (2006)
