@ndbunner

Relations among notions of security for public-key encryption schemes

, , , and . Advances in Cryptology --- CRYPTO '98, page 26--45. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (1998)

Abstract

We compare the relative strengths of popular notions of security for public key encryption schemes. We consider the goals of privacy and non-malleability, each under chosen plaintext attack and two kinds of chosen ciphertext attack. For each of the resulting pairs of definitions we prove either an implication (every scheme meeting one notion must meet the other) or a separation (there is a scheme meeting one notion but not the other, assuming the first notion can be met at all). We similarly treat plaintext awareness, a notion of security in the random oracle model. An additional contribution of this paper is a new definition of non-malleability which we believe is simpler than the previous one.

Description

Relations among notions of security for public-key encryption schemes | SpringerLink

Links and resources

BibTeX key:
10.1007/BFb0055718
search on:

Comments and Reviews  
(0)

There is no review or comment yet. You can write one!

Tags


Cite this publication