Protein–Protein Interactions More Conserved within Species than across Species
PLoS Comput Biol, 2 (7):
e79+ (Jul 21, 2006)DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020079
Abstract
Experimental high-throughput studies of proteinâprotein interactions are beginning to provide enough data for comprehensive computational studies. Today, about ten large data sets, each with thousands of interacting pairs, coarsely sample the interactions in fly, human, worm, and yeast. Another about 55,000 pairs of interacting proteins have been identified by more careful, detailed biochemical experiments. Most interactions are experimentally observed in prokaryotes and simple eukaryotes; very few interactions are observed in higher eukaryotes such as mammals. It is commonly assumed that pathways in mammals can be inferred through homology to model organisms, e.g. the experimental observation that two yeast proteins interact is transferred to infer that the two corresponding proteins in human also interact. Two pairs for which the interaction is conserved are often described as interologs. The goal of this investigation was a large-scale comprehensive analysis of such inferences, i.e. of the evolutionary conservation of interologs. Here, we introduced a novel score for measuring the overlap between proteinâprotein interaction data sets. This measure appeared to reflect the overall quality of the data and was the basis for our two surprising results from our large-scale analysis. Firstly, homology-based inferences of physical proteinâprotein interactions appeared far less successful than expected. In fact, such inferences were accurate only for extremely high levels of sequence similarity. Secondly, and most surprisingly, the identification of interacting partners through sequence similarity was significantly more reliable for protein pairs within the same organism than for pairs between species. Our analysis underlined that the discrepancies between different datasets are large, even when using the same type of experiment on the same organism. This reality considerably constrains the power of homology-based transfer of interactions. In particular, the experimental probing of interactions in distant model organisms has to be undertaken with some caution. More comprehensive images of proteinâprotein networks will require the combination of many high-throughput methods, including in silico inferences and predictions. http://www.rostlab.org/results/2006/ppi\_homology/ The IntAct database contains about ten large-scale data sets of proteinâprotein interactions. Each set contains thousands of experimentally observed pair interactions. Most pairs were observed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), fly (Drosophila melanogaster), and worm (Caenorhabditis elegans). These interactions are often perceived as model organisms in the sense that one can infer that two mouse proteins interact if one experimentally observes the two corresponding proteins in worm to interact. Here, the authors analyzed in detail how the sequence signals of physical proteinâprotein interactions are conserved. It is a common assumption that proteinâprotein interactions can easily be inferred through homology transfer from one model organism to another organism of interest. Here, the authors demonstrated that such homology transfers are only accurate at unexpectedly high levels of sequence identity. Even more surprisingly, homology transfers of proteinâprotein interactions are significantly more reliable for protein pairs from the same species than for two protein pairs from different organisms. The observation that interactions were much more conserved within than across species was valid for all levels of sequence similarity, i.e. for very similar as well as for more diverged interologs.
Links and resources
Tags
community
@karthikraman's tags highlighted