%0 Journal Article %1 Staudt1995 %A Staudt, L. A. %A Nuwer, M. R. %A Peacock, W. J. %D 1995 %J Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol %K Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child, Preschool; Electric Stimulation; Electromyography; Humans; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Muscle Spasticity; Muscles; Prognosis; Rhizotomy %N 6 %P 296--309 %T Intraoperative monitoring during selective posterior rhizotomy: technique and patient outcome. %V 97 %X We evaluated intraoperative electromyographic (EMG) results among 110 pediatric patients with spastic cerebral palsy who underwent selective posterior rhizotomy. We analyzed surgical outcomes for 60 of these patients who returned for follow-up assessment between 4 and 17 months postoperatively. Reduction in muscle tone (resistance to passive movement), increased range of motion and improvements in functional skills were seen at follow-up. To control for possible changes due to development, participation in therapy, or instability of measurements, 30 rhizotomy patients were evaluated twice during a baseline period of several months prior to surgery. No significant changes were found between these two measurement sessions during the baseline control period suggesting that the rhizotomy surgery itself caused the postoperative improvements. These intraoperative EMG monitoring techniques have been adopted at many other centers but variations in specific methods and EMG criteria have developed subsequently among major hospitals where selective posterior rhizotomy is performed. These variations in neurophysiologic methods and recent controversy about the usefulness of such intraoperative EMG monitoring created a need for us to publish our standard EMG selection technique. We describe here, in detail, methods for nerve rootlet testing and selection.

@article{Staudt1995, abstract = {We evaluated intraoperative electromyographic (EMG) results among 110 pediatric patients with spastic cerebral palsy who underwent selective posterior rhizotomy. We analyzed surgical outcomes for 60 of these patients who returned for follow-up assessment between 4 and 17 months postoperatively. Reduction in muscle tone (resistance to passive movement), increased range of motion and improvements in functional skills were seen at follow-up. To control for possible changes due to development, participation in therapy, or instability of measurements, 30 rhizotomy patients were evaluated twice during a baseline period of several months prior to surgery. No significant changes were found between these two measurement sessions during the baseline control period suggesting that the rhizotomy surgery itself caused the postoperative improvements. These intraoperative EMG monitoring techniques have been adopted at many other centers but variations in specific methods and EMG criteria have developed subsequently among major hospitals where selective posterior rhizotomy is performed. These variations in neurophysiologic methods and recent controversy about the usefulness of such intraoperative EMG monitoring created a need for us to publish our standard EMG selection technique. We describe here, in detail, methods for nerve rootlet testing and selection.}, added-at = {2014-07-19T21:23:24.000+0200}, author = {Staudt, L. A. and Nuwer, M. R. and Peacock, W. J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2422da35d4d7ab314dbd271d18e01663c/ar0berts}, groups = {public}, interhash = {a74e8e785ae34506bb750bd512adbc00}, intrahash = {422da35d4d7ab314dbd271d18e01663c}, journal = {Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol}, keywords = {Cerebral Palsy; Child; Child, Preschool; Electric Stimulation; Electromyography; Humans; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Muscle Spasticity; Muscles; Prognosis; Rhizotomy}, month = Dec, number = 6, pages = {296--309}, pmid = {8536579}, timestamp = {2014-07-19T21:23:24.000+0200}, title = {Intraoperative monitoring during selective posterior rhizotomy: technique and patient outcome.}, username = {ar0berts}, volume = 97, year = 1995 }