H. Moed. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication Springer, (2017)
Abstract
This book presents an introduction to the field of applied evaluative informetrics, dealing with the use of bibliometric or informetric indicators in research assessment. It sketches the field's history, recent achievements, and its potential and limits. The book dedicates special attention to the application context of quantitative research assessment. It describes research assessment as an evaluation science, and distinguishes various assessment models, in which the domain of informetrics and the policy sphere are disentangled analytically. It illustrates how external, non-informetric factors influence indicator development, and how the policy context impacts the setup of an assessment process. It also clarifies common misunderstandings in the interpretation of some often used statistics. Addressing the way forward, the book expresses the author's critical views on a series of fundamental problems in the current use of research performance indicators in research assessment. Highligh
%0 Book
%1 moed2017applied
%A Moed, H. F.
%B Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication
%D 2017
%I Springer
%K bibliometrie evaluation
%T Applied Evaluative Informetrics.
%X This book presents an introduction to the field of applied evaluative informetrics, dealing with the use of bibliometric or informetric indicators in research assessment. It sketches the field's history, recent achievements, and its potential and limits. The book dedicates special attention to the application context of quantitative research assessment. It describes research assessment as an evaluation science, and distinguishes various assessment models, in which the domain of informetrics and the policy sphere are disentangled analytically. It illustrates how external, non-informetric factors influence indicator development, and how the policy context impacts the setup of an assessment process. It also clarifies common misunderstandings in the interpretation of some often used statistics. Addressing the way forward, the book expresses the author's critical views on a series of fundamental problems in the current use of research performance indicators in research assessment. Highligh
%@ 9783319605210
@book{moed2017applied,
abstract = {This book presents an introduction to the field of applied evaluative informetrics, dealing with the use of bibliometric or informetric indicators in research assessment. It sketches the field's history, recent achievements, and its potential and limits. The book dedicates special attention to the application context of quantitative research assessment. It describes research assessment as an evaluation science, and distinguishes various assessment models, in which the domain of informetrics and the policy sphere are disentangled analytically. It illustrates how external, non-informetric factors influence indicator development, and how the policy context impacts the setup of an assessment process. It also clarifies common misunderstandings in the interpretation of some often used statistics. Addressing the way forward, the book expresses the author's critical views on a series of fundamental problems in the current use of research performance indicators in research assessment. Highligh},
added-at = {2018-01-11T13:16:59.000+0100},
author = {Moed, H. F.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/244e1f8880e027e98dfe44a70fc3f58a5/wdees},
interhash = {e021d8034503bd77765689cc4537d2d6},
intrahash = {44e1f8880e027e98dfe44a70fc3f58a5},
isbn = {9783319605210},
keywords = {bibliometrie evaluation},
publisher = {Springer},
series = {Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication},
timestamp = {2018-01-11T13:16:59.000+0100},
title = {Applied Evaluative Informetrics.},
year = 2017
}