%0 Conference Paper %1 espinosa99 %A Espinosa, O. %A Hendrickson, C. %A Garrett, J. %B IEEE Symp. InfoVis 99 %D 1999 %K information visualization %P 44--52 %T Domain analysis: a technique to design a user-centered visualization framework

@inproceedings{espinosa99, added-at = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, author = {Espinosa, O. and Hendrickson, C. and Garrett, J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25c2c63e3de78813200d330563a89a0ec/neilernst}, booktitle = {IEEE Symp. InfoVis 99}, citeulike-article-id = {111820}, comment = {-- bunch of engineers(!) idea is that understanding/asking what the users want to see is as important as just conceptualizing the appropriate infovis as a designer typically use the data to drive the viz, this applies domain analysis - reuse old techniques if same problems in different domains domain analysis techniques: expert interviews, lit reviews of domain, user observation, domain based problem-solving domain description template: -entities -relationships (only mathematical or causal?) -assumptions -data sources + user tasks and viz needs question: how do users know all the potential techniques they may want to use? they do not have the expert knowledge ? this is why we should test the techniques on users and then go from there. sample users: researchers vs practitioners (researchers evaluate the model, practitioners implement it) paper does not evaluate the results of this: were users satisfied with the viz? of course, how would they know what could have been?}, description = {sdasda}, interhash = {0572c817a888d5691f82c98018355cb6}, intrahash = {5c2c63e3de78813200d330563a89a0ec}, keywords = {information visualization}, pages = {44--52}, pdf = {user-center-viz-espinosa.pdf}, priority = {0}, timestamp = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, title = {Domain analysis: a technique to design a user-centered visualization framework}, year = 1999 }