A study explores the way people organize information in support of projects ("teach a course", "plan a wedding", etc.). The folder structures to organize project information - especially electronic documents and other files - frequently resembled a "divide and conquer" problem decomposition with subfolders corresponding to major components (subprojects) of the project. Folders were clearly more than simply a means to one end: Organizing for later retrieval. Folders were information in their own right - representing, for example, a person's evolving understanding of a project and its components. Unfortunately, folders are often överloaded" with information. For example, folders sometimes included leading characters to force an ordering (äa", "zz"). And folder hierarchies frequently reflected a tension between organizing information for current use vs. repeated re-use.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 jones2005
%A Jones, W.
%A Phuwanartnurak, A. J.
%A Gill, R.
%A Bruce, H.
%B CHI '05: CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems
%C New York, NY, USA
%D 2005
%I ACM
%K MUSTREAD motivation reading-group tagging
%P 1505--1508
%R http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1056808.1056952
%T Don't take my folders away!: organizing personal information to get things done
%U http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1056952
%X A study explores the way people organize information in support of projects ("teach a course", "plan a wedding", etc.). The folder structures to organize project information - especially electronic documents and other files - frequently resembled a "divide and conquer" problem decomposition with subfolders corresponding to major components (subprojects) of the project. Folders were clearly more than simply a means to one end: Organizing for later retrieval. Folders were information in their own right - representing, for example, a person's evolving understanding of a project and its components. Unfortunately, folders are often överloaded" with information. For example, folders sometimes included leading characters to force an ordering (äa", "zz"). And folder hierarchies frequently reflected a tension between organizing information for current use vs. repeated re-use.
%@ 1-59593-002-7
@inproceedings{jones2005,
abstract = {A study explores the way people organize information in support of projects ("teach a course", "plan a wedding", etc.). The folder structures to organize project information - especially electronic documents and other files - frequently resembled a "divide and conquer" problem decomposition with subfolders corresponding to major components (subprojects) of the project. Folders were clearly more than simply a means to one end: Organizing for later retrieval. Folders were information in their own right - representing, for example, a person's evolving understanding of a project and its components. Unfortunately, folders are often "overloaded" with information. For example, folders sometimes included leading characters to force an ordering ("aa", "zz"). And folder hierarchies frequently reflected a tension between organizing information for current use vs. repeated re-use.},
added-at = {2009-08-10T22:47:50.000+0200},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
author = {Jones, W. and Phuwanartnurak, A. J. and Gill, R. and Bruce, H.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/274c1f6b201a203b7c1f1ec44cf8979e2/mstrohm},
booktitle = {CHI '05: CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems},
description = {Don't take my folders away!},
doi = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1056808.1056952},
interhash = {c780239db9bec9fe3890e8ef76047811},
intrahash = {74c1f6b201a203b7c1f1ec44cf8979e2},
isbn = {1-59593-002-7},
keywords = {MUSTREAD motivation reading-group tagging},
location = {Portland, OR, USA},
pages = {1505--1508},
publisher = {ACM},
timestamp = {2009-08-10T22:47:51.000+0200},
title = {Don't take my folders away!: organizing personal information to get things done},
url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1056952},
year = 2005
}