%0 Journal Article %1 Wehr.2019 %A Wehr, Franka %A Held, Jürgen %D 2019 %J Applied Ergonomics %K Microsurgery Skill;acquisition Stereoscopy myown %P 40-49 %R 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.006 %T Stereoscopic versus monoscopic displays: Learning fine manual dexterity skills using a microsurgical task simulator %V 77 %X We investigated the learning of fine manual dexterity with a microsurgical instrument and a new simulator in a context of microsurgery. 30 subjects were divided into two groups. One (3D group) interacted with a stereoscopic and the other (2D group) with a monoscopic display. Visual information for the displays was captured from a surgical stereomicroscope. In 20 trials, both groups performed the repetitive tasks of picking up small rods from a funnel-shaped cavity and placing them outside. In analysing learning curves, we found that the initial learning process for hand-eye coordination is easier with a 3D display, and that performance persists at a higher level of proficiency than with the 2D display option. Thus stereoscopic displays can be especially beneficial for novices, for those learning new procedures, or for providing orientation to operators facing a new or altered spatial situation. Simulators with few reliefs or spatial textures should not be used for comparison between 3D and 2D viewing conditions.

@article{Wehr.2019, abstract = {We investigated the learning of fine manual dexterity with a microsurgical instrument and a new simulator in a context of microsurgery. 30 subjects were divided into two groups. One (3D group) interacted with a stereoscopic and the other (2D group) with a monoscopic display. Visual information for the displays was captured from a surgical stereomicroscope. In 20 trials, both groups performed the repetitive tasks of picking up small rods from a funnel-shaped cavity and placing them outside. In analysing learning curves, we found that the initial learning process for hand-eye coordination is easier with a 3D display, and that performance persists at a higher level of proficiency than with the 2D display option. Thus stereoscopic displays can be especially beneficial for novices, for those learning new procedures, or for providing orientation to operators facing a new or altered spatial situation. Simulators with few reliefs or spatial textures should not be used for comparison between 3D and 2D viewing conditions.}, added-at = {2022-09-09T09:23:41.000+0200}, author = {Wehr, Franka and Held, Jürgen}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/292ad805d0889ebecc51cae7804a3dc04/frankawehr}, doi = {10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.006}, file = {Wehr{\_}Held{\_}2019{\_}AppliedErgonomics{\_}Stereoscopic versus monoscopic displays{\_}Learning fine manual dexterity skills using a microsurgical task simulator:Attachments/Wehr{\_}Held{\_}2019{\_}AppliedErgonomics{\_}Stereoscopic versus monoscopic displays{\_}Learning fine manual dexterity skills using a microsurgical task simulator.pdf:application/pdf}, interhash = {61ae5d45ecd783188cd863286427a26a}, intrahash = {92ad805d0889ebecc51cae7804a3dc04}, issn = {0003-6870}, journal = {Applied Ergonomics}, keywords = {Microsurgery Skill;acquisition Stereoscopy myown}, pages = {40-49}, timestamp = {2022-09-09T09:25:38.000+0200}, title = {Stereoscopic versus monoscopic displays: Learning fine manual dexterity skills using a microsurgical task simulator}, volume = 77, year = 2019 }