Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences
K. Antelman. Learned Publishing, 19 (2):
85--95(2006)
Abstract
Authors in different disciplines exhibit
very different behaviours on the so-called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors
publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of
the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers’ self-archiving policies have no influence on author self-archiving practice.
%0 Journal Article
%1 citeulike:581009
%A Antelman, K.
%D 2006
%J Learned Publishing
%K researchers_uses self_archiving social_sciences
%N 2
%P 85--95
%T Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences
%U http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006023/
%V 19
%X Authors in different disciplines exhibit
very different behaviours on the so-called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors
publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of
the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers’ self-archiving policies have no influence on author self-archiving practice.
@article{citeulike:581009,
abstract = {Authors in different disciplines exhibit
very different behaviours on the so-called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors
publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of
the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers’ self-archiving policies have no influence on author self-archiving practice.},
added-at = {2007-11-22T18:12:11.000+0100},
author = {Antelman, K.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29917f647447cb35d6d26ebd33389bd2d/jsicot},
citeulike-article-id = {581009},
interhash = {63a8de5f27fa17f99326ef720464f790},
intrahash = {9917f647447cb35d6d26ebd33389bd2d},
journal = {Learned Publishing},
keywords = {researchers_uses self_archiving social_sciences},
number = 2,
pages = {85--95},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2007-11-23T12:17:54.000+0100},
title = {Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences},
url = {http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006023/},
volume = 19,
year = 2006
}