%0 Journal Article %1 tschanter2026matters %A Tschanter, Jonathan %A Merz, Christian %A Fiedler, Marie Luisa %A Wienrich, Carolin %A Latoschik, Marc Erich %D 2026 %J IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics %K c.wienrich ieeevr26 merz mfiedler myown piis tschanter xrhub %T Use Case Matters: Comparing the User Experience and Task Performance Across Tasks for Embodied Interaction in VR %X Integrated Virtual Reality (IVR) systems are central to avatar-mediated use cases in Virtual Reality (VR), reconstructing users' movements on avatars. They differ primarily in their tracking architectures, which determine how completely and accurately users' movements are captured and reconstructed on avatars. Many current IVR systems reduce user-worn hardware, trading reconstruction accuracy against cost and setup complexity, yet their impact on user experience and task performance across use cases remains underexplored. We compared three reduced user-worn IVR systems. Each system has distinct technical approaches: (1) Captury (markerless outside-in optical tracking), (2) Meta Movement SDK (markerless inside-out optical tracking), and (3) Vive Trackers (marker-based outside-in optical tracking with IMUs). In a 3x5 mixed-design, participants performed five tasks, simulating different use cases, to probe distinct aspects of these systems. No system consistently outperformed the others. Meta excelled in hand-based, fast-paced interactions, while Captury and Vive performed better in lower-body tasks and during full-body pose observation. These findings underscore the need to evaluate reduced user-worn IVR systems within the specific use case. We offer practical guidance for system selection based on use-case demands and released our tasks as an open-source, extensible framework to support future evaluations for selecting IVR systems.

@article{tschanter2026matters, abstract = {Integrated Virtual Reality (IVR) systems are central to avatar-mediated use cases in Virtual Reality (VR), reconstructing users' movements on avatars. They differ primarily in their tracking architectures, which determine how completely and accurately users' movements are captured and reconstructed on avatars. Many current IVR systems reduce user-worn hardware, trading reconstruction accuracy against cost and setup complexity, yet their impact on user experience and task performance across use cases remains underexplored. We compared three reduced user-worn IVR systems. Each system has distinct technical approaches: (1) Captury (markerless outside-in optical tracking), (2) Meta Movement SDK (markerless inside-out optical tracking), and (3) Vive Trackers (marker-based outside-in optical tracking with IMUs). In a 3x5 mixed-design, participants performed five tasks, simulating different use cases, to probe distinct aspects of these systems. No system consistently outperformed the others. Meta excelled in hand-based, fast-paced interactions, while Captury and Vive performed better in lower-body tasks and during full-body pose observation. These findings underscore the need to evaluate reduced user-worn IVR systems within the specific use case. We offer practical guidance for system selection based on use-case demands and released our tasks as an open-source, extensible framework to support future evaluations for selecting IVR systems.}, added-at = {2026-02-09T09:40:03.000+0100}, author = {Tschanter, Jonathan and Merz, Christian and Fiedler, Marie Luisa and Wienrich, Carolin and Latoschik, Marc Erich}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a2859bdfae0ebf54f79f42e1ea03ae2c/hci-uwb}, interhash = {4a223553cf4acaaec1a192c7426e43d8}, intrahash = {a2859bdfae0ebf54f79f42e1ea03ae2c}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics}, keywords = {c.wienrich ieeevr26 merz mfiedler myown piis tschanter xrhub}, note = {To be published}, timestamp = {2026-02-09T09:40:03.000+0100}, title = {Use Case Matters: Comparing the User Experience and Task Performance Across Tasks for Embodied Interaction in VR}, year = 2026 }