%0 Generic %1 Wilczek2007 %A Wilczek, Frank %D 2007 %K constants fundamental mass unit %T Fundamental Constants %U http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.4361 %X The notion of ``fundamental constant'' is heavily theory-laden. A natural, fairly precise formulation is possible in the context of the standard model (here defined to include gravity). Some fundamental constants have profound geometric meaning. The ordinary gravitational constant parameterizes the stiffness, or resistance to curvature, of space-time. The cosmological term parameterizes space-time's resistance to expansion -- which may be, and apparently is at present, a negative resistance, i.e. a tendency toward expansion. The three gauge couplings of the strong, electromagnetic, and weak interactions parameterize resistance to curvature in internal spaces. The remaining fundamental couplings, of which there are a few dozen, supply an ungainly accommodation of inertia. The multiplicity and variety of fundamental constants are esthetic and conceptual shortcomings in our present understanding of foundational physics. I discuss some ideas for improving the situation. I then briefly discuss additional constants, primarily cosmological, that enter into our best established present-day world model. Those constants presently appear as macroscopic state parameters, i.e. as empirical ``material constants'' of the Universe. I mention a few ideas for how they might become fundamental constants in a future theory. In the course of this essay I've advertised several of my favorite speculations, including a few that might be tested soon.

@misc{Wilczek2007, abstract = { The notion of ``fundamental constant'' is heavily theory-laden. A natural, fairly precise formulation is possible in the context of the standard model (here defined to include gravity). Some fundamental constants have profound geometric meaning. The ordinary gravitational constant parameterizes the stiffness, or resistance to curvature, of space-time. The cosmological term parameterizes space-time's resistance to expansion -- which may be, and apparently is at present, a {\it negative} resistance, i.e. a tendency toward expansion. The three gauge couplings of the strong, electromagnetic, and weak interactions parameterize resistance to curvature in internal spaces. The remaining fundamental couplings, of which there are a few dozen, supply an ungainly accommodation of inertia. The multiplicity and variety of fundamental constants are esthetic and conceptual shortcomings in our present understanding of foundational physics. I discuss some ideas for improving the situation. I then briefly discuss additional constants, primarily cosmological, that enter into our best established present-day world model. Those constants presently appear as macroscopic state parameters, i.e. as empirical ``material constants'' of the Universe. I mention a few ideas for how they might become fundamental constants in a future theory. In the course of this essay I've advertised several of my favorite speculations, including a few that might be tested soon. }, added-at = {2011-04-22T11:35:21.000+0200}, author = {Wilczek, Frank}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a3d3a12ad4dd9704a6920c82b807493c/syassen}, description = {Fundamental Constants}, interhash = {3a72fb9cc9b4755f5b2774c9c8eecc2f}, intrahash = {a3d3a12ad4dd9704a6920c82b807493c}, keywords = {constants fundamental mass unit}, note = {cite arxiv:0708.4361 Comment: 20 pages, no figures}, timestamp = {2011-04-22T11:35:21.000+0200}, title = {Fundamental Constants}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.4361}, year = 2007 }