We provide a critical review of existing teacher responsibility measures, develop the rationale for, and introduce a new Teacher Responsibility Scale (TRS). Evidence from a sample of German pre-service teachers (Study 1) and American in-service teachers (Study 2) supported a multi-dimensional model of teacher responsibility with four subscales that assess responsibility for student motivation, student achievement, relationships with students, and teaching. The study demonstrated that teacher responsibility is conceptually and empirically distinct from self-efficacy, and that the associations between responsibility and self-efficacy vary by the type of educational outcome. Implications for research on teaching and teacher education are discussed.
%0 Journal Article
%1 lauermann2013meaning
%A Lauermann, Fani
%A Karabenick, Stuart A.
%D 2013
%J Teaching and Teacher Education
%K Teacher beliefs characteristics efficacy responsibility
%P 13-26
%T The meaning and measure of teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes
%V 30
%X We provide a critical review of existing teacher responsibility measures, develop the rationale for, and introduce a new Teacher Responsibility Scale (TRS). Evidence from a sample of German pre-service teachers (Study 1) and American in-service teachers (Study 2) supported a multi-dimensional model of teacher responsibility with four subscales that assess responsibility for student motivation, student achievement, relationships with students, and teaching. The study demonstrated that teacher responsibility is conceptually and empirically distinct from self-efficacy, and that the associations between responsibility and self-efficacy vary by the type of educational outcome. Implications for research on teaching and teacher education are discussed.
@article{lauermann2013meaning,
abstract = {We provide a critical review of existing teacher responsibility measures, develop the rationale for, and introduce a new Teacher Responsibility Scale (TRS). Evidence from a sample of German pre-service teachers (Study 1) and American in-service teachers (Study 2) supported a multi-dimensional model of teacher responsibility with four subscales that assess responsibility for student motivation, student achievement, relationships with students, and teaching. The study demonstrated that teacher responsibility is conceptually and empirically distinct from self-efficacy, and that the associations between responsibility and self-efficacy vary by the type of educational outcome. Implications for research on teaching and teacher education are discussed.},
added-at = {2019-10-08T15:30:06.000+0200},
author = {Lauermann, Fani and Karabenick, Stuart A.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b5fd0fb5f7704003bdc68966a9ef2b49/insidestudie},
interhash = {20a0c144fcd70aabc951a29da2afee71},
intrahash = {b5fd0fb5f7704003bdc68966a9ef2b49},
journal = {Teaching and Teacher Education},
keywords = {Teacher beliefs characteristics efficacy responsibility},
pages = {13-26},
timestamp = {2022-07-14T17:28:29.000+0200},
title = {The meaning and measure of teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes},
volume = 30,
year = 2013
}