L. Bornmann, and D. Hans-Dieter. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 58 (9):
1381--1385(2007)
Abstract
Jorge Hirsch (2005a, 2005b) recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.
%0 Journal Article
%1 citeulike:1655551
%A Bornmann, Lutz
%A Hans-Dieter, Daniel
%D 2007
%E Interscience, Wiley
%J JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
%K h_index
%N 9
%P 1381--1385
%T What Do We Know About the h Index?
%U http://www.lutz-bornmann.de/icons/BornmannDanielHReview.pdf
%V 58
%X Jorge Hirsch (2005a, 2005b) recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.
@article{citeulike:1655551,
abstract = {Jorge Hirsch (2005a, 2005b) recently proposed the h index to quantify the research output of individual scientists. The new index has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific community. The claim that the h index in a single number provides a good representation of the scientific lifetime achievement of a scientist as well as the (supposed) simple calculation of the h index using common literature databases lead to the danger of improper use of the index. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of the h index and summarize the studies on the convergent validity of this index. We also introduce corrections and complements as well as single-number alternatives to the h index.},
added-at = {2007-11-22T18:12:11.000+0100},
author = {Bornmann, Lutz and Hans-Dieter, Daniel},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c0497e2c29128ca181709e3e83b8a21f/jsicot},
citeulike-article-id = {1655551},
editor = {Interscience, Wiley},
interhash = {ab6ad5f37ab06332c9c5f08119791e1c},
intrahash = {c0497e2c29128ca181709e3e83b8a21f},
journal = {JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY},
keywords = {h_index},
number = 9,
pages = {1381--1385},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2007-11-22T18:12:12.000+0100},
title = {What Do We Know About the h Index?},
url = {http://www.lutz-bornmann.de/icons/BornmannDanielHReview.pdf},
volume = 58,
year = 2007
}