On defining library and information science as applied philosophy of information

. Social Epistemology 16 (1): 37-49 (2002)


This paper analyses the relations between philosophy of information (PI), library and information science (LIS) and social epistemology (SE). In the rst section, it is argued that there is a natural relation between philosophy and LIS but that SE cannot provide a satisfactory foundation for LIS. SE should rather be seen as sharing with LIS a common ground, represented by the study of information, to be investigated by a new discipline, PI. In the second section, the nature of PI is outlined as the philosophical area that studies the conceptual nature of information, its dynamics and problems. In the third section, LIS is de ned as a form of applied PI. The hypothesis supported is that PI should replace SE as the philosophical discipline that can best provide the conceptual foundation for LIS. In the conclusion, it is suggested that the ‘identity’ crisis undergone by LIS has been the natural outcome of a justi ed but precocious search for a philosophical counterpart that has emerged only recently: namely, PI. The development of LIS should not rely on some borrowed, pre-packaged theory. As applied PI, LIS can fruitfully contribute to the growth of basic theoretical research in PI itself and thus provide its own foundation.

Links and resources

BibTeX key:
search on:

Comments and Reviews  

There is no review or comment yet. You can write one!


Cite this publication