One of the central goals in any scientific endeavor is to understand causality. Experiments that seek to demonstrate a cause/effect relation most often manipulate the postulated causal factor. Aarts et al. describe the replication of 100 experiments reported in papers published in 2008 in three high-ranking psychology journals. Assessing whether the replication and the original experiment yielded the same result according to several criteria, they find that about one-third to one-half of the original findings were also observed in the replication study.
%0 Journal Article
%1 open_science_collaboration_estimating_2015
%A Open Science Collaboration,
%D 2015
%J Science
%K imported
%N 6251
%P aac4716--aac4716
%R 10.1126/science.aac4716
%T Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
%U http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716
%V 349
%X One of the central goals in any scientific endeavor is to understand causality. Experiments that seek to demonstrate a cause/effect relation most often manipulate the postulated causal factor. Aarts et al. describe the replication of 100 experiments reported in papers published in 2008 in three high-ranking psychology journals. Assessing whether the replication and the original experiment yielded the same result according to several criteria, they find that about one-third to one-half of the original findings were also observed in the replication study.
@article{open_science_collaboration_estimating_2015,
abstract = {One of the central goals in any scientific endeavor is to understand causality. Experiments that seek to demonstrate a cause/effect relation most often manipulate the postulated causal factor. Aarts et al. describe the replication of 100 experiments reported in papers published in 2008 in three high-ranking psychology journals. Assessing whether the replication and the original experiment yielded the same result according to several criteria, they find that about one-third to one-half of the original findings were also observed in the replication study.},
added-at = {2017-01-09T13:57:26.000+0100},
author = {{Open Science Collaboration}},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c83d1c7582c56937ec5fd4677841ecef/yourwelcome},
doi = {10.1126/science.aac4716},
interhash = {b8944160221ce9dfb911e24cf59f8adb},
intrahash = {c83d1c7582c56937ec5fd4677841ecef},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
journal = {Science},
keywords = {imported},
language = {en},
month = aug,
number = 6251,
pages = {aac4716--aac4716},
timestamp = {2017-01-09T14:01:11.000+0100},
title = {Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science},
url = {http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716},
urldate = {2016-12-12},
volume = 349,
year = 2015
}