%0 Conference Paper %1 Shahriyar:2012:DCG:2258996.2259008 %A Shahriyar, Rifat %A Blackburn, Stephen M. %A Frampton, Daniel %B Proceedings of the 2012 international symposium on Memory Management %C New York, NY, USA %D 2012 %I ACM %K GC GarbageCollection %P 73--84 %R 10.1145/2258996.2259008 %T Down for the count? Getting reference counting back in the ring %U http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2258996.2259008 %X Reference counting and tracing are the two fundamental approaches that have underpinned garbage collection since 1960. However, despite some compelling advantages, reference counting is almost completely ignored in implementations of high performance systems today. In this paper we take a detailed look at reference counting to understand its behavior and to improve its performance. We identify key design choices for reference counting and analyze how the behavior of a wide range of benchmarks might affect design decisions. As far as we are aware, this is the first such quantitative study of reference counting. We use insights gleaned from this analysis to introduce a number of optimizations that significantly improve the performance of reference counting.</p> <p>We find that an existing modern implementation of reference counting has an average 30% overhead compared to tracing, and that in combination, our optimizations are able to completely eliminate that overhead. This brings the performance of reference counting on par with that of a well tuned mark-sweep collector. We keep our in-depth analysis of reference counting as general as possible so that it may be useful to other garbage collector implementers. Our finding that reference counting can be made directly competitive with well tuned mark-sweep should shake the community's prejudices about reference counting and perhaps open new opportunities for exploiting reference counting's strengths, such as localization and immediacy of reclamation. %@ 978-1-4503-1350-6

@inproceedings{Shahriyar:2012:DCG:2258996.2259008, abstract = {Reference counting and tracing are the two fundamental approaches that have underpinned garbage collection since 1960. However, despite some compelling advantages, reference counting is almost completely ignored in implementations of high performance systems today. In this paper we take a detailed look at reference counting to understand its behavior and to improve its performance. We identify key design choices for reference counting and analyze how the behavior of a wide range of benchmarks might affect design decisions. As far as we are aware, this is the first such quantitative study of reference counting. We use insights gleaned from this analysis to introduce a number of optimizations that significantly improve the performance of reference counting.</p> <p>We find that an existing modern implementation of reference counting has an average 30% overhead compared to tracing, and that in combination, our optimizations are able to completely eliminate that overhead. This brings the performance of reference counting on par with that of a well tuned mark-sweep collector. We keep our in-depth analysis of reference counting as general as possible so that it may be useful to other garbage collector implementers. Our finding that reference counting can be made directly competitive with well tuned mark-sweep should shake the community's prejudices about reference counting and perhaps open new opportunities for exploiting reference counting's strengths, such as localization and immediacy of reclamation.}, acmid = {2259008}, added-at = {2012-08-05T17:36:09.000+0200}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Shahriyar, Rifat and Blackburn, Stephen M. and Frampton, Daniel}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f4556e6b4daf5576911de9c51549e127/gron}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2012 international symposium on Memory Management}, description = {Down for the count? Getting reference counting back in the ring}, doi = {10.1145/2258996.2259008}, interhash = {45c2fc7d6476da0cef9802add11bd2c9}, intrahash = {f4556e6b4daf5576911de9c51549e127}, isbn = {978-1-4503-1350-6}, keywords = {GC GarbageCollection}, location = {Beijing, China}, numpages = {12}, pages = {73--84}, publisher = {ACM}, series = {ISMM '12}, timestamp = {2012-08-05T17:36:09.000+0200}, title = {Down for the count? Getting reference counting back in the ring}, url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2258996.2259008}, year = 2012 }