%0 Journal Article %1 Russell2003 %A Russell, Dianne J %A Leung, Karen M %A Rosenbaum, Peter L %D 2003 %J Phys Occup Ther Pediatr %K Cerebral Palsy; Child; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disability Evaluation; Educational Measurement; Humans; Motor Skills; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Physical Therapy (Specialty) %N 2 %P 45--58 %T Accessibility and perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66: evaluating therapists' judgements of a computer-based scoring program. %V 23 %X The 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) requires a computer program for scoring. The primary purpose of this study was to pilot test the scoring software and examine the perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66 as judged by 48 pediatric physical therapists. Sixty-one percent of therapists were confident in their ability to interpret the information from the computer program following one hour spent reading the tutorial and interpretation guidelines. Ninety-three percent of respondents perceived the overall clinical utility of the GMFM-66 in terms of administration, scoring and interpretation to be the same or more clinically useful than the GMFM-88.

@article{Russell2003, abstract = {The 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) requires a computer program for scoring. The primary purpose of this study was to pilot test the scoring software and examine the perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66 as judged by 48 pediatric physical therapists. Sixty-one percent of therapists were confident in their ability to interpret the information from the computer program following one hour spent reading the tutorial and interpretation guidelines. Ninety-three percent of respondents perceived the overall clinical utility of the GMFM-66 in terms of administration, scoring and interpretation to be the same or more clinically useful than the GMFM-88.}, added-at = {2014-07-19T21:10:54.000+0200}, author = {Russell, Dianne J and Leung, Karen M and Rosenbaum, Peter L}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21e87a0ef49558be965d44b96786b31d2/ar0berts}, groups = {public}, interhash = {34eefcd122eeae55ff5a1fba51005600}, intrahash = {1e87a0ef49558be965d44b96786b31d2}, journal = {Phys Occup Ther Pediatr}, keywords = {Cerebral Palsy; Child; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Cross-Sectional Studies; Disability Evaluation; Educational Measurement; Humans; Motor Skills; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Physical Therapy (Specialty)}, number = 2, pages = {45--58}, pmid = {12951787}, timestamp = {2014-07-19T21:10:54.000+0200}, title = {Accessibility and perceived clinical utility of the GMFM-66: evaluating therapists' judgements of a computer-based scoring program.}, username = {ar0berts}, volume = 23, year = 2003 }