Article,
Obstetric malpractice litigation: the pathologist's view.
Am J Obstet Gynecol, 155 (5): 927--935 (November 1986)
Abstract
In obstetric malpractice litigation, there are two main bases of defense: the clinical basis and the pathogenesis basis. The malpractice suit in most cases involves an infant delivered at term that later develops cerebral palsy. Despite the fact that much information has been elucidated about the pathogenesis of cerebral palsy, the defense is often jeopardized by an inadequate presentation of relevant causal mechanisms, pathogenesis. Studies in recent years with correlated clinical and pathologic investigations have provided evidence that the occurrence of cerebral palsy is a time marker, reflecting cerebral damage incurred during the premature period, and does not result from the events of labor and delivery at term. There is broad need generally and in legal situations for clinicians and pathologists to become knowledgeable in comprehensively correlating obstetric factors with fetal-neonatal systemic pathologic conditions and with neuropathologic effects.
