%0 Journal Article %1 citeulike:5867900 %A Morris, Jane %C Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada %D 2009 %J Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology %K interpretation, lexical, lexical\_cohesion, meaning, semantic\_relations, semantics, syntactic %N 9999 %P n/a+ %R 10.1002/asi.21222 %T Individual differences in the interpretation of text: Implications for information science %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21222 %V 9999 %X Many tasks in library and information science (e.g., indexing, abstracting, classification, and text analysis techniques such as discourse and content analysis) require text meaning interpretation, and, therefore, any individual differences in interpretation are relevant and should be considered, especially for applications in which these tasks are done automatically. This article investigates individual differences in the interpretation of one aspect of text meaning that is commonly used in such automatic applications: lexical cohesion and lexical semantic relations. Experiments with 26 participants indicate an approximately 40\% difference in interpretation. In total, 79, 83, and 89 lexical chains (groups of semantically related words) were analyzed in 3 texts, respectively. A major implication of this result is the possibility of modeling individual differences for individual users. Further research is suggested for different types of texts and readers than those used here, as well as similar research for different aspects of text meaning.

@article{citeulike:5867900, abstract = {Many tasks in library and information science (e.g., indexing, abstracting, classification, and text analysis techniques such as discourse and content analysis) require text meaning interpretation, and, therefore, any individual differences in interpretation are relevant and should be considered, especially for applications in which these tasks are done automatically. This article investigates individual differences in the interpretation of one aspect of text meaning that is commonly used in such automatic applications: lexical cohesion and lexical semantic relations. Experiments with 26 participants indicate an approximately 40\% difference in interpretation. In total, 79, 83, and 89 lexical chains (groups of semantically related words) were analyzed in 3 texts, respectively. A major implication of this result is the possibility of modeling individual differences for individual users. Further research is suggested for different types of texts and readers than those used here, as well as similar research for different aspects of text meaning.}, added-at = {2009-12-11T23:34:46.000+0100}, address = {Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada}, author = {Morris, Jane}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cd1206e8b29eb05e64a9a2c8945b7005/djsaab}, citeulike-article-id = {5867900}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21222}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/122613780/ABSTRACT}, description = {djsaab's CiteULike library 20091211}, doi = {10.1002/asi.21222}, interhash = {6db639e3590b6aff61577d89da236d2e}, intrahash = {cd1206e8b29eb05e64a9a2c8945b7005}, issn = {1532-2890}, journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology}, keywords = {interpretation, lexical, lexical\_cohesion, meaning, semantic\_relations, semantics, syntactic}, number = 9999, pages = {n/a+}, posted-at = {2009-10-01 15:07:18}, priority = {2}, timestamp = {2009-12-11T23:34:48.000+0100}, title = {Individual differences in the interpretation of text: Implications for information science}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21222}, volume = 9999, year = 2009 }