%0 Journal Article %1 bloss_reimagining_2016 %A Bloss, Cinnamon %A Nebeker, Camille %A Bietz, Matthew %A Bae, Deborah %A Bigby, Barbara %A Devereaux, Mary %A Fowler, James %A Waldo, Ann %A Weibel, Nadir %A Patrick, Kevin %A Klemmer, Scott %A Melichar, Lori %D 2016 %J Journal of Medical Internet Research %K 21st Biomedical Century, Consent, Experimentation, Forecasting, History, Human Humans, Informed Research, Telemedicine, behavioral biomedical committees, consent, ethics informed research, telemedicine %N 12 %P e329 %R 10.2196/jmir.6634 %T Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science %V 18 %X BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human research oversight system. METHODS: A total of 11 researchers and institutional review board (IRB) professionals participated in a January 2015 design thinking workshop to develop ideas for redesigning the IRB system. RESULTS: Ideas in 5 major domains were generated. The areas of focus were (1) improving the consent form and process, (2) empowering researchers to protect their participants, (3) creating a system to learn from mistakes, (4) improving IRB efficiency, and (5) facilitating review of research that leverages technological advances. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the impetus for and results of a design thinking workshop to reimagine a human research protections system that is responsive to 21st century science.

@article{bloss_reimagining_2016, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Evolving research practices and new forms of research enabled by technological advances require a redesigned research oversight system that respects and protects human research participants. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to generate creative ideas for redesigning our current human research oversight system. METHODS: A total of 11 researchers and institutional review board (IRB) professionals participated in a January 2015 design thinking workshop to develop ideas for redesigning the IRB system. RESULTS: Ideas in 5 major domains were generated. The areas of focus were (1) improving the consent form and process, (2) empowering researchers to protect their participants, (3) creating a system to learn from mistakes, (4) improving IRB efficiency, and (5) facilitating review of research that leverages technological advances. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the impetus for and results of a design thinking workshop to reimagine a human research protections system that is responsive to 21st century science.}, added-at = {2019-02-18T07:11:07.000+0100}, author = {Bloss, Cinnamon and Nebeker, Camille and Bietz, Matthew and Bae, Deborah and Bigby, Barbara and Devereaux, Mary and Fowler, James and Waldo, Ann and Weibel, Nadir and Patrick, Kevin and Klemmer, Scott and Melichar, Lori}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c064691adb1b336ae724b83e374088aa/weibel}, doi = {10.2196/jmir.6634}, interhash = {71a18e367e8eaad2d833aa0bc7ec64aa}, intrahash = {c064691adb1b336ae724b83e374088aa}, issn = {1438-8871}, journal = {Journal of Medical Internet Research}, keywords = {21st Biomedical Century, Consent, Experimentation, Forecasting, History, Human Humans, Informed Research, Telemedicine, behavioral biomedical committees, consent, ethics informed research, telemedicine}, language = {eng}, number = 12, pages = {e329}, pmcid = {PMC5216254}, pmid = {28007687}, timestamp = {2019-02-18T07:11:07.000+0100}, title = {Reimagining {Human} {Research} {Protections} for 21st {Century} {Science}}, volume = 18, year = 2016 }