%0 Journal Article %1 halme_quantifying_2009 %A Halme, Panu %A Mönkkönen, Mikko %A Kotiaho, Janne S. %A Ylisirniö, Anna-Liisa %A Markkanen, Anni %D 2009 %J Conservation Biology %K Dendrocopos, biodiversity conservation indicator indicators, species species, surrogate value, %N 4 %P 1008--1016 %R 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01206.x %T Quantifying the indicator power of an indicator species %U http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01206.x/full %V 23 %X Abstract: Biodiversity indicator species are needed for classifying biotopes and sites for conservation, and a number of methods have been developed for determining indicator species for this purpose. Nevertheless, in addition to site classification, there is sometimes a need to define an indicator species that indicates the occurrence of another species. For example, when a species of interest (target species) is difficult to detect or identify, a reliable indicator species can function as a tool that saves time and money. We derived a method that provides a quantitative measure of the indicator power (IP) of an indicator species for the target species or any species assemblage. We calculated the measure of IP from a presence–absence matrix that covered several sites. The method provided a list of indicator species, the presence of which reliably indicated the presence of another species (e.g., a threatened or rare species in a given area). The IP of the species was highest when the number of shared occurrences between the indicator species and the target species was high and, simultaneously, when the indicator species and the target species occurred separately in only a few cases. The IP was also positively influenced by the number of sites with no occurrences of either the indicator or the target species. Our method can also be used to quantify different types of species occurrence indications. We refer to these types as presence–presence, presence–absence, absence–presence, and absence–absence indications. To clarify the use of the method, we examined the situation with red-listed polypores in White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) habitats in Fennoscandia and found some suitable indicator species. Our method provides a new, objective way to evaluate the IP of an indicator species.

@article{halme_quantifying_2009, abstract = {Abstract: Biodiversity indicator species are needed for classifying biotopes and sites for conservation, and a number of methods have been developed for determining indicator species for this purpose. Nevertheless, in addition to site classification, there is sometimes a need to define an indicator species that indicates the occurrence of another species. For example, when a species of interest (target species) is difficult to detect or identify, a reliable indicator species can function as a tool that saves time and money. We derived a method that provides a quantitative measure of the indicator power (IP) of an indicator species for the target species or any species assemblage. We calculated the measure of IP from a presence–absence matrix that covered several sites. The method provided a list of indicator species, the presence of which reliably indicated the presence of another species (e.g., a threatened or rare species in a given area). The IP of the species was highest when the number of shared occurrences between the indicator species and the target species was high and, simultaneously, when the indicator species and the target species occurred separately in only a few cases. The IP was also positively influenced by the number of sites with no occurrences of either the indicator or the target species. Our method can also be used to quantify different types of species occurrence indications. We refer to these types as presence–presence, presence–absence, absence–presence, and absence–absence indications. To clarify the use of the method, we examined the situation with red-listed polypores in White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) habitats in Fennoscandia and found some suitable indicator species. Our method provides a new, objective way to evaluate the IP of an indicator species.}, added-at = {2017-01-09T13:57:26.000+0100}, author = {Halme, Panu and Mönkkönen, Mikko and Kotiaho, Janne S. and Ylisirniö, Anna-Liisa and Markkanen, Anni}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f0cb8f95b315100faa58bcbe4c9806e5/yourwelcome}, copyright = {©2009 Society for Conservation Biology}, doi = {10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01206.x}, interhash = {b8d7081ff77d77a5f44993142d93705a}, intrahash = {f0cb8f95b315100faa58bcbe4c9806e5}, issn = {1523-1739}, journal = {Conservation Biology}, keywords = {Dendrocopos, biodiversity conservation indicator indicators, species species, surrogate value,}, language = {en}, month = aug, number = 4, pages = {1008--1016}, timestamp = {2017-01-09T14:01:11.000+0100}, title = {Quantifying the indicator power of an indicator species}, url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01206.x/full}, urldate = {2012-05-06}, volume = 23, year = 2009 }