%0 Journal Article %1 citeulike:4276351 %A Hanwright, Jennifer %A Zhou, James %A Evans, Geoffrey M. %A Galvin, Kevin P. %D 2005 %I American Chemical Society %J Langmuir %K 82b26-phase-transitions 76t10-liquid-gas-two-phase-flows-bubbly-flows %N 11 %P 4912--4920 %R 10.1021/la0502894 %T Influence of Surfactant on Gas Bubble Stability %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la0502894 %V 21 %X Gas-bubble stability is achieved either by a reduction in the Laplace pressure or by a reduction in the permeability of the gas?liquid interface. Although insoluble surfactants have been shown definitively in many studies to lower the permeability of the gas?liquid interface and hence increase the resistance to interfacial mass transfer, remarkably little work has been done on the effects of soluble surfactants. An experimental system was developed to measure the effect of the soluble surfactant dodecyl trimethylammonium bromide on the desorption and absorption of carbon dioxide gas through a quiescent planar interface. The desorption experiments conformed to the model of non-steady-state molecular diffusion. The absorption experiments, however, produced an unexpected mass transfer mechanism, with surface renewal, probably because of instability in the density gradient formed by the carbon dioxide. In general, the soluble surfactant produced no measurable reduction in the rate of interfacial mass transfer for desorption or absorption. This finding is consistent with the conclusion of Caskey and Barlage30 that soluble surfactants produce a significantly lower resistance to interfacial mass transfer than do insoluble surfactants. The dynamic adsorption and desorption of the surfactant molecules at the gas?liquid interface creates short-term vacancies, which presumably permit the unrestricted transfer of the gas molecules through the interface. This surfactant exchange does not occur for insoluble surfactants. Gas bubbles formed in the presence of a high concentration of soluble surfactant were observed to dissolve completely, while those formed in the presence of the insoluble surfactant stearic acid did not dissolve easily, and persisted for very long periods. The interfacial concentration of stearic acid rises during bubble dissolution, as it is insoluble, and must eventually achieve full monolayer coverage and a state of compression, lowering the permeability of the interface. Thus, insoluble surfactants or hydrophobic impurities from solid surfaces may account for increased bubble stability.

@article{citeulike:4276351, abstract = {{Gas-bubble stability is achieved either by a reduction in the Laplace pressure or by a reduction in the permeability of the gas?liquid interface. Although insoluble surfactants have been shown definitively in many studies to lower the permeability of the gas?liquid interface and hence increase the resistance to interfacial mass transfer, remarkably little work has been done on the effects of soluble surfactants. An experimental system was developed to measure the effect of the soluble surfactant dodecyl trimethylammonium bromide on the desorption and absorption of carbon dioxide gas through a quiescent planar interface. The desorption experiments conformed to the model of non-steady-state molecular diffusion. The absorption experiments, however, produced an unexpected mass transfer mechanism, with surface renewal, probably because of instability in the density gradient formed by the carbon dioxide. In general, the soluble surfactant produced no measurable reduction in the rate of interfacial mass transfer for desorption or absorption. This finding is consistent with the conclusion of Caskey and Barlage30 that soluble surfactants produce a significantly lower resistance to interfacial mass transfer than do insoluble surfactants. The dynamic adsorption and desorption of the surfactant molecules at the gas?liquid interface creates short-term vacancies, which presumably permit the unrestricted transfer of the gas molecules through the interface. This surfactant exchange does not occur for insoluble surfactants. Gas bubbles formed in the presence of a high concentration of soluble surfactant were observed to dissolve completely, while those formed in the presence of the insoluble surfactant stearic acid did not dissolve easily, and persisted for very long periods. The interfacial concentration of stearic acid rises during bubble dissolution, as it is insoluble, and must eventually achieve full monolayer coverage and a state of compression, lowering the permeability of the interface. Thus, insoluble surfactants or hydrophobic impurities from solid surfaces may account for increased bubble stability.}}, added-at = {2017-06-29T07:13:07.000+0200}, author = {Hanwright, Jennifer and Zhou, James and Evans, Geoffrey M. and Galvin, Kevin P.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e53f871d2bbcf29007258217ac455532/gdmcbain}, citeulike-article-id = {4276351}, citeulike-attachment-1 = {hanwright_05_influence_33823.pdf; /pdf/user/gdmcbain/article/4276351/33823/hanwright_05_influence_33823.pdf; 9066b8e84747aa2e923e01544ce8d2d3f5248d87}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la0502894}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/la0502894}, comment = {(private-note)Circulated by SGM with Jones et al (1998)}, day = 1, doi = {10.1021/la0502894}, file = {hanwright_05_influence_33823.pdf}, interhash = {cabc1454092671069fd2937569cfaeb5}, intrahash = {e53f871d2bbcf29007258217ac455532}, journal = {Langmuir}, keywords = {82b26-phase-transitions 76t10-liquid-gas-two-phase-flows-bubbly-flows}, month = may, number = 11, pages = {4912--4920}, posted-at = {2009-04-06 02:03:02}, priority = {2}, publisher = {American Chemical Society}, timestamp = {2019-02-27T00:56:08.000+0100}, title = {{Influence of Surfactant on Gas Bubble Stability}}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la0502894}, volume = 21, year = 2005 }