%0 Journal Article %1 wang2018photoactive %A Wang, Gang %A Eastham, Nicholas D. %A Aldrich, Thomas J. %A Ma, Boran %A Manley, Eric F. %A Chen, Zhihua %A Chen, Lin X. %A Cruz, Monica Olvera de la %A Chang, Robert P. H. %A Melkonyan, Ferdinand S. %A Facchetti, Antonio %A Marks, Tobin J. %D 2018 %I Wiley Online Library %J Advanced Energy Materials %K morphology nonfullerene organic processing %N 12 %R 10.1002/aenm.201702173 %T Photoactive Blend Morphology Engineering through Systematically Tuning Aggregation in All‐Polymer Solar Cells %U https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702173 %V 8 %X Polymer aggregation plays a critical role in the miscibility of materials and the performance of all‐polymer solar cells (APSCs). However, many aspects of how polymer texturing and aggregation affect photoactive blend film microstructure and photovoltaic performance are poorly understood. Here the effects of aggregation in donor–acceptor blends are studied, in which the number‐average molecular weights (Mns) of both an amorphous donor polymer, poly4,8‐bis(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)thiophen‐2‐yl)benzo1,2‐b;4,5‐b′dithiophene‐2,6‐diyl‐alt‐(4‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐3‐fluorothieno3,4‐bthiophene‐)‐2‐carboxylate‐2‐6‐diyl) (PBDTT‐FTTE) and a semicrystalline acceptor polymer, polyN,N′‐bis(2‐octyldodecyl)naphthalene‐1,4,5,8‐bis(dicarboximide)‐2,6‐diyl‐alt‐5,5′‐(2,2′‐bithiophene) (P(NDI2OD‐T2)) are systematically varied. The photovoltaic performance is correlated with active layer microstructural and optoelectronic data acquired by in‐depth transmission electron microscopy, grazing incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering, thermal analysis, and optical spectroscopic measurements. Coarse‐grained modeling provides insight into the effects of polymer aggregation on the blend morphology. Notably, the computed average distance between the donor and the acceptor polymers correlates well with solar cell photovoltaic metrics such as short‐circuit current density (Jsc) and represents a useful index for understanding/predicting active layer blend material intermixing trends. Importantly, these results demonstrate that for polymers with different texturing tendencies (amorphous/semicrystalline), the key for optimal APSC performance, photovoltaic blend morphology can be controlled via both donor and acceptor polymer aggregation. The templating effects in morphology engineering by regulating aggregation are clearly demonstrated for the first time in all‐polymer solar cells, where the morphology may be templated by the amorphous phase in one blend and by the semicrystalline phase in another, all dictated by the degree of polymer aggregation.

@article{wang2018photoactive, abstract = {Polymer aggregation plays a critical role in the miscibility of materials and the performance of all‐polymer solar cells (APSCs). However, many aspects of how polymer texturing and aggregation affect photoactive blend film microstructure and photovoltaic performance are poorly understood. Here the effects of aggregation in donor–acceptor blends are studied, in which the number‐average molecular weights (Mns) of both an amorphous donor polymer, poly[4,8‐bis(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)thiophen‐2‐yl)benzo[1,2‐b;4,5‐b′]dithiophene‐2,6‐diyl‐alt‐(4‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐3‐fluorothieno[3,4‐b]thiophene‐)‐2‐carboxylate‐2‐6‐diyl)] (PBDTT‐FTTE) and a semicrystalline acceptor polymer, poly{[N,N′‐bis(2‐octyldodecyl)naphthalene‐1,4,5,8‐bis(dicarboximide)‐2,6‐diyl]‐alt‐5,5′‐(2,2′‐bithiophene)} (P(NDI2OD‐T2)) are systematically varied. The photovoltaic performance is correlated with active layer microstructural and optoelectronic data acquired by in‐depth transmission electron microscopy, grazing incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering, thermal analysis, and optical spectroscopic measurements. Coarse‐grained modeling provides insight into the effects of polymer aggregation on the blend morphology. Notably, the computed average distance between the donor and the acceptor polymers correlates well with solar cell photovoltaic metrics such as short‐circuit current density (Jsc) and represents a useful index for understanding/predicting active layer blend material intermixing trends. Importantly, these results demonstrate that for polymers with different texturing tendencies (amorphous/semicrystalline), the key for optimal APSC performance, photovoltaic blend morphology can be controlled via both donor and acceptor polymer aggregation. The templating effects in morphology engineering by regulating aggregation are clearly demonstrated for the first time in all‐polymer solar cells, where the morphology may be templated by the amorphous phase in one blend and by the semicrystalline phase in another, all dictated by the degree of polymer aggregation.}, added-at = {2018-07-02T15:53:50.000+0200}, author = {Wang, Gang and Eastham, Nicholas D. and Aldrich, Thomas J. and Ma, Boran and Manley, Eric F. and Chen, Zhihua and Chen, Lin X. and Cruz, Monica Olvera de la and Chang, Robert P. H. and Melkonyan, Ferdinand S. and Facchetti, Antonio and Marks, Tobin J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22403a4fbe38fc6c9e12fc12c246e64ad/bretschneider_m}, doi = {10.1002/aenm.201702173}, interhash = {d0190bdc19196bd75e758eb9a846964a}, intrahash = {2403a4fbe38fc6c9e12fc12c246e64ad}, issn = {1614-6832}, journal = {Advanced Energy Materials}, keywords = {morphology nonfullerene organic processing}, month = {4}, number = 12, publisher = {Wiley Online Library}, timestamp = {2018-07-02T15:53:50.000+0200}, title = {Photoactive Blend Morphology Engineering through Systematically Tuning Aggregation in All‐Polymer Solar Cells}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702173}, volume = 8, year = 2018 }