SDN Hypervisors: How Much Does Topology Abstraction Matter?
, , , , and .

SDN network hypervisors realize the virtualization of software-defined networks. They intercept the control path between tenant controllers and their respective virtual Software-Defined Networks (SDN). Over-utilizing SDN hypervisor resources (i.e., CPU) can degrade the control plane performance of the tenants. Although many hypervisor proposals exists, a detailed performance modeling of SDN hypervisors is missing in literature. A precise modeling of the required SDN hypervisor resources, however, is crucial for predictable and reliable operation of virtual software-defined networks. In this paper, we measure and evaluate how topology abstraction can affect the SDN hypervisor CPU utilization. We consider two topology abstraction cases: the (1) transparent and (2) big-switch abstraction. Our measurements taken from a real testbed indicate that the big-switch abstraction can reduce the SDN hypervisor CPU utilization up to ∼4×. Further, we evaluate different functions to model the SDN hypervisor CPU utilization based on our measurement results. Our evaluations show that a polynomial function provides the lowest fitting error. Motivated by our measurements, we conduct a first-step investigation of the impacts of topology abstraction on the Virtual Network Embedding (VNE) problem. Our initial simulation-based evaluations indicate that different topology abstraction procedures impact the results of the VNE problem.
  • @dblp
  • @lkn
This publication has not been reviewed yet.

rating distribution
average user rating0.0 out of 5.0 based on 0 reviews
    Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).