Diaspora lässt dich deine Kontakte in Gruppen einordnen. Deine Fotos, Geschichten und Witze werden durch diese Aspekte nur mit den Menschen geteilt, für die sie gedacht sind – einzigartig bei Diaspora.
The past decade has seen a convergence of social and technological networks, with systems such as the World Wide Web characterized by the interplay between rich information content, the millions of individuals and organizations who create it, and the technology that supports it. This course covers recent research on the structure and analysis of such networks, and on models that abstract their basic properties. Topics include combinatorial and probabilistic techniques for link analysis, centralized and decentralized search algorithms, network models based on random graphs, and connections with work in the social sciences.
[Web] surfing mimics a postmodern, deconstructionist perspective by undermining the authority of texts...no longer awed by received authority...in the form of text, graphics, music or code...[web surfers will use them] for their own purposes.
The World Wide Database is a globally distributed network of data records that reside on millions of nodes around the network which collectively behaves as a giant virtual, decentralized database system...we need a new kind of server for hosting WWDB node
Building a centralized database to process billions of open-ended queries per day is a mammoth undertaking. It appears that Google, who perhaps is the only company on the planet with enough imagination, incentive, and expertise to effectively build such a
What information will be deemed Proprietary? What information is part of the Information Commons? Who decides? How is it decided? Centralized? Decentralized? Opaque? Transparent?
H. Nguyen, D. Bozhkov, Z. Ahmadi, N. Nguyen, and T. Doan. Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ACM, (July 2022)
Narita. IJIRIS:: International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security, Volume VI (Issue VI):
117-128(November 2019)1. Symantec, 2019 Internet Security Threat Report, Vol. 24, 2019. 2. Akamai, 2019 State of the Internet / Security: Media Under Assault, 2019. https://www.akamai.com 3. J. Xia, S. Vangala, J. Wu, L. Gao, and K. Kwiat, “Effective Worm Detection for Various Scan Technique,” Journal of Computer Security, vol.14, no.4, pp.359–387, 2006. 4. W. Yu, X. Wang, X. Fu, D. Xuan, and W. Zhao, “An Invisible Localization Attack to Internet Threat Monitors,” IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol.20, no.11, pp.1611–1625, 2009. 5. M. Narita, K. Ogura, B.B. Bista, and T. Takata, “Evaluating a Dynamic Internet Threat Monitoring Method for Preventing PN Code-Based Localization Attack,” Proc. 17th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS 2014), 2014. 6. M. Narita, B.B. Bista, and T. Takata, “A Practical Study on Noise-Tolerant PN Code-Based Localisation Attacks to Internet Threat Monitors,” Int. J. Space-Based and Situated Computing, vol.3, no.4, pp.215–226, December 2013. 7. W. Yu, S. Wei, G. Ma, X. Fu, and N. Zhang, “On Effective Localization Attacks Against Internet Threat Monitors,” Proc. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp.2011–2015, 2013. 8. UCSD Network Telescope. https://www.caida.org/projects/network telescope/ 9. Guillot, R. Fontugne, P. Winter, P. Me´rindol, A. King, A. Dainotti, and C. Pelsser, “Chocolatine: Outage Detection for Internet Background Radiation,” 10. Proc. Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), June 2019. DShield. http://www.dshield.org/ 11. M. Eto, D. Inoue, J. Song, J. Nakazato, K. Ohtaka, and K. Nakao, “nicter: A Large-Scale Network Incident Analysis System: Case Studies for Understanding Threat Landscape,” Proc. 1st Workshop on Building Analysis Datasets and Gathering Experience Returns for Security, pp.37–45, 2011. 12. D. Inoue, M. Eto, K. Suzuki, M. Suzuki, and K. Nakao, “DAEDALUS-VIZ: Novel Real-Time 3D Visualization for Darknet Monitoring-Based Alert System,” Proc. 9th International Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security, pp.72–79, October 2012. 13. H. Kanehara, Y. Murakami, J. Shimamura, T. Takahashi, D. Inoue and N. Murata, “Real-time botnet detection using nonnegative tucker decomposition,” 14. Proc. the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, pp.1337–1344, April 2019. 15. X. Fan, C. Li, and X. Dong, “ A Real-Time Network Security Visualization System Based on Incremental Learning (ChinaVis 2018),” J. Visualization, pp.1–15, October 2018. 16. Y. Shinoda, K. Ikai, and M. Itoh, “Vulnerabilities of Passive Internet Threat Monitors,” Proc. 14th USENIX Security Symposium, pp.209–224, 2005. 17. J. Bethencourt, J. Franklin, and M. Vernon, “Mapping Internet Sensors with Probe Response Attacks,” Proc. 14th USENIX Security Symposium, pp.193– 208, 2005. 18. S. Wei, D. Shen, L. Ge, W. Yu, E.P. Blasch, K.D. Pham, and G. Chen, “Secured Network Sensor-Based Defense System,” Proc. SPIE 9469, Sensors and Systems for Space Applications VIII, 2015. 19. W. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Fu, R. Bettati, and W. Zhao, “Localization Attacks to Internet Threat Monitors: Modeling and Countermeasures,” IEEE Trans. Computers, vol.59, no.12, pp.1655–1668, 2010. 20. ENISA, “Proactive Detection of Network Security Incidents, Report,” https://www.enisa.europa.eu/2011. 21. M. Kamizono et al., “anti Malware engineering WorkShop ~MWS Datasets 2015~,” MWS2015, 2015..
C. Trattner, D. Helic, P. Singer, and M. Strohmaier. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, page 14. ACM, (2012)