This project links in an interactive way written and visual evidence concerning medieval and early Renaissance Rome, including the descriptions of the City, the inscriptions associated with monuments and works of art.
he database provides access to the archival material of the CIL, the squeezes, photos and records of the inscriptions edited in the CIL. The entries are linked to the epigraphic database Clauss – Slaby EDCS, so that the text of the inscriptions is also available.
1749, str. NEKA POGREŠKA, vidi sv. 41
http://biblioteca.imss.fi.it/LV2_1bin/LibriVision/lv_view_records.html?SESSION_ID=1354940447_635723058&lv_action=LV_View_Records&NR_RECORDS_TO_SHOW=10&GOTO_RECORD=1&RESULT_SET_NAME=set_1355004635_0&HTML_SEARCH_TYPE_REALLY=&DISPLAY_RECORD_XSLT=html_full&ELEMENT_SET_NAME=F&DB_ID=23&CCL_QUERY=AN%20323811
http://bibdig.museogalileo.it/Teca/Viewer?an=000000323811
Nel fondo manoscritti sono compresi: codici del sec. XV, Cronache, Statuti e ordinamenti, Archivi familiari, blasonari e genealogie, raccolte di iscrizioni, altri manoscritti di argomento faentino.
Tra i più conosciuti si citano:... Felice Feliciano Veronese [Sylloge inscriptionum latinarum veterum] (riconosciuto da Augusto Campana come in parte autografo).
The practical lesson to be gained from Mark Handley's "Epitaphs, Models, and Texts: A Carolingian Collection of Late Antique Inscriptions from Burgundy" is that many of the syllogai of inscriptions from the Middle Ages may have begun life as model books for the production of epitaphs. He reconstructs the very detailed history of one such sylloge from Paris (BN Lat 2832), which includes various examples of poetry, including a section of epitaphs. Some of the epitaphs derive from extant examples in Gaul, and he argues that the entries in the epigraphic section were collected to serve as a model book for the actual production of tombstones.
In a letter written in 1530, Fabio Vigili warned Benedetto Egio against the dangers of forgery in general and Annius in particular, and in the 1540s Matal considered it important to include a copy of this letter in his annotations to Mazochi's Epigrammata. By then scholars were exchanging names of suspected sources and discussing signs of forgery, from suspicious circumstances of finding to Matal's general advice to suspect anything from Spain. S. demonstrates how with the development of epigraphical knowledge scholars were becoming especially good at detecting inscriptions concocted on the basis of literary records. The same development, however, altered the nature of forgeries, and there started to appear counterfeits based on other inscriptions, rather than on literary sources, the detection of which proved harder. Here S. offers a most fascinating discussion of Pirro Ligorio, who prolifically forged inscriptions, basing them on existing ones, but also sometimes relying on literary and other evidence.